Active Users:568 Time:01/12/2025 02:30:17 PM
Then lets change the way things work. Not as if capitalism is required by the US constition. imlad Send a noteboard - 15/10/2009 07:04:51 PM
Nor is capitalism something that falls in line well with Christianity, which is the predominant creed of people in the Capitalist West (ie: America).

A serious CHANGE is needed in this country, and not just the change of political parties.

Capitalism is an oppressive economic system that helps only those who have money (capital), leaving the rest to suffer, or hope for that 1-in-a-million stroke of luck.

Greed isn't a poor term for it, but people are not going to suddenly do this because it's what they "should" be doing. I don't think that's a valid argument, since we know the system does not work that way.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
Oh...by the way...we may have been wrong about that whole "Global Warming" thing - 14/10/2009 03:23:53 PM 1360 Views
This was posted on 10.10.09 by Trzkaska2000. 138 views. 15 replies. - 14/10/2009 03:32:52 PM 543 Views
Your point being...? *NM* - 14/10/2009 03:53:56 PM 218 Views
That your post is repetitive. - 14/10/2009 05:33:05 PM 504 Views
I didn't see Traszka's post.. - 14/10/2009 06:34:05 PM 510 Views
Within a decade, the North Pole will be ice-free during the summer - 14/10/2009 03:35:31 PM 631 Views
what were the odds that they would have found anything else? - 14/10/2009 03:58:49 PM 542 Views
Re: Oh...by the way...we may have been wrong about that whole "Global Warming" thing - 14/10/2009 04:36:57 PM 553 Views
I registered it as a bug - 14/10/2009 04:40:20 PM 461 Views
I think it's been registered as a bug about 6 times now. *NM* - 14/10/2009 05:52:04 PM 219 Views
I personally did it four times. *NM* - 14/10/2009 11:29:53 PM 250 Views
Possible Consequences of taking global warming seriously... - 14/10/2009 04:37:32 PM 558 Views
Increased cost for everyone - 14/10/2009 04:42:07 PM 505 Views
Increased costs? - 14/10/2009 05:11:11 PM 549 Views
You misunderstand my position. - 14/10/2009 05:23:29 PM 546 Views
greed - 14/10/2009 06:45:35 PM 498 Views
That's not how things work. - 14/10/2009 06:50:27 PM 474 Views
Then lets change the way things work. Not as if capitalism is required by the US constition. - 15/10/2009 07:04:51 PM 450 Views
Good luck with that. - 15/10/2009 07:18:17 PM 573 Views
Welcome to Communism! - 14/10/2009 09:45:02 PM 466 Views
communism is a system of government. SOCIALISM is an economic system - 15/10/2009 07:01:16 PM 487 Views
I'm Canadian, actually. - 23/10/2009 11:08:08 PM 451 Views
it's about the science, for me. - 14/10/2009 04:46:09 PM 497 Views
Other Possible Consequences of taking global warming seriously... - 14/10/2009 06:33:38 PM 492 Views
+1 - 14/10/2009 06:46:11 PM 470 Views
So you decided to ignore my response? - 14/10/2009 07:02:01 PM 493 Views
No, I just think it's gonna pay off in the long run - 14/10/2009 07:21:04 PM 505 Views
+ 1 I agree with you completely in here. - 14/10/2009 08:19:45 PM 476 Views
So, I guess you are now a Catholic? - 14/10/2009 09:49:21 PM 554 Views
Bitch, please. - 14/10/2009 09:58:07 PM 510 Views
No worries, most catholics aren't even catholics..... *NM* - 15/10/2009 05:47:58 AM 183 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 15/10/2009 08:44:44 AM 269 Views
I hope you're not suggesting the Global Warming is only a rallying cry for the Right? - 14/10/2009 09:48:22 PM 511 Views
It looked like he was saying the opposite. - 14/10/2009 10:18:03 PM 478 Views
The ends don't justify the means..... - 14/10/2009 09:41:47 PM 528 Views
You missed my point... - 15/10/2009 04:18:11 PM 438 Views
- 14/10/2009 08:07:54 PM 479 Views
No worries, it's worth a second post!!! AGW is total BS..... - 14/10/2009 09:39:20 PM 580 Views
+1 *NM* - 14/10/2009 09:49:01 PM 212 Views
Well, it's good to see that some folks still actually follow science rather than politics - 16/10/2009 05:04:17 PM 533 Views
Well said, couldn't have said it better *NM* - 17/10/2009 02:27:14 AM 209 Views

Reply to Message