Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
Oh, I agree that such an ad would never see the light of day here, but certain things said/shown here would not be broadcast there, either. It's just different in what's acceptable and what is not. Cultural differences, more or less.
Oh, and as far as I can recall, there wasn't a history of racial segregation in Western Europe on the scale that there was here in the US through the mid-20th century. That and the lack of identifiable civil rights leaders may have something to do with it as well.
Oh, and as far as I can recall, there wasn't a history of racial segregation in Western Europe on the scale that there was here in the US through the mid-20th century. That and the lack of identifiable civil rights leaders may have something to do with it as well.
I see I see. I've always thought we're a little too sensitive to racial tensions here in the US, but there are times when europeans seem to do things that are downright offensive. The spanish basketball team to name one (I'm not sure if you're familiar but they pulled their eyes back making them thin for a photoshoot for the beijing olympics) and I've heard some seriously concerning stories about african soccer players playing in spain and other parts of europe.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio
- 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM
2971 Views
I don't think it's racist at all
- 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM
932 Views
Uh.
- 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM
1021 Views
Re: Uh.
- 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM
965 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM
880 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM
993 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
819 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
785 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM*
- 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM
486 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~
- 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
869 Views
Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM
1017 Views
Re: Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM
822 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to.
- 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM
857 Views
She agrees with you about it not being racist - she had issues with your "crude" comment.
- 29/03/2010 08:59:44 PM
836 Views
I don't see it
- 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM
883 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words
- 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM
847 Views
It would not float here in the US
- 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM
866 Views
Agreed.
- 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM
1027 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning?
- 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM
885 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races.
- 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
1126 Views
MOBO
- 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM
825 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think.
- 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM
871 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view.
- 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM
862 Views
Agreed
- 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM
894 Views
Some people are like that, yes, but at least it isn't the "accepted" media position. Yet. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 11:01:47 AM
443 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM
1121 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted.
- 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM
824 Views