I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
The senate was designed to slow things down and provide stability. When the constitution was written the federal government was small and had limited power it only makes sense that as the power of the federal government grew the ability of the senate to slow it down has grown as well.
I think there really are two arguments here.
First, should the senate have rules that allow a large minority group to block major legislation? I think it should have some mechanism in place to do that.
The second argument is should it be so easy and there I agree with you. The minority party should not be allowed to play the role pure obstructionist and simply block every thing that comes down the pipe. I would have no problem if they made them actually get up there and talk not stop for days on end.
I think the real solution though is both sides to learn to be less partisan. Republicans are getting away with it this cycle but if all they call point out is things they have stopped they will have a toughs time come 2012 and if all the dems can do is complain that the republicans stopped them it could be tough on incumbents all around. If unemployment is still over 8% come 2012 finger pointing and excuses won’t get you much.
I think there really are two arguments here.
First, should the senate have rules that allow a large minority group to block major legislation? I think it should have some mechanism in place to do that.
The second argument is should it be so easy and there I agree with you. The minority party should not be allowed to play the role pure obstructionist and simply block every thing that comes down the pipe. I would have no problem if they made them actually get up there and talk not stop for days on end.
I think the real solution though is both sides to learn to be less partisan. Republicans are getting away with it this cycle but if all they call point out is things they have stopped they will have a toughs time come 2012 and if all the dems can do is complain that the republicans stopped them it could be tough on incumbents all around. If unemployment is still over 8% come 2012 finger pointing and excuses won’t get you much.
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat?
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
655 Views
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
655 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
- 18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
245 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
- 18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
244 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
- 18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
254 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
- 18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
252 Views
It makes people question their priorities
- 18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
318 Views
Maybe they should.
- 18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
274 Views
You act like America is a collective
- 18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
331 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
- 18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
239 Views
Tort reform
- 18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
231 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
111 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
- 18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
232 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
- 18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
232 Views
that simply proves they are inept
- 19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
229 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
- 19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
254 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
- 19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
290 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
- 19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
314 Views
Curious about the last part.
- 20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
322 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
- 20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
232 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
- 20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
294 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
- 19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
369 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
- 20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
225 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
- 20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
216 Views
I know who I'm voting for!
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
273 Views
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
273 Views
I'm starting to think.....
- 18/01/2010 04:33:23 PM
263 Views
Certainly, he wouldn't stand a chance without protest votes. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 04:45:37 PM
117 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
- 18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
332 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
- 18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
314 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
- 18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
336 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
- 18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
314 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
- 18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
262 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
- 18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
249 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
- 18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
246 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
- 19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
350 Views

