Active Users:590 Time:14/10/2025 09:01:55 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Line 1 Talic Send a noteboard - 18/03/2010 07:14:56 AM
1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces.


Last I checked Al'Qaeda is a party to the conflict, and is itself a militia force.



Article 4
This message last edited by Talic on 18/03/2010 at 07:27:20 AM
Reply to message
AG Eric Holder evades questioning Isaac - 17/03/2010 05:34:40 PM 799 Views
Why should he be read miranda rights? Talic - 17/03/2010 05:50:29 PM 581 Views
Why should location matter when dealing with a borderless threat like al-Qaeda? *NM* beckstcw - 17/03/2010 10:20:08 PM 221 Views
You'd rather he walk free on a technicality? Tim - 17/03/2010 11:28:30 PM 535 Views
Line 1 Talic - 18/03/2010 07:14:56 AM 712 Views
Last I checked, al-Qaeda isn't a party to the Geneva Convention. Tim - 18/03/2010 09:16:15 AM 605 Views
I suppose I must concede however, ...... Talic - 18/03/2010 10:20:40 AM 653 Views
just to play devil's advocate... moondog - 18/03/2010 05:18:16 PM 529 Views
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game. Cannoli - 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM 531 Views
Well, I guess it depends whether you want to try him, doesn't it? Tim - 19/03/2010 11:34:34 PM 507 Views
Not to mention Miranda is crap anyway. Cannoli - 19/03/2010 10:18:46 PM 512 Views
*shrugs* snoopcester - 17/03/2010 11:10:47 PM 541 Views
That doesn't seem very logical Isaac - 18/03/2010 12:03:21 AM 628 Views
That is honest and it wouldn't be "dumb" (I assume you actually mean stupid, rather than mute) snoopcester - 18/03/2010 12:19:58 AM 585 Views
In this case ironically both might be applicable Isaac - 18/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 509 Views
It is very possible Roland00 - 18/03/2010 02:12:21 AM 496 Views
Re: It is very possible Isaac - 18/03/2010 02:31:59 AM 598 Views
You do remember "I do not recall" Gonzalez right? *NM* Roland00 - 18/03/2010 02:38:48 AM 235 Views
Actually not really, I was out of the country for almost his entire tenure Isaac - 18/03/2010 02:41:13 AM 525 Views
Pretty much there was some political firings of Us Attorneys Roland00 - 18/03/2010 02:56:01 AM 538 Views
I remember a little of that Isaac - 18/03/2010 03:16:27 AM 514 Views
Gonzales flat out lied to congress Roland00 - 18/03/2010 03:29:14 AM 504 Views
Seems he could answer the question without evasion or producing a soundbite Isaac - 18/03/2010 04:12:04 AM 572 Views
I don't think I agree with that. Legolas - 18/03/2010 02:04:48 PM 517 Views
Fair enough snoopcester - 18/03/2010 02:40:42 PM 523 Views
You guys are forgetting the intel aspect. beckstcw - 18/03/2010 09:40:53 PM 539 Views
do we know how much he actually knows? LadyLorraine - 18/03/2010 09:49:50 PM 517 Views
Kinda hard to find out if he knows anything if he's dead *NM* Isaac - 18/03/2010 09:56:18 PM 222 Views
that was totally not my question LadyLorraine - 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM 524 Views
So in sum you are saying Roland00 - 19/03/2010 12:20:27 AM 520 Views
LOL, it wasn't exactly clear Isaac - 19/03/2010 01:42:18 AM 512 Views
Yah, I was just curious how much we were assuming he knew LadyLorraine - 19/03/2010 03:05:26 AM 489 Views
Most people include congressmen/women don't understand Miranda rights,most people don't know the Law Roland00 - 18/03/2010 02:08:10 AM 593 Views
It amazes me that people do not understand them. PerrinWT - 18/03/2010 06:40:50 AM 531 Views
Oh my god, an actual intelligent explanation of Miranda rights Libby - 18/03/2010 11:24:48 PM 526 Views
I can understand why he'd want to evade answering. LadyLorraine - 18/03/2010 03:23:04 AM 588 Views
I can understand why statesman would want to avoid painting himself into a corner. Joel - 29/03/2010 02:26:34 PM 475 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes