I could (sort of) understand it if the biological "father" as you call him were involved in the child's life, but he's not. He left 5 years ago and has never seen the child since. Why should he get the privilege of that little boy having his name, when he clearly hasn't earned it? And of what use is it to the boy to carry the name of somebody who made the choice to have nothing to do with him?
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Changing your child's name...
- 02/11/2009 11:07:40 PM
1091 Views
Is your brother going to actually adopt the child?
- 02/11/2009 11:54:20 PM
887 Views
My brother wants to, but...
- 03/11/2009 11:18:20 PM
820 Views
Does he pay child support?
- 04/11/2009 12:38:33 AM
725 Views
Never paid a dime.
- 04/11/2009 12:44:40 AM
721 Views
I'd only change the name if he adopted the son legally.
- 03/11/2009 12:23:08 AM
756 Views
I'm more interested in the feelings/needs of the child than the feelings of adults.
- 03/11/2009 01:16:49 AM
756 Views
My sister changed her name when she ascended to the Crystal Throne, may she live forever.
- 03/11/2009 02:52:35 AM
862 Views
I personally believe the boy should keep his biological fathers last name no matter what *NM*
- 03/11/2009 03:18:24 AM
344 Views
I'm curious why you believe this.
- 03/11/2009 01:54:40 PM
728 Views
Are they changing his name to Clark Kent? If so, I don't think the kid will have a problem. *NM*
- 03/11/2009 04:04:35 AM
331 Views
I gave She her dad's last name, we weren't married, had no real intentions of getting married,
- 03/11/2009 05:10:31 AM
735 Views
Here are my thoughts (I have been in a somewhat similar situation).
- 03/11/2009 06:52:17 AM
840 Views