rules that prevent fraternization have worked in other militaries, such as Britain. This is much better than a blanket rule saying no gays allowed.
And the current policy doesn't prevent fraternization, if both soldiers are discrete they can fraternize, they only get punished if they get caught.
--------------------
Daylight is a good thing,
Hiding, Fear, and a policy based off mistruth are not good things.
And the current policy doesn't prevent fraternization, if both soldiers are discrete they can fraternize, they only get punished if they get caught.
--------------------
Daylight is a good thing,
Hiding, Fear, and a policy based off mistruth are not good things.
Gays in military ruling creates dilemma for brass
- 07/03/2010 12:34:19 AM
841 Views
Can't be that hard to prove.
- 07/03/2010 12:53:13 AM
411 Views
Do you think...
- 07/03/2010 01:01:25 AM
430 Views
Okay try...
- 07/03/2010 01:04:31 AM
367 Views
Except...
- 07/03/2010 01:13:01 AM
372 Views
I have mixed feelings on the policy
- 07/03/2010 01:05:44 AM
483 Views
Most solider's aren't going to come out just because the policy changes
- 07/03/2010 03:10:12 AM
482 Views
Re: Most solider's aren't going to come out just because the policy changes
- 07/03/2010 03:31:53 AM
388 Views
*NM*
*NM*
I think you are overly hopeful about what repealing it would do
- 07/03/2010 05:06:23 AM
512 Views
I'm against DADT in principle
- 07/03/2010 02:29:33 AM
454 Views
So a blanket rule is so much better
- 07/03/2010 03:14:17 AM
363 Views