Active Users:2534 Time:19/06/2026 10:13:10 AM
I agree with tom Roland00 Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM
How can you count an attack by Islamists that killed around 3,000 people as "one incident" and a pipe bomb at an abortion clinic that kills one person (or maybe just injures people) as "one incident"?

Oklahoma City was the only significant terrorist attack against the United States since 1980 that was not conducted by Islamists. Period.


but with only one change. Replace Significant with the word Massive or something similar.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 2038 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 686 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 801 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 737 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 705 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 723 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 290 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 688 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 309 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 819 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 705 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 318 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 741 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 749 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 296 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 701 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 811 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 757 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 878 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 796 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 837 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 712 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 706 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 706 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 888 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 713 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 758 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 943 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 854 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 1048 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 886 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 650 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 815 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 726 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 299 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 310 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 658 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 722 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 759 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 496 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 712 Views

Reply to Message