Active Users:1575 Time:01/04/2026 10:05:10 PM
Aha. Nate Send a noteboard - 10/06/2010 04:57:14 AM
My point was just that people without internet by definition aren't going to be turned to downloading games because of DRM that requires the internet.


I see now. Then I also agree with that point. The people who are potentially being actually inconvenienced aren't the ones who are pirating games.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Starcraft II won't have crazy DRM. - 28/05/2010 01:59:14 PM 1074 Views
Still a load of shit. - 28/05/2010 06:39:46 PM 725 Views
Don't get so excited, sheesh. - 28/05/2010 11:04:47 PM 724 Views
I'm not excited. - 28/05/2010 11:18:40 PM 659 Views
Go start your own game company? Really? That's the only response? - 08/06/2010 03:49:33 AM 692 Views
Even just a single authentication? - 08/06/2010 05:00:38 AM 657 Views
Agreed. - 08/06/2010 05:56:20 PM 645 Views
Will they? - 08/06/2010 06:50:01 PM 671 Views
Re: Will they? - 09/06/2010 12:06:38 AM 637 Views
If you think DRM will stop pirating...it wont - 09/06/2010 12:21:03 AM 643 Views
I have to agree... the more restrictions and hassles they put on playing purchased games - 09/06/2010 05:37:40 AM 616 Views
Who doesn't have the internet these days? - 09/06/2010 06:08:19 AM 662 Views
The majority of people, actually. - 09/06/2010 06:27:30 AM 676 Views
Re: The majority of people, actually. - 09/06/2010 06:53:30 AM 674 Views
Re: The majority of people, actually. - 09/06/2010 06:41:28 PM 602 Views
That's just a terrible argument. If they have no Internet, they can't illegally download games. - 10/06/2010 02:18:34 AM 674 Views
I think he was saying ... - 10/06/2010 03:10:08 AM 630 Views
I agree entirely with you. - 10/06/2010 04:37:07 AM 629 Views
Aha. - 10/06/2010 04:57:14 AM 678 Views
Good point. Now why is my argument so terrible? - 10/06/2010 04:20:15 PM 654 Views
You act as though I need to fairly represent your post. - 10/06/2010 11:53:47 PM 631 Views
Phase 1 Beta now over - 09/06/2010 07:45:25 PM 873 Views

Reply to Message