Active Users:685 Time:18/12/2025 04:42:09 AM
Re: Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular Macharius Send a noteboard - 10/01/2012 04:34:39 PM
What are the good parts about 1e and 2e play?


From what I understand, there are three parts to the OSR:

1. People spend a lot of money on an edition, and get pissed off when the editions upgrade after only a few years - a trend that has accelerated since TSR was acquired by WotC/Hasbro. (The amount of rage I've seen against TSR from before it was purchased is pretty amusing since that happened 20+ years ago).

2. Older editions had much less rules. This could be good because it makes it easier to learn and play, and doesn't require stopping play to look up rules constantly - but it also meant a lot of house rules, which could be widely divergent from one house to the next. This also produces a nostalgic feeling "for the good old days". Compared with the Pathfinder book, which is like 600 pages.

3. Older editions played with a much different atmosphere. Without skills or feats, and generally with less magical gear. In those games, a PC was an adventurer - not necessarily a hero. I think that's a subtle but profound difference in how people experienced the game.

There's probably more to it, and most of what I'm saying here is my interpretation of anecdotes I've come across in only the last few months so probably needs a pretty hefty grain of salt. ;)
Reply to message
D&D 5th Edition... Hard to believe how many years this has been going. - 09/01/2012 10:47:30 PM 1794 Views
We still play 3.5 - 09/01/2012 11:05:52 PM 1154 Views
Nerd! *NM* - 09/01/2012 11:13:04 PM 644 Views
Yessssssss - 10/01/2012 08:51:04 AM 1197 Views
I use 3.5 rules too... - 13/01/2012 05:50:58 PM 1282 Views
seriously? 4.0 hasn't even been out that long! - 10/01/2012 12:28:09 AM 1094 Views
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM 1057 Views
Hey now! - 10/01/2012 08:50:02 AM 1096 Views
I found this blog entry enlightening: - 10/01/2012 01:41:12 PM 1215 Views
Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 02:21:37 PM 1108 Views
I started playing when 2E came out. - 10/01/2012 03:01:45 PM 1240 Views
Same here. - 11/01/2012 02:20:41 AM 1063 Views
Re: Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 04:34:39 PM 1153 Views
If you want to know more, read this thread. - 11/01/2012 02:42:06 PM 1154 Views
Cool, thanks. *NM* - 11/01/2012 03:40:46 PM 574 Views
I can't wait to see the Edition Wars™ flare up again. - 10/01/2012 02:55:27 PM 1318 Views
True story: - 10/01/2012 04:39:47 PM 1174 Views
I still play 3.5 - 10/01/2012 04:31:27 PM 1155 Views
The last time I played an AD&D CRPG, it had THAC0. - 10/01/2012 07:47:47 PM 1137 Views
Baldur's Gate, woo! - 11/01/2012 03:49:49 PM 1058 Views
That was a Warrior trait, not a human one. - 11/01/2012 07:18:09 PM 1220 Views
That sounds insanely unintuitive. *NM* - 11/01/2012 07:37:37 PM 609 Views
That's 2nd Edition. - 11/01/2012 10:59:34 PM 1015 Views
I repeat what FT said, that was 2nd edition. *NM* - 12/01/2012 04:20:28 AM 552 Views
AD&D represent! *throws up half-orc gang signs* *NM* - 13/01/2012 01:50:06 AM 753 Views
Throwing up a half-eaten rat is not throwing up a gang sign... *NM* - 13/01/2012 05:26:47 AM 615 Views
What about a half-eaten halfling? - 13/01/2012 02:41:06 PM 1164 Views
*facedesk* *NM* - 13/01/2012 03:45:05 PM 527 Views
(-:,` *NM* - 17/01/2012 09:02:26 PM 587 Views
Been re-reading The Sleeping Dragon, have you? - 25/01/2012 05:29:15 PM 1132 Views
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. - 25/01/2012 06:41:46 PM 1187 Views
A joke in Joel Rosenbergs "The Sleeping Dragon." - 25/01/2012 07:13:26 PM 1222 Views
*sign* *NM* - 13/01/2012 02:41:57 PM 599 Views
*hollas* - 25/01/2012 05:30:45 PM 1050 Views
GURPS is still in 4E. - 25/01/2012 05:58:34 PM 1075 Views
What? I've barely had the opportunity to play 4th Edition yet. - 11/01/2012 02:38:50 AM 1049 Views
Dude.. I still remember the 1st edition books.. - 11/01/2012 12:54:27 PM 1227 Views

Reply to Message