Active Users:457 Time:04/08/2026 07:11:58 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Your points are pointless random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM

View original postFirst of all he's not even that good. Why bother? To attract his audience to the Democrats? Ummm, that's not happening.

He still had an audience that is about the size of CNNs total primetime audience. Your opinion of him his completely irrelevant. He has millions of people who listen to him and probably almost as many who hate him for what he says and want him off the air. Those are the people who got him fired not the people who watch. If you work to get someone silenced because you don't like his message that is censorship.
No they won't all become democrats but that doesn't change the tingles the left gets for getting kicked off the air.


View original postSecond, most if not all big corporations at least claim that they have a zero tolerance policy for sexual harassment. In O'Reilly's case that happened at Fox after he ceased being their chief rainmaker.

The only reason he isn't the rainmaker is people who don't watch his shows threatened his sponsors. Alec Baldwin is on tape calling his daughter a stupid pig and he is selling how many things on TV? This has nothing to do with what Bill did and everything about who he is. You can argue that it is justified censorship but to refuse to accept that it is censorship is ignoring the political reality of the situation. The same corporations who claim they are so offended by O'Reilly kneel and kiss Clinton's ring, when they are kissing more intimate places.

Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack damookster - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 1206 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... Anonymous2000 - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 988 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal random thoughts - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 1020 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 Roland00 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 949 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved damookster - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 878 Views
My guess is 2 Tom - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 853 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved Roland00 - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 908 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship random thoughts - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 913 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. The Shrike - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 884 Views
Horse shit random thoughts - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 1040 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! The Shrike - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 882 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? The Shrike - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 890 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other random thoughts - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 1024 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* The Shrike - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 555 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship Roland00 - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 906 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? damookster - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 917 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do Tom - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 860 Views
Regarding corporate policy damookster - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 938 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation Tom - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 816 Views
The company isn't stupid damookster - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 883 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. random thoughts - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 997 Views
Your points are pointless random thoughts - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 1079 Views
We are debating different things damookster - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 827 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? random thoughts - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 961 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject Roland00 - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 777 Views
I agree with you damookster - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 884 Views
So??/ random thoughts - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 971 Views
You want a world that is objective, that people do not make decisions and opinions based off Roland00 - 21/04/2017 04:55:08 PM 929 Views
Nope just want you to admit that this is about who he is more than what he did but I know you can't *NM* random thoughts - 21/04/2017 05:55:51 PM 540 Views
I told you my meaning and what motivates me Roland00 - 21/04/2017 07:54:05 PM 851 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* Ghavrel - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 363 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" Tom - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 810 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books damookster - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 945 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? random thoughts - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 918 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? The Shrike - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 841 Views
Agreed damookster - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 842 Views
It did have that vibe Jeordam - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 978 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. HyogaRott - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 867 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes