Active Users:189 Time:18/05/2024 05:47:02 PM
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
Seriously, what is your deal? Did someone make you the "fixate on one potentially offensive part of a post" admin? I said something that could have been misconstrued, clarified it and I think both Larry and I are on the same page. I certainly don't think I was entirely wrong (Larry conceded that the tensions are at least different, which is a point I can concede as better expressing what I meant) in what I said, but I wasn't wholly right either.

But the basic point of my post WAS right. And that's something that you frustratingly keep ignoring for the sake of your own self-righteousness.

Well fine, go ahead and praise yourself for being so understanding and respectful of other cultures. I on the other hand, prefer to cut the crap and talk about the actual issue.

If you'd like to do so as well, let me know.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 2594 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 639 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 666 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 785 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 723 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 653 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 740 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 589 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 545 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 609 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 376 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 631 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 772 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 561 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 608 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 642 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 633 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 357 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 363 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 340 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 635 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 636 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 798 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 635 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 872 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 586 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 599 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 630 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 726 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 804 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 953 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 624 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 652 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 860 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 596 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 660 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 674 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 720 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 745 Views

Reply to Message