Active Users:1402 Time:22/10/2025 09:39:05 PM
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. Tim Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM
In this advert, "blackness" as a quality of the music (whatever that may mean) is presented in a positive way. If it's racist against anyone, it's non-blacks.

What I mean by this is that it would be consistent with the implications of the advert to say "There's too much damn whiteness in this music; let's get rid of it" (not that they do say that, but they could without contradicting themselves). Similarly with "Indian-ness", "Chinese-ness" or whatever. But they couldn't say "There's too much damn blackness in this music; let's get rid of it" without effectively saying the opposite of what the advert suggests.

America: Seriously, I can understand why you guys are so hypersensitive about anything to do with race, but it's still really annoying. And it doesn't help you get over your problems.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 2891 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 826 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 881 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 967 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 911 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 832 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 935 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 765 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 723 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 788 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 461 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 813 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 958 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 763 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 796 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 827 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 827 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 446 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 448 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 427 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 804 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 820 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 980 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 832 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 1062 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 774 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 789 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 819 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 922 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 1051 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 1156 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 810 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 842 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 1070 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 777 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 863 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 869 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 899 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 933 Views

Reply to Message