Active Users:775 Time:18/12/2025 03:43:27 AM
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. Werthead Send a noteboard - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM
My gaming group tried 4E and it split the group down the middle. Several players, mostly people who preferred non-D&D games and only played D&D to appease everyone else, really liked 4E and declared they would only play 4E from that point on if we wanted to play D&D (not coincidentally, they were also big WoW fans).

The rest of us didn't like 4E, though we spent about 3 months playing it and trying to make it work. We compromised by playing some other games for a while, but D&D had always been our default game and every time we went back to it things would bog down into edition wars. The other players weren't even willing to try Pathfinder. So in the end the group splintered apart.

Ironically, I don't think 4E is a particularly bad rules-set and take no pleasure from its failure. In fact, it would make an excellent rules-set for a MALAZAN RPG (where even common grunts can take on gods and survive). It just isn't really the same game as D&D, and throws too much out in an attempt to be relevant and modern.
Reply to message
D&D 5th Edition... Hard to believe how many years this has been going. - 09/01/2012 10:47:30 PM 1794 Views
We still play 3.5 - 09/01/2012 11:05:52 PM 1154 Views
Nerd! *NM* - 09/01/2012 11:13:04 PM 644 Views
Yessssssss - 10/01/2012 08:51:04 AM 1197 Views
I use 3.5 rules too... - 13/01/2012 05:50:58 PM 1282 Views
seriously? 4.0 hasn't even been out that long! - 10/01/2012 12:28:09 AM 1094 Views
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM 1057 Views
Hey now! - 10/01/2012 08:50:02 AM 1096 Views
I found this blog entry enlightening: - 10/01/2012 01:41:12 PM 1215 Views
Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 02:21:37 PM 1108 Views
I started playing when 2E came out. - 10/01/2012 03:01:45 PM 1239 Views
Same here. - 11/01/2012 02:20:41 AM 1063 Views
Re: Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 04:34:39 PM 1152 Views
If you want to know more, read this thread. - 11/01/2012 02:42:06 PM 1153 Views
Cool, thanks. *NM* - 11/01/2012 03:40:46 PM 574 Views
I can't wait to see the Edition Wars™ flare up again. - 10/01/2012 02:55:27 PM 1318 Views
True story: - 10/01/2012 04:39:47 PM 1173 Views
I still play 3.5 - 10/01/2012 04:31:27 PM 1155 Views
The last time I played an AD&D CRPG, it had THAC0. - 10/01/2012 07:47:47 PM 1137 Views
Baldur's Gate, woo! - 11/01/2012 03:49:49 PM 1057 Views
That was a Warrior trait, not a human one. - 11/01/2012 07:18:09 PM 1220 Views
That sounds insanely unintuitive. *NM* - 11/01/2012 07:37:37 PM 609 Views
That's 2nd Edition. - 11/01/2012 10:59:34 PM 1014 Views
I repeat what FT said, that was 2nd edition. *NM* - 12/01/2012 04:20:28 AM 552 Views
AD&D represent! *throws up half-orc gang signs* *NM* - 13/01/2012 01:50:06 AM 753 Views
Throwing up a half-eaten rat is not throwing up a gang sign... *NM* - 13/01/2012 05:26:47 AM 615 Views
What about a half-eaten halfling? - 13/01/2012 02:41:06 PM 1162 Views
*facedesk* *NM* - 13/01/2012 03:45:05 PM 527 Views
(-:,` *NM* - 17/01/2012 09:02:26 PM 587 Views
Been re-reading The Sleeping Dragon, have you? - 25/01/2012 05:29:15 PM 1129 Views
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. - 25/01/2012 06:41:46 PM 1187 Views
A joke in Joel Rosenbergs "The Sleeping Dragon." - 25/01/2012 07:13:26 PM 1222 Views
*sign* *NM* - 13/01/2012 02:41:57 PM 598 Views
*hollas* - 25/01/2012 05:30:45 PM 1050 Views
GURPS is still in 4E. - 25/01/2012 05:58:34 PM 1075 Views
What? I've barely had the opportunity to play 4th Edition yet. - 11/01/2012 02:38:50 AM 1047 Views
Dude.. I still remember the 1st edition books.. - 11/01/2012 12:54:27 PM 1227 Views

Reply to Message