Active Users:691 Time:04/08/2025 01:33:14 AM
Well, in-universe, there was already an uncle-niece marriage that produced two kings. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 29/08/2017 10:08:27 PM

View original post
Nephew to aunt is closer but of course people back then didn't understand genetics. Within royalty I don't think it would raise any eyebrows. After King Tut died his uncle married Tut's sister. Since John's claim to the throne is better than hers marriage is really the only solution.


I'm pretty sure no one in Westeros would know who you are talking about.

Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Game of Thrones (Spoilers) - 28/08/2017 04:50:02 PM 1064 Views
That doesn't bother me at all. - 28/08/2017 08:46:08 PM 636 Views
DUDE, that's your aunt..... - 28/08/2017 10:15:46 PM 639 Views
John can still do better On a different note, as much as I enjoyed *spoiler* - 29/08/2017 06:43:49 AM 740 Views
I totally agree about LF. - 29/08/2017 09:04:26 AM 667 Views
That's two finales in a row where they did that - 29/08/2017 10:07:04 PM 640 Views
Won't one of them have to kill the other? - 29/08/2017 11:35:11 AM 680 Views
marrying cousins only became taboo in recent history and even then mostly just in the west - 29/08/2017 04:55:29 PM 628 Views
Well, in-universe, there was already an uncle-niece marriage that produced two kings. - 29/08/2017 10:08:27 PM 625 Views
You know what they say. - 05/09/2017 03:57:34 AM 613 Views

Reply to Message