Active Users:1859 Time:13/07/2026 11:04:30 AM
Both, in certain areas. nossy Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

But multi-grain IS more expensive, and wheat is the same as eating white in most cases. So what if multi-grain is more? Well, think about multiplying that times all 50 of the items you're buying. If the healthy option is a couple bucks more expensive in every case, it adds up.

And convenient foods are crap, so you have to think ahead to be healthy, in most cases. That's not always easy.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1591 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 855 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 921 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 820 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 877 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 918 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 941 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 1016 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 854 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 860 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 1127 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 940 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 922 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 898 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 904 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 885 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 835 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 842 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 974 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 938 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 972 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 886 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 825 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 852 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 784 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 863 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 968 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 1073 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 964 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1326 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 895 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 901 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 853 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 897 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 828 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 853 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 944 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 993 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 455 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 842 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 441 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 911 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 890 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 458 Views

Reply to Message