Active Users:790 Time:25/04/2026 03:39:30 PM
the reason why Canadians with money seek treatment in the US is not bureaucracy damookster Send a noteboard - 14/03/2017 04:00:09 PM

it's availability of services. The long wait times for digital imaging services in Canada is driven by the simple fact that we have far more such available hardware than they do in Canada.

To illustrate, I went to my primary care doctor last summer for persistent pain, tingling and numbness in my left shoulder. I was sent for x-rays and a CT scan that same day. I had an MRI three days later. Within a weeks time I had a diagnosis of brachial nerve irritation due to arthritic bone spurs in the cervical spine and a recommendation that it be treated without surgery until absolutely necessary.

Inn Canada, per a report by the Fraser Institute in November of 2016, "Canadians could expect to wait 3.7 weeks for a computed tomography (CT) scan, 11.1 weeks for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and 4.0 weeks for an ultrasound."

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Obama care repeal and replace - 07/03/2017 12:33:18 AM 994 Views
The new House version looks fine..... - 07/03/2017 03:12:55 AM 756 Views
They do expand health saving accounts *NM* - 07/03/2017 11:27:50 AM 359 Views
The "accross state lines" buzz is a farce. Do YOU want a PCP that is 800 miles away? *NM* - 07/03/2017 09:18:57 PM 397 Views
That isn't what it means at all. - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM 754 Views
But physician networks are local - 09/03/2017 04:25:33 PM 749 Views
Of course they are. - 09/03/2017 04:52:31 PM 646 Views
And your insurance premium would be WAY higher than it currently is with a native MA company. - 10/03/2017 02:21:21 PM 707 Views
The risk can be spread across networks, as it is today. - 10/03/2017 02:33:38 PM 773 Views
It only looks that way from the outside. - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM 715 Views
One breakdown - 07/03/2017 10:25:12 AM 872 Views
My head is going to blow up from reading all this news - 07/03/2017 09:16:22 PM 928 Views
From the little I understand... - 07/03/2017 10:13:01 PM 779 Views
They can make it work and will just rasie rates - 08/03/2017 03:52:50 PM 704 Views
That's the point though, isn't it? - 08/03/2017 04:35:56 PM 742 Views
but it was the young that made it work and they are already opting out - 10/03/2017 02:56:50 PM 685 Views
it wasn't a bone - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM 820 Views
The problem withthat argument is it ignore human nature - 10/03/2017 03:18:06 PM 769 Views
I'm not ignoring it, I am illustrating it. - 10/03/2017 04:39:45 PM 717 Views
You know what I would propose? - 08/03/2017 03:06:27 PM 776 Views
decoupling health insurance from employment eliminates an existing subsidy - 08/03/2017 03:25:27 PM 707 Views
So what? - 08/03/2017 03:53:29 PM 716 Views
I wasn't raising it as a show-stopper, because obviously it isn't one. - 08/03/2017 04:17:47 PM 755 Views
As a self-employed individual, I have little sympathy for extending employer-based care - 09/03/2017 03:41:59 AM 735 Views
And it has caused the wage level to stagnate since then. - 10/03/2017 02:35:12 PM 740 Views
It is was of the many broken parts of our health care system - 10/03/2017 03:20:19 PM 715 Views
Looks good to me - 08/03/2017 03:58:48 PM 725 Views
This would solve a lot of the problems with cost and access. - 08/03/2017 04:11:15 PM 784 Views
Some serious problems - 09/03/2017 04:49:35 PM 776 Views
How do we elect you Tom? This is really good stuff. *NM* - 09/03/2017 05:25:56 PM 473 Views
As to healthcare itself, how are there no good options? - 14/03/2017 01:59:17 PM 792 Views
I'm glad you asked... - 14/03/2017 02:36:40 PM 835 Views
I have heard it said that "the perfect is the enemy of the good" - 14/03/2017 03:03:34 PM 806 Views
the reason why Canadians with money seek treatment in the US is not bureaucracy - 14/03/2017 04:00:09 PM 683 Views

Reply to Message