Active Users:997 Time:20/01/2026 03:40:57 PM
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? The Shrike Send a noteboard - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM

View original post
What we learn from this:
  1. Paying out 13M dollars in settlements to make sexual harassment suits go away - cost of doing business.

  2. This becoming public knowledge resulting in the loss of 50 sponsors in less that 3 weeks - This behavior is unacceptable!!


Once again proving that how much profit you are generating is truly the most important Factor.


Fox needs fresh blood. Tucker Carlson better represents many younger Republicans who are socially more liberal and just as economically conservative. The cultural wars are mostly over. And FOX needs people who get that and focus on what matters the most to their base.

This message last edited by The Shrike on 20/04/2017 at 03:19:54 PM
Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 1112 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 891 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 923 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 853 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 792 Views
My guess is 2 - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 760 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 823 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 831 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 801 Views
Horse shit - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 939 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 774 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 790 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 936 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 510 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 810 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 826 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 768 Views
Regarding corporate policy - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 846 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 718 Views
The company isn't stupid - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 785 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 901 Views
Your points are pointless - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 980 Views
We are debating different things - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 735 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 863 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 688 Views
I agree with you - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 783 Views
So??/ - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 874 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 325 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 720 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 822 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 816 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 749 Views
Agreed - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 752 Views
It did have that vibe - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 871 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 775 Views

Reply to Message