Active Users:590 Time:03/08/2026 11:34:57 PM
You would be very wrong random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM
the majority of attacks have been against civilians. At the height of the violence they were finds around 100 bodies a day and that doesn't count the thousands that were killed by car bombs. They are still blowing up markets.

The vast majority of Muslim terrorist attacks are committed against other Muslim not the “occupiers” who were trying to prevent it.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 2080 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 719 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 838 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 770 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 730 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 761 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 307 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 719 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 328 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 864 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 737 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 333 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 772 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 786 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 310 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 741 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 851 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 789 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 914 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 825 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 875 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 750 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 759 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 742 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 924 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 742 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 798 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 978 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 898 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 1088 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 918 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 683 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 857 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 754 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 314 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 329 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 691 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 761 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 800 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 517 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 739 Views

Reply to Message