Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
Legolas Send a noteboard - 18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
Or, if they don't care that much about the non-insured, then what are they at least offering to lessen the enormous costs in percentage of GDP that the US spends on health care?
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat? 
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
729 Views
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
729 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
- 18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
322 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
- 18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
310 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
- 18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
323 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
- 18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
320 Views
It makes people question their priorities
- 18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
387 Views
Maybe they should.
- 18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
347 Views
You act like America is a collective
- 18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
398 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
- 18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
322 Views
Tort reform
- 18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
302 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
149 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
- 18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
304 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
- 18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
305 Views
that simply proves they are inept
- 19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
309 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
- 19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
325 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
- 19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
368 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
- 19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
390 Views
Curious about the last part.
- 20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
394 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
- 20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
301 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
- 20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
369 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
- 19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
450 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
- 20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
306 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
- 20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
297 Views
I know who I'm voting for! 
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
339 Views
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
339 Views
I'm starting to think.....
- 18/01/2010 04:33:23 PM
333 Views
Certainly, he wouldn't stand a chance without protest votes. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 04:45:37 PM
151 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
- 18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
405 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
- 18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
389 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
- 18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
409 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
- 18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
386 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
- 18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
338 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
- 18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
327 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
- 18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
329 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
- 19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
416 Views