Active Users:412 Time:17/06/2025 06:36:43 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Legolas Send a noteboard - 13/10/2009 04:21:55 PM

The other two candidates were Sarkozy and Tsvangirai. Sarkozy has seriously done nothing for peace, and Tsvangirai is a puppet for a still reigning tyrant.

There's no one who's contributed seriously to world peace in the past year, but of those three I'd also choose Obama.

I'd give out the Peace prize once every 5 or 10 years if I had a choice. From the trends, it seems that such exceptional human beings don't appear on an annual basis, and the award invariably cheapens due to poor availability of candidates.


So you can't tell me that there were no serious or deserving candidates - MSF, Red Cross, Amnesty International, Oxfam and many others are there even if nobody else is, and I'm sure there are many people who've been doing good work, even if it's in smaller countries that don't get much media attention. People have gotten the Nobel Prize in recent years for promoting the peace in Timor-Leste, in Guatemala, and other small countries; there's no reason why the committee has to pick someone famous or known worldwide.
Reply to message
So, I was discussing Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize with a friend and... Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 05:01:38 PM 794 Views
I don't think so. He's trying to rationalise. *NM* AgentOrange - 12/10/2009 05:03:46 PM 195 Views
I think this was actually the Nobel Committee's rationale, wasn't it? beetnemesis - 12/10/2009 05:06:12 PM 508 Views
No. Ouranid - 12/10/2009 06:26:47 PM 541 Views
Has some truth I think, yeah. *NM* Legolas - 12/10/2009 05:09:18 PM 198 Views
wait. Obama won the peace prize? *NM* jh - 12/10/2009 05:18:12 PM 190 Views
He got it for bombing the moon. *NM* Jragghen - 12/10/2009 06:14:10 PM 208 Views
I heard it was hiding WMDs. *NM* Craig - 12/10/2009 08:18:19 PM 204 Views
Well, it wouldn't allow the UN inspectors in so what would you think? *NM* Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 08:34:11 PM 217 Views
maybe? *NM* temeraire - 12/10/2009 05:20:38 PM 218 Views
I think your friend is right in part random thoughts - 12/10/2009 05:32:19 PM 554 Views
From a CNN article: Aemon - 12/10/2009 05:57:22 PM 527 Views
Re: From a CNN article: Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 07:11:19 PM 510 Views
Mmmmnah Camilla - 12/10/2009 06:11:15 PM 566 Views
And that my second reaction *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 09:01:45 PM 205 Views
His was actually my first reaction too *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 08:15:20 PM 205 Views
No one currently fighting two wars should win. Ever. *NM* Joker - 12/10/2009 08:17:47 PM 217 Views
I can't really agree nossy - 12/10/2009 09:04:54 PM 519 Views
No, I don't buy it. *NM* everynametaken - 13/10/2009 02:51:54 AM 187 Views
Obama was probably the best available choice Sidious - 13/10/2009 05:26:26 AM 545 Views
and you would give it to Obama for? *NM* random thoughts - 13/10/2009 03:58:22 PM 188 Views
Do you have a source for that? Sareitha Sedai - 13/10/2009 04:03:47 PM 493 Views
Re: Do you have a source for that? Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:25:14 AM 627 Views
Ah. I thought you had info on the short list. Sareitha Sedai - 14/10/2009 02:53:53 PM 498 Views
There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Legolas - 13/10/2009 04:21:55 PM 491 Views
Re: There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:23:54 AM 508 Views
If it was "given to the American voters," the I want my share of the prize money. Palatine - 13/10/2009 04:01:12 PM 526 Views
He promises change.... Mats imaginary friend - 14/10/2009 05:51:07 AM 574 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes