Active Users:481 Time:15/08/2026 06:35:36 AM
it wasn't a bone HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM

View original post
It is basically a hole in a bucket. As long as money is going in faster than it is leaking out it will work. The overall medical cost of people who could afford insurance but are not getting it then get something like cancer is a pretty small percentage of the over all medical cost in this country and it won't crash the system. The mandate was at bone they threw to the insurance companies to get them to sign on and was more about forcing young healthy people to subsidize older less healthy people than it was about pre-existing conditions.

With no pre-existing exclusions, a mandate to purchase is the only thing that stops everyone from waiting until they are in the back of an ambulance to get insurance. The provision is essentially there to keep the insurance companies from challenging the entire ACA in court (and winning) under restraint of trade and them not being subject to the interstate commerce clause as they have in the past. The most recent SCotUS precedent on the topic has insurance being State regulated.

Reply to message
Obama care repeal and replace - 07/03/2017 12:33:18 AM 1052 Views
The new House version looks fine..... - 07/03/2017 03:12:55 AM 807 Views
They do expand health saving accounts *NM* - 07/03/2017 11:27:50 AM 392 Views
The "accross state lines" buzz is a farce. Do YOU want a PCP that is 800 miles away? *NM* - 07/03/2017 09:18:57 PM 426 Views
That isn't what it means at all. - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM 805 Views
But physician networks are local - 09/03/2017 04:25:33 PM 808 Views
Of course they are. - 09/03/2017 04:52:31 PM 694 Views
And your insurance premium would be WAY higher than it currently is with a native MA company. - 10/03/2017 02:21:21 PM 754 Views
The risk can be spread across networks, as it is today. - 10/03/2017 02:33:38 PM 833 Views
It only looks that way from the outside. - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM 767 Views
One breakdown - 07/03/2017 10:25:12 AM 927 Views
My head is going to blow up from reading all this news - 07/03/2017 09:16:22 PM 1001 Views
From the little I understand... - 07/03/2017 10:13:01 PM 824 Views
They can make it work and will just rasie rates - 08/03/2017 03:52:50 PM 755 Views
That's the point though, isn't it? - 08/03/2017 04:35:56 PM 789 Views
but it was the young that made it work and they are already opting out - 10/03/2017 02:56:50 PM 733 Views
it wasn't a bone - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM 870 Views
The problem withthat argument is it ignore human nature - 10/03/2017 03:18:06 PM 821 Views
I'm not ignoring it, I am illustrating it. - 10/03/2017 04:39:45 PM 773 Views
You know what I would propose? - 08/03/2017 03:06:27 PM 830 Views
decoupling health insurance from employment eliminates an existing subsidy - 08/03/2017 03:25:27 PM 753 Views
So what? - 08/03/2017 03:53:29 PM 765 Views
I wasn't raising it as a show-stopper, because obviously it isn't one. - 08/03/2017 04:17:47 PM 806 Views
As a self-employed individual, I have little sympathy for extending employer-based care - 09/03/2017 03:41:59 AM 787 Views
And it has caused the wage level to stagnate since then. - 10/03/2017 02:35:12 PM 793 Views
It is was of the many broken parts of our health care system - 10/03/2017 03:20:19 PM 772 Views
Looks good to me - 08/03/2017 03:58:48 PM 770 Views
This would solve a lot of the problems with cost and access. - 08/03/2017 04:11:15 PM 841 Views
Some serious problems - 09/03/2017 04:49:35 PM 829 Views
How do we elect you Tom? This is really good stuff. *NM* - 09/03/2017 05:25:56 PM 510 Views
As to healthcare itself, how are there no good options? - 14/03/2017 01:59:17 PM 846 Views
I'm glad you asked... - 14/03/2017 02:36:40 PM 896 Views

Reply to Message