Active Users:1287 Time:07/03/2026 05:26:09 AM
I agree with tom Roland00 Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM
How can you count an attack by Islamists that killed around 3,000 people as "one incident" and a pipe bomb at an abortion clinic that kills one person (or maybe just injures people) as "one incident"?

Oklahoma City was the only significant terrorist attack against the United States since 1980 that was not conducted by Islamists. Period.


but with only one change. Replace Significant with the word Massive or something similar.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1968 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 631 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 743 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 689 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 651 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 675 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 258 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 637 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 277 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 764 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 656 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 286 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 689 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 705 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 265 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 645 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 758 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 699 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 824 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 740 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 785 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 658 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 647 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 644 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 828 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 658 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 704 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 858 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 799 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 987 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 821 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 601 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 759 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 674 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 270 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 281 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 605 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 665 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 698 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 465 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 650 Views

Reply to Message