Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right?
Aemon Send a noteboard - 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM
It means that WoW is 6 years newer than Baldur's Gate, and 6 years OLDER than a newly released modern game. Can you see where I'm going with this? 
If WoW has 6 years of improvement over Baldur's Gate, and a modern game has 6 years of improvement over WoW, then WoW is as inferior to a modern game as Baldur's Gate is to WoW.
From a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, whether you measure that in texture detail, polygon count, minimum system requirements, or whatever, WoW is at least an order of magnitude below modern standards.
If WoW has 6 years of improvement over Baldur's Gate, and a modern game has 6 years of improvement over WoW, then WoW is as inferior to a modern game as Baldur's Gate is to WoW. From a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, whether you measure that in texture detail, polygon count, minimum system requirements, or whatever, WoW is at least an order of magnitude below modern standards.
So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones?
- 11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM
1106 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue.
- 11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM
973 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad
- 12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM
853 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior.
- 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM
952 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense
- 12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM
1106 Views
Oh I understand. 
- 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM
876 Views
- 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM
876 Views
they really aren't bad 
- 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM
844 Views
- 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM
844 Views
You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does
- 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM
895 Views
- 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM
895 Views
no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD
- 12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM
937 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right?
- 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM
926 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using
- 13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM
864 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times.
- 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM
854 Views
- 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM
854 Views
Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times.
- 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM
886 Views
- 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM
886 Views
That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
- 13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM
914 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
- 13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM
876 Views
This is a meaningless conversation.
- 13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM
842 Views
Your post + Dr. Pepper + front row of serious computer security class = dangerous situation. 
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 07:28:34 PM
378 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 07:28:34 PM
378 Views
below modern standards doesn't mean "bad"
- 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM
873 Views
- 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM
873 Views
You're a fucking idiot.
- 13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM
818 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about
- 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM
883 Views
- 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM
883 Views
Please don't.
- 14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM
845 Views
that's fine wish you were a cmb admin *NM*
- 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM
415 Views
wish you were a cmb admin *NM*
- 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM
415 Views
Hm. I'd have to buy a lot more donuts if I worked over there. *NM*
- 14/09/2010 04:07:51 AM
396 Views
*NM*
- 14/09/2010 04:07:51 AM
396 Views
Haha, I'm just happy that what I said made any sense....I honestly don't remember posting that. *NM*
- 12/09/2010 06:31:52 PM
540 Views
*NM*
- 12/09/2010 06:31:52 PM
540 Views
I've noticed that MMO's that have tried to usurp WoW with superior graphics have failed.
- 12/09/2010 07:33:13 PM
879 Views
I agree, I was shocked that my netbook could run wow at acceptable settings
- 13/09/2010 05:21:44 AM
786 Views
Why would I want to? 
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM
410 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM
410 Views