I think it is a completely unwarranted invasion of privacy and I see no reason why it is anyone's business if Bob the plumber is a member of any particular political party any more than it is their business if he likes bacon sandwiches or prefers tea to coffee - if he wants people to know, then he can tell them. The only exception should be if they are a politician or a figure who is required to be impartial (judges etc)
Then there is the second factor - I don't put a whole lot of faith in some random list on the internet where there is no check on the reliability of that list. It could be 100% fake, 75% fake, 25% fake and there is no way of knowing, nor of objecting for people it is untrue about.
Then there is the second factor - I don't put a whole lot of faith in some random list on the internet where there is no check on the reliability of that list. It could be 100% fake, 75% fake, 25% fake and there is no way of knowing, nor of objecting for people it is untrue about.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Question Time and the BNP
- 22/10/2009 07:29:34 PM
960 Views
I think you gain more letting them speak them trying to silience them
- 22/10/2009 07:58:52 PM
638 Views
They like ratings.
- 22/10/2009 08:22:59 PM
658 Views
*NM*
*NM*
It's funny how equality means they have to let anti-equality groups on *NM*
- 22/10/2009 08:27:14 PM
239 Views
I think it's a good call from the BBC, and I do intend to watch it.
- 22/10/2009 08:41:25 PM
536 Views
Sorry, we're 20 years behind the rest of Europe because we have a system that makes it hard...
- 22/10/2009 10:33:08 PM
558 Views
I rather liked (if I can be forgiven for sounding like a broken record) ...
- 22/10/2009 10:57:10 PM
787 Views
BNP membership list
- 22/10/2009 11:01:34 PM
703 Views
I find the leaking of that to be disturbing.
- 23/10/2009 01:38:09 PM
620 Views
I agree
- 26/10/2009 12:26:05 PM
514 Views
That was really quite disappointing.
- 22/10/2009 11:42:58 PM
598 Views
I thought it was perfectly executed.
- 22/10/2009 11:58:18 PM
569 Views
That's why I said it'd have been much more interesting without him.
- 23/10/2009 12:33:57 AM
682 Views
I think it exposed him as an non-viable alternative
- 23/10/2009 12:54:57 AM
702 Views
You clearly watched a different programme to me. *NM*
- 23/10/2009 12:57:59 AM
291 Views
At which point did it show he was anywhere near capable of being a serious politician
- 23/10/2009 01:15:20 AM
544 Views
At which point do you think any rational human being thought he was a serious politician?
- 23/10/2009 01:21:38 AM
718 Views
I think the Radio 1 interview a few weeks back did a better job of exposing their lunacy.
- 23/10/2009 01:06:19 AM
680 Views
Went about how I expected
- 23/10/2009 12:16:50 PM
661 Views
Pretty much my thoughts exactly
- 23/10/2009 01:22:56 PM
636 Views
Re: Pretty much my thoughts exactly
- 23/10/2009 02:14:50 PM
706 Views
I think we liked and disliked the same thing for the same reasons 
- 23/10/2009 03:07:00 PM
653 Views
- 23/10/2009 03:07:00 PM
653 Views
I've already seen BBC interviews today out on the street
- 23/10/2009 02:14:13 PM
626 Views
It will be interesting to see any polls done, to see the actual impact.
- 23/10/2009 02:55:49 PM
635 Views