Active Users:449 Time:01/07/2025 06:50:22 PM
Re: I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk nossy Send a noteboard - 20/10/2009 04:35:35 PM
except that one of the specialists in animal virology has made the same claims.

Do you know who it was? Someone from your school?
Reply to message
Innoculation misinformation - 20/10/2009 04:14:58 PM 747 Views
I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:34:03 PM 363 Views
Re: I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:35:35 PM 343 Views
oh yah sorry i forgot those words even though i said them in my head - 20/10/2009 04:44:05 PM 338 Views
do you remember anything of what he said, specifically? - 20/10/2009 04:51:00 PM 338 Views
he wrote an article for our school newspaper - 20/10/2009 05:03:15 PM 329 Views
Excellent. - 20/10/2009 04:41:27 PM 315 Views
Their explanation on Thimerosol isn't really comforting. - 20/10/2009 04:57:22 PM 370 Views
I had the same thought. - 20/10/2009 05:03:37 PM 356 Views
*gasp* you mean you didn't DIE???? - 20/10/2009 05:04:15 PM 313 Views
<shrug> I'll be getting it regardless - 20/10/2009 06:25:52 PM 353 Views
not really that weird. - 20/10/2009 09:13:27 PM 332 Views
I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 12:56:40 AM 322 Views
Re: I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 01:08:50 AM 336 Views
In Sweden it does contain squalene - 20/10/2009 06:04:08 PM 606 Views
In the US, we're apparently not allowed to add it. - 20/10/2009 06:10:06 PM 371 Views

Reply to Message