Active Users:1079 Time:20/01/2026 07:46:10 PM
the reason why Canadians with money seek treatment in the US is not bureaucracy damookster Send a noteboard - 14/03/2017 04:00:09 PM

it's availability of services. The long wait times for digital imaging services in Canada is driven by the simple fact that we have far more such available hardware than they do in Canada.

To illustrate, I went to my primary care doctor last summer for persistent pain, tingling and numbness in my left shoulder. I was sent for x-rays and a CT scan that same day. I had an MRI three days later. Within a weeks time I had a diagnosis of brachial nerve irritation due to arthritic bone spurs in the cervical spine and a recommendation that it be treated without surgery until absolutely necessary.

Inn Canada, per a report by the Fraser Institute in November of 2016, "Canadians could expect to wait 3.7 weeks for a computed tomography (CT) scan, 11.1 weeks for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and 4.0 weeks for an ultrasound."

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Obama care repeal and replace - 07/03/2017 12:33:18 AM 962 Views
The new House version looks fine..... - 07/03/2017 03:12:55 AM 717 Views
They do expand health saving accounts *NM* - 07/03/2017 11:27:50 AM 343 Views
The "accross state lines" buzz is a farce. Do YOU want a PCP that is 800 miles away? *NM* - 07/03/2017 09:18:57 PM 380 Views
That isn't what it means at all. - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM 717 Views
But physician networks are local - 09/03/2017 04:25:33 PM 715 Views
Of course they are. - 09/03/2017 04:52:31 PM 616 Views
And your insurance premium would be WAY higher than it currently is with a native MA company. - 10/03/2017 02:21:21 PM 673 Views
The risk can be spread across networks, as it is today. - 10/03/2017 02:33:38 PM 737 Views
It only looks that way from the outside. - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM 680 Views
One breakdown - 07/03/2017 10:25:12 AM 836 Views
My head is going to blow up from reading all this news - 07/03/2017 09:16:22 PM 885 Views
From the little I understand... - 07/03/2017 10:13:01 PM 742 Views
They can make it work and will just rasie rates - 08/03/2017 03:52:50 PM 667 Views
That's the point though, isn't it? - 08/03/2017 04:35:56 PM 702 Views
but it was the young that made it work and they are already opting out - 10/03/2017 02:56:50 PM 646 Views
it wasn't a bone - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM 780 Views
The problem withthat argument is it ignore human nature - 10/03/2017 03:18:06 PM 737 Views
I'm not ignoring it, I am illustrating it. - 10/03/2017 04:39:45 PM 678 Views
You know what I would propose? - 08/03/2017 03:06:27 PM 742 Views
decoupling health insurance from employment eliminates an existing subsidy - 08/03/2017 03:25:27 PM 672 Views
So what? - 08/03/2017 03:53:29 PM 685 Views
I wasn't raising it as a show-stopper, because obviously it isn't one. - 08/03/2017 04:17:47 PM 720 Views
As a self-employed individual, I have little sympathy for extending employer-based care - 09/03/2017 03:41:59 AM 698 Views
And it has caused the wage level to stagnate since then. - 10/03/2017 02:35:12 PM 708 Views
It is was of the many broken parts of our health care system - 10/03/2017 03:20:19 PM 685 Views
Looks good to me - 08/03/2017 03:58:48 PM 694 Views
This would solve a lot of the problems with cost and access. - 08/03/2017 04:11:15 PM 745 Views
Some serious problems - 09/03/2017 04:49:35 PM 744 Views
How do we elect you Tom? This is really good stuff. *NM* - 09/03/2017 05:25:56 PM 456 Views
As to healthcare itself, how are there no good options? - 14/03/2017 01:59:17 PM 760 Views
I'm glad you asked... - 14/03/2017 02:36:40 PM 795 Views
I have heard it said that "the perfect is the enemy of the good" - 14/03/2017 03:03:34 PM 770 Views
the reason why Canadians with money seek treatment in the US is not bureaucracy - 14/03/2017 04:00:09 PM 644 Views

Reply to Message