Active Users:1082 Time:03/05/2026 05:44:33 PM
I agree with tom Roland00 Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM
How can you count an attack by Islamists that killed around 3,000 people as "one incident" and a pipe bomb at an abortion clinic that kills one person (or maybe just injures people) as "one incident"?

Oklahoma City was the only significant terrorist attack against the United States since 1980 that was not conducted by Islamists. Period.


but with only one change. Replace Significant with the word Massive or something similar.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 2006 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 658 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 775 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 709 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 676 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 698 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 271 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 662 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 290 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 791 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 682 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 302 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 716 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 728 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 277 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 674 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 785 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 732 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 851 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 769 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 813 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 689 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 681 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 679 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 860 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 685 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 733 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 915 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 831 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 1020 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 855 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 626 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 787 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 696 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 282 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 292 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 636 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 699 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 732 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 476 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 684 Views

Reply to Message