Active Users:175 Time:18/05/2024 11:37:03 PM
I think i see what you are talking about, thanks. *NM* Blaine Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 07:05:04 AM
Also, your conception of 1950s marriage is fairly caricatured. Although the topic of your paper suggests you realize that, you should acknowledge it.
Reply to message
What do you think of this intro? - 14/12/2009 06:14:51 AM 592 Views
I'm not a fan of the first two sentences. - 14/12/2009 06:42:10 AM 367 Views
Well, i know for a fact that he doesn't opening with questions - 14/12/2009 07:02:03 AM 474 Views
Ahhh, one of those professors. - 14/12/2009 07:22:46 AM 353 Views
Being sneaky, hmmm. I like this idea. *NM* - 14/12/2009 07:59:39 AM 178 Views
Sentence fragments are unacceptable in technical writing. You need to fix that. - 14/12/2009 06:51:05 AM 362 Views
I think i see what you are talking about, thanks. *NM* - 14/12/2009 07:05:04 AM 189 Views
It's like a Pleasentville film review. *NM* - 14/12/2009 09:54:14 AM 143 Views
I actually mention it a few times later. *NM* - 14/12/2009 08:48:11 PM 188 Views
I want to stick a wikipedia-style "who?" in there. - 14/12/2009 10:53:02 AM 348 Views
That's actually how we're taught to write in American high schools... - 14/12/2009 02:39:56 PM 343 Views
Part of my problem is that he hasn't told me what level this is for. - 14/12/2009 03:04:40 PM 323 Views
Aye, but it's an intro. - 15/12/2009 08:07:38 AM 291 Views
You presume correctly - 15/12/2009 02:19:07 PM 384 Views
I smell a strawman... - 15/12/2009 02:25:36 AM 350 Views
Stylistically it needs a lot of work. - 15/12/2009 03:28:24 AM 403 Views
Wow, thanks *NM* - 15/12/2009 02:22:48 PM 198 Views
That was a good critique. *NM* - 16/12/2009 01:21:28 AM 140 Views

Reply to Message