Active Users:631 Time:08/07/2026 09:23:39 PM
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
Seriously, what is your deal? Did someone make you the "fixate on one potentially offensive part of a post" admin? I said something that could have been misconstrued, clarified it and I think both Larry and I are on the same page. I certainly don't think I was entirely wrong (Larry conceded that the tensions are at least different, which is a point I can concede as better expressing what I meant) in what I said, but I wasn't wholly right either.

But the basic point of my post WAS right. And that's something that you frustratingly keep ignoring for the sake of your own self-righteousness.

Well fine, go ahead and praise yourself for being so understanding and respectful of other cultures. I on the other hand, prefer to cut the crap and talk about the actual issue.

If you'd like to do so as well, let me know.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 3052 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 942 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 1000 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 1076 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 1028 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 942 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 1048 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 884 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 840 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 907 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 521 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 931 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 1079 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 882 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 919 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 950 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 943 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 499 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 501 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 488 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 916 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 926 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 1091 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 949 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 1189 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 899 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 894 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 938 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 1025 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 1168 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 1282 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 918 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 951 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 1185 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 876 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 956 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 983 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 1005 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 1047 Views

Reply to Message