Active Users:1492 Time:22/10/2025 01:49:26 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... Legolas Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM
Of course, the general idea is true enough and indeed rather problematic.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1445 Views
Scary but hardly surprising random thoughts - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 733 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 801 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? random thoughts - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 690 Views
Both, in certain areas. nossy - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 756 Views
yes. Gena - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 782 Views
Well also... Gena - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 826 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. The_Muted_Grimaud - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 890 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 735 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? Legolas - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 737 Views
No I mean beautiful random thoughts - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 983 Views
Hrm Sareitha Sedai - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 822 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. nossy - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 782 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 776 Views
Sareitha is right about the range nossy - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 797 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 742 Views
You're not 5'8" Tigr - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 714 Views
Yes I am. nossy - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 725 Views
Yes she is. Gena - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 852 Views
To be fair, snoopcester - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 809 Views
ha! Gena - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 841 Views
5'8" here... Lici - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 743 Views
Yes. Spriteling - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 696 Views
Are they British sizes? nossy - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 717 Views
It would make more sense... Zeeb - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 674 Views
I wondered that too Sareitha Sedai - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 734 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? Gena - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 833 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure Zeeb - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 946 Views
Yes though Gena - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 809 Views
No, American. Tor - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1187 Views
Er, that was me. Spriteling - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 751 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? nossy - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 772 Views
Okay, let's be relative. Spriteling - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 731 Views
Erm.... snoopcester - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 773 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. LiterateDog - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 694 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... Legolas - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 705 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... LaSombra - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 789 Views
It's not. Seriana Sedai - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 870 Views
O.O *NM* globug0822 - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 390 Views
interesting and scary... LaSombra - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 717 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* Mat Girl - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 384 Views
I actually Gena - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 794 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs random thoughts - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 778 Views
exactly! *NM* Gena - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 402 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes