Active Users:384 Time:16/06/2025 10:49:00 PM
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

I don't know your situation but from my experience many of the people who complain about tend to be people who eat a lot of convenient food. I can make a very healthy meal in my kitchen for what a meal at your average drive through would cost.

Even so it is true that it does cost a little more to eat healthy. Potatoes are cheaper then tomatoes but I think it is money well spent and if I had to make a choice there would be multiple things I would cut out of my life before I cut healthy food out.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1369 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 678 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 740 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 635 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 705 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 729 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 782 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 831 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 678 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 675 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 915 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 767 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 734 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 721 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 741 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 686 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 658 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 679 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 802 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 765 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 790 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 693 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 641 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 656 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 615 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 677 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 775 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 889 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 748 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1127 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 687 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 723 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 678 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 722 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 645 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 637 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 737 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 815 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 363 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 661 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 362 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 745 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 728 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 380 Views

Reply to Message