"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior.
Aemon Send a noteboard - 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM
You might enjoy the way that World of Warcraft looks, and that's completely fine; Blizzard has a talented art team, and they know what they're doing. However, WoW was released six years ago, and was designed to run acceptably on low end 2004 systems. WoW had "low end" graphics six years ago, and hasn't improved much since. They're way behind.
Anyway, I'm not trying to say you're wrong, exactly, because if you like the graphics, then they are "good." Ghav is absolutely right, though, when he says that WoW's graphics are antiquated. He's understating things, really.
The level of detail is just not there. It's like comparing one of the first Disney movies to a modern Pixar film. Disney looks nice, sure, but the devil is in the details.
Anyway, I'm not trying to say you're wrong, exactly, because if you like the graphics, then they are "good." Ghav is absolutely right, though, when he says that WoW's graphics are antiquated. He's understating things, really.

So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones?
11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM
- 1024 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue.
11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM
- 884 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad
12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM
- 757 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior.
12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM
- 844 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense
12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM
- 997 Views
Oh I understand.
12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM
- 772 Views

they really aren't bad
12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM
- 740 Views

You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does
12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM
- 809 Views

no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD
12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM
- 834 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right?
12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM
- 824 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using
13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM
- 770 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times.
13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM
- 756 Views

Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times.
13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM
- 783 Views

That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM
- 809 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM
- 761 Views
This is a meaningless conversation.
13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM
- 730 Views
Your post + Dr. Pepper + front row of serious computer security class = dangerous situation.
*NM*
13/09/2010 07:28:34 PM
- 340 Views

below modern standards doesn't mean "bad"
13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM
- 762 Views

You're a fucking idiot.
13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM
- 722 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about
13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM
- 789 Views

Please don't.
14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM
- 759 Views
that's fine
wish you were a cmb admin
*NM*
14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM
- 375 Views


Hm. I'd have to buy a lot more donuts if I worked over there.
*NM*
14/09/2010 04:07:51 AM
- 359 Views

Haha, I'm just happy that what I said made any sense....I honestly don't remember posting that.
*NM*
12/09/2010 06:31:52 PM
- 495 Views

I've noticed that MMO's that have tried to usurp WoW with superior graphics have failed.
12/09/2010 07:33:13 PM
- 785 Views
I agree, I was shocked that my netbook could run wow at acceptable settings
13/09/2010 05:21:44 AM
- 692 Views
Why would I want to?
*NM*
13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM
- 368 Views
