Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right?
Aemon Send a noteboard - 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM
It means that WoW is 6 years newer than Baldur's Gate, and 6 years OLDER than a newly released modern game. Can you see where I'm going with this? 
If WoW has 6 years of improvement over Baldur's Gate, and a modern game has 6 years of improvement over WoW, then WoW is as inferior to a modern game as Baldur's Gate is to WoW.
From a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, whether you measure that in texture detail, polygon count, minimum system requirements, or whatever, WoW is at least an order of magnitude below modern standards.
If WoW has 6 years of improvement over Baldur's Gate, and a modern game has 6 years of improvement over WoW, then WoW is as inferior to a modern game as Baldur's Gate is to WoW. From a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, whether you measure that in texture detail, polygon count, minimum system requirements, or whatever, WoW is at least an order of magnitude below modern standards.
So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones?
- 11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM
1195 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue.
- 11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM
1065 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad
- 12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM
956 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior.
- 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM
1069 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense
- 12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM
1206 Views
Oh I understand. 
- 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM
967 Views
- 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM
967 Views
they really aren't bad 
- 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM
932 Views
- 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM
932 Views
You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does
- 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM
995 Views
- 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM
995 Views
no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD
- 12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM
1037 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right?
- 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM
1029 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using
- 13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM
990 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times.
- 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM
953 Views
- 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM
953 Views
Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times.
- 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM
974 Views
- 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM
974 Views
That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
- 13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM
1020 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
- 13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM
986 Views
This is a meaningless conversation.
- 13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM
948 Views
Your post + Dr. Pepper + front row of serious computer security class = dangerous situation. 
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 07:28:34 PM
427 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 07:28:34 PM
427 Views
below modern standards doesn't mean "bad"
- 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM
981 Views
- 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM
981 Views
You're a fucking idiot.
- 13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM
919 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about
- 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM
973 Views
- 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM
973 Views
Please don't.
- 14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM
937 Views
that's fine wish you were a cmb admin *NM*
- 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM
462 Views
wish you were a cmb admin *NM*
- 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM
462 Views
Hm. I'd have to buy a lot more donuts if I worked over there. *NM*
- 14/09/2010 04:07:51 AM
447 Views
*NM*
- 14/09/2010 04:07:51 AM
447 Views
Haha, I'm just happy that what I said made any sense....I honestly don't remember posting that. *NM*
- 12/09/2010 06:31:52 PM
591 Views
*NM*
- 12/09/2010 06:31:52 PM
591 Views
I've noticed that MMO's that have tried to usurp WoW with superior graphics have failed.
- 12/09/2010 07:33:13 PM
998 Views
I agree, I was shocked that my netbook could run wow at acceptable settings
- 13/09/2010 05:21:44 AM
884 Views
Why would I want to? 
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM
459 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM
459 Views