Active Users:2661 Time:19/06/2026 11:43:35 AM
You would be very wrong random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM
the majority of attacks have been against civilians. At the height of the violence they were finds around 100 bodies a day and that doesn't count the thousands that were killed by car bombs. They are still blowing up markets.

The vast majority of Muslim terrorist attacks are committed against other Muslim not the “occupiers” who were trying to prevent it.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 2039 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 688 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 803 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 739 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 706 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 725 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 290 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 691 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 309 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 821 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 707 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 318 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 742 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 750 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 296 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 702 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 814 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 759 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 880 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 798 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 837 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 715 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 707 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 706 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 889 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 713 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 760 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 945 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 856 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 1050 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 888 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 650 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 816 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 727 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 299 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 310 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 660 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 722 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 760 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 496 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 714 Views

Reply to Message