Active Users:1075 Time:02/09/2026 12:42:46 PM
Both, in certain areas. nossy Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

But multi-grain IS more expensive, and wheat is the same as eating white in most cases. So what if multi-grain is more? Well, think about multiplying that times all 50 of the items you're buying. If the healthy option is a couple bucks more expensive in every case, it adds up.

And convenient foods are crap, so you have to think ahead to be healthy, in most cases. That's not always easy.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1635 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 890 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 976 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 854 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 925 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 955 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 970 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 1051 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 894 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 884 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 1163 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 968 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 951 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 929 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 938 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 915 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 862 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 885 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 1004 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 965 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 998 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 913 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 851 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 882 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 825 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 900 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 996 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 1096 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 992 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1360 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 931 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 927 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 883 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 921 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 858 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 883 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 980 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 1022 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 480 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 875 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 469 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 943 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 936 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 475 Views

Reply to Message