Active Users:489 Time:15/08/2026 06:35:51 AM
the reason why Canadians with money seek treatment in the US is not bureaucracy damookster Send a noteboard - 14/03/2017 04:00:09 PM

it's availability of services. The long wait times for digital imaging services in Canada is driven by the simple fact that we have far more such available hardware than they do in Canada.

To illustrate, I went to my primary care doctor last summer for persistent pain, tingling and numbness in my left shoulder. I was sent for x-rays and a CT scan that same day. I had an MRI three days later. Within a weeks time I had a diagnosis of brachial nerve irritation due to arthritic bone spurs in the cervical spine and a recommendation that it be treated without surgery until absolutely necessary.

Inn Canada, per a report by the Fraser Institute in November of 2016, "Canadians could expect to wait 3.7 weeks for a computed tomography (CT) scan, 11.1 weeks for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and 4.0 weeks for an ultrasound."

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Obama care repeal and replace - 07/03/2017 12:33:18 AM 1052 Views
The new House version looks fine..... - 07/03/2017 03:12:55 AM 807 Views
They do expand health saving accounts *NM* - 07/03/2017 11:27:50 AM 392 Views
The "accross state lines" buzz is a farce. Do YOU want a PCP that is 800 miles away? *NM* - 07/03/2017 09:18:57 PM 426 Views
That isn't what it means at all. - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM 805 Views
But physician networks are local - 09/03/2017 04:25:33 PM 808 Views
Of course they are. - 09/03/2017 04:52:31 PM 694 Views
And your insurance premium would be WAY higher than it currently is with a native MA company. - 10/03/2017 02:21:21 PM 754 Views
The risk can be spread across networks, as it is today. - 10/03/2017 02:33:38 PM 833 Views
It only looks that way from the outside. - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM 767 Views
One breakdown - 07/03/2017 10:25:12 AM 927 Views
My head is going to blow up from reading all this news - 07/03/2017 09:16:22 PM 1001 Views
From the little I understand... - 07/03/2017 10:13:01 PM 824 Views
They can make it work and will just rasie rates - 08/03/2017 03:52:50 PM 755 Views
That's the point though, isn't it? - 08/03/2017 04:35:56 PM 789 Views
but it was the young that made it work and they are already opting out - 10/03/2017 02:56:50 PM 733 Views
it wasn't a bone - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM 870 Views
The problem withthat argument is it ignore human nature - 10/03/2017 03:18:06 PM 821 Views
I'm not ignoring it, I am illustrating it. - 10/03/2017 04:39:45 PM 773 Views
You know what I would propose? - 08/03/2017 03:06:27 PM 830 Views
decoupling health insurance from employment eliminates an existing subsidy - 08/03/2017 03:25:27 PM 753 Views
So what? - 08/03/2017 03:53:29 PM 765 Views
I wasn't raising it as a show-stopper, because obviously it isn't one. - 08/03/2017 04:17:47 PM 806 Views
As a self-employed individual, I have little sympathy for extending employer-based care - 09/03/2017 03:41:59 AM 787 Views
And it has caused the wage level to stagnate since then. - 10/03/2017 02:35:12 PM 793 Views
It is was of the many broken parts of our health care system - 10/03/2017 03:20:19 PM 772 Views
Looks good to me - 08/03/2017 03:58:48 PM 770 Views
This would solve a lot of the problems with cost and access. - 08/03/2017 04:11:15 PM 841 Views
Some serious problems - 09/03/2017 04:49:35 PM 829 Views
How do we elect you Tom? This is really good stuff. *NM* - 09/03/2017 05:25:56 PM 510 Views
As to healthcare itself, how are there no good options? - 14/03/2017 01:59:17 PM 846 Views
I'm glad you asked... - 14/03/2017 02:36:40 PM 896 Views
I have heard it said that "the perfect is the enemy of the good" - 14/03/2017 03:03:34 PM 854 Views
the reason why Canadians with money seek treatment in the US is not bureaucracy - 14/03/2017 04:00:09 PM 738 Views

Reply to Message