Active Users:545 Time:18/09/2026 06:44:51 AM
You would be very wrong random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM
the majority of attacks have been against civilians. At the height of the violence they were finds around 100 bodies a day and that doesn't count the thousands that were killed by car bombs. They are still blowing up markets.

The vast majority of Muslim terrorist attacks are committed against other Muslim not the “occupiers” who were trying to prevent it.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 2108 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 741 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 871 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 792 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 751 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 786 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 322 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 738 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 339 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 891 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 756 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 344 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 794 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 810 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 319 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 774 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 880 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 821 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 939 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 848 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 904 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 774 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 784 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 772 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 944 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 765 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 825 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 1000 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 928 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 1115 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 952 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 706 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 889 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 778 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 325 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 338 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 710 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 798 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 826 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 529 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 761 Views

Reply to Message