Active Users:1902 Time:02/05/2026 10:17:05 AM
Both, in certain areas. nossy Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

But multi-grain IS more expensive, and wheat is the same as eating white in most cases. So what if multi-grain is more? Well, think about multiplying that times all 50 of the items you're buying. If the healthy option is a couple bucks more expensive in every case, it adds up.

And convenient foods are crap, so you have to think ahead to be healthy, in most cases. That's not always easy.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1545 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 813 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 880 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 773 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 841 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 885 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 903 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 976 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 806 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 818 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 1084 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 905 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 876 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 860 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 872 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 838 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 792 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 816 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 929 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 896 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 931 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 845 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 782 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 817 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 748 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 824 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 921 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 1030 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 921 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1281 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 857 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 855 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 820 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 855 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 783 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 816 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 894 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 950 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 430 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 803 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 419 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 879 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 852 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 437 Views

Reply to Message