depending on how complicated you wanted to make it...
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 18/06/2010 01:30:37 PM
you could perhaps even have it make some sort of will or concentration check to NOT be distracted by the person on its back. You'd probably have to make it a harder check to not be distracted so much by it that it had an AC loss to the surrounding party members, but still remain "distracted" enough to not lose as much AC to the person on its back.
For that matter, it'd probably lose a substantial amount of AC to the person on its back. Provided they can stay on well enough to attack, they're in a very good position to do serious damage.
Hmm come to think of it, I can see why his DM refused to field the action
you could really make it QUITE complicated without trying very hard... Still, creativity like this should never be squashed.
For that matter, it'd probably lose a substantial amount of AC to the person on its back. Provided they can stay on well enough to attack, they're in a very good position to do serious damage.
Hmm come to think of it, I can see why his DM refused to field the action
you could really make it QUITE complicated without trying very hard... Still, creativity like this should never be squashed.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Riding a hostile creature
- 15/06/2010 09:58:07 PM
786 Views
Your DM was being a dick.
- 16/06/2010 02:08:17 AM
723 Views
And if you are playing 4th ed, which kicks 3.5's ass (
), then you'd do something similar.
- 16/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
660 Views
), then you'd do something similar.
- 16/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
660 Views
mm. two things that bother me about 4th edition
- 17/06/2010 05:16:07 AM
655 Views
Yep.
- 18/06/2010 12:28:08 AM
615 Views
I don't much mind 4th edition, wasn't trying to make a big argument
- 18/06/2010 01:09:01 PM
645 Views
Also: I'm confused by what you mean when you say "core" classes.
- 18/06/2010 04:26:59 AM
588 Views
I'm talking about the classes which DnD has always associated with as "Core"
- 18/06/2010 01:27:27 PM
644 Views
Those ARE all in the Player's Handbook 1.
- 18/06/2010 06:16:45 PM
634 Views
Yah, I was just signing on to say that they seem to have fixed that
- 19/06/2010 06:07:43 AM
653 Views
Well... 3rd edition had about a million books. So that's not exactly a new trend
*NM*
- 19/06/2010 03:56:20 PM
261 Views
*NM*
- 19/06/2010 03:56:20 PM
261 Views
Agreed. Ihaven't DM'd since 2nd edition, but :
- 18/06/2010 09:25:41 AM
693 Views
depending on how complicated you wanted to make it...
- 18/06/2010 01:30:37 PM
637 Views
Indeed. The number 1 rule for any DM: never say no. If a player wants to do something, let them try.
- 18/06/2010 06:31:20 PM
660 Views

*NM*