Active Users:731 Time:25/04/2026 11:47:29 AM
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? The Shrike Send a noteboard - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM

View original post
What we learn from this:
  1. Paying out 13M dollars in settlements to make sexual harassment suits go away - cost of doing business.

  2. This becoming public knowledge resulting in the loss of 50 sponsors in less that 3 weeks - This behavior is unacceptable!!


Once again proving that how much profit you are generating is truly the most important Factor.


Fox needs fresh blood. Tucker Carlson better represents many younger Republicans who are socially more liberal and just as economically conservative. The cultural wars are mostly over. And FOX needs people who get that and focus on what matters the most to their base.

This message last edited by The Shrike on 20/04/2017 at 03:19:54 PM
Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 1159 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 939 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 973 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 899 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 836 Views
My guess is 2 - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 805 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 864 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 868 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 843 Views
Horse shit - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 992 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 826 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 836 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 977 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 529 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 859 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 874 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 815 Views
Regarding corporate policy - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 889 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 770 Views
The company isn't stupid - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 830 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 946 Views
Your points are pointless - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 1032 Views
We are debating different things - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 784 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 909 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 731 Views
I agree with you - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 836 Views
So??/ - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 922 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 341 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 772 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 895 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 862 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 791 Views
Agreed - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 803 Views
It did have that vibe - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 927 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 815 Views

Reply to Message