Active Users:479 Time:03/05/2025 01:30:23 PM
You would be very wrong random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM
the majority of attacks have been against civilians. At the height of the violence they were finds around 100 bodies a day and that doesn't count the thousands that were killed by car bombs. They are still blowing up markets.

The vast majority of Muslim terrorist attacks are committed against other Muslim not the “occupiers” who were trying to prevent it.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1792 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 477 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 590 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 540 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 507 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 524 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 203 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 487 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 209 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 602 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 500 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 216 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 519 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 544 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 200 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 500 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 587 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 544 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 663 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 585 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 616 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 494 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 484 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 494 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 664 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 496 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 557 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 679 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 631 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 826 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 668 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 450 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 602 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 539 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 200 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 218 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 461 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 498 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 546 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 392 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 485 Views

Reply to Message