Active Users:368 Time:17/06/2025 07:21:48 AM
Both, in certain areas. nossy Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

But multi-grain IS more expensive, and wheat is the same as eating white in most cases. So what if multi-grain is more? Well, think about multiplying that times all 50 of the items you're buying. If the healthy option is a couple bucks more expensive in every case, it adds up.

And convenient foods are crap, so you have to think ahead to be healthy, in most cases. That's not always easy.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1371 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 681 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 741 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 636 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 708 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 731 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 782 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 831 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 680 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 677 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 917 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 769 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 737 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 722 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 741 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 688 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 661 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 680 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 804 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 765 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 792 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 694 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 641 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 658 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 617 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 678 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 775 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 892 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 750 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1127 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 690 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 725 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 678 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 725 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 645 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 638 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 739 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 818 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 363 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 661 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 362 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 746 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 730 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 382 Views

Reply to Message