Active Users:2891 Time:02/05/2026 11:53:32 AM
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

I don't know your situation but from my experience many of the people who complain about tend to be people who eat a lot of convenient food. I can make a very healthy meal in my kitchen for what a meal at your average drive through would cost.

Even so it is true that it does cost a little more to eat healthy. Potatoes are cheaper then tomatoes but I think it is money well spent and if I had to make a choice there would be multiple things I would cut out of my life before I cut healthy food out.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1546 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 814 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 882 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 775 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 842 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 886 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 904 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 977 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 807 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 819 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 1086 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 907 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 878 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 861 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 874 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 841 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 793 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 818 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 930 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 897 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 932 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 846 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 784 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 818 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 749 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 825 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 923 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 1031 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 922 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1281 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 859 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 856 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 822 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 857 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 784 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 817 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 896 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 952 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 431 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 805 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 419 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 880 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 853 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 437 Views

Reply to Message