Active Users:460 Time:07/10/2025 12:09:07 AM
Did you actually look at the graph you posted? Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 05/10/2017 10:01:09 AM

If you're braking your car and slam into a wall, the fact that you were decelerating before you hit the wall doesn't mean that the wall didn't play a role in you stopping.

There's a notable increase in the rate of decline of suicides after the introduction of the gun ban, which you would acknowledge if you put aside your preconceived notions and looked at the actual data.

"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Las Vegas shooter had 12 guns modified with bump-stocks - 04/10/2017 03:15:33 AM 1301 Views
Bump stocks are considered legal because they are not mechanical devices and... - 04/10/2017 06:01:31 AM 580 Views
Yup *NM* - 05/10/2017 02:55:59 AM 270 Views
Hold your fire. - 04/10/2017 06:39:03 AM 732 Views
There's a very significant correlation between eliminating firearms and reducing suicide. - 04/10/2017 07:54:27 AM 745 Views
Wrong - 04/10/2017 08:50:24 AM 549 Views
Did you actually look at the graph you posted? - 05/10/2017 10:01:09 AM 558 Views
We have an audio of the attack and that was little better than a round a second - 04/10/2017 02:21:35 PM 592 Views
good point - 04/10/2017 03:57:37 PM 604 Views
I wouldn't oppose banning bump-stocks but I am not it would have changed the out come here - 04/10/2017 06:11:27 PM 472 Views
me too - 04/10/2017 06:41:55 PM 631 Views
Re: I wouldn't oppose banning bump-stocks but I am not it would have changed the out come here *NM* - 05/10/2017 03:28:06 AM 291 Views
Why edit when you can double post? *NM* - 05/10/2017 03:36:22 AM 292 Views
Easy enough to ban both. *NM* - 05/10/2017 02:59:15 AM 262 Views
and blocking stuff like that is one of the reasons I don't support the NRA - 05/10/2017 06:37:36 PM 595 Views
I found this article interesting. - 04/10/2017 03:22:20 PM 804 Views
It was an interesting article (here comes the "but" - 04/10/2017 03:43:13 PM 556 Views
Don't talk about my butt - 04/10/2017 06:00:58 PM 574 Views
would I do that? - 04/10/2017 06:39:37 PM 532 Views
of course most people should be more worried about being shot by a family memeber - 04/10/2017 06:31:05 PM 489 Views
Many won't fear it unless they've seen it happen. - 04/10/2017 06:38:03 PM 568 Views
Re: Many won't fear it unless they've seen it happen. - 04/10/2017 06:51:09 PM 546 Views
My nephew wasn't Child when he shot himself. - 05/10/2017 03:35:37 AM 495 Views
Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest it's only small children. - 05/10/2017 11:13:22 AM 535 Views
Sorry if I came off as be offended - 05/10/2017 12:14:32 PM 532 Views
This is getting very apologetic. - 05/10/2017 12:21:43 PM 543 Views
Re: Sorry if I came off as be offended *NM* - 09/10/2017 08:38:11 PM 264 Views
This article questions the findings of that. PS - Vox is really biased. - 04/10/2017 06:08:44 PM 717 Views
the problem is the stats on the US ignore facts that don't sell the narrative - 04/10/2017 06:23:48 PM 611 Views
Thanks. - 04/10/2017 06:24:40 PM 507 Views
There's nothing wrong with an AR-15 per se. It's a good hunting rifle. - 04/10/2017 06:02:56 PM 595 Views
no it isn't - 05/10/2017 03:50:09 AM 570 Views
Nothing was done after 20 or so little kids were slaughtered at Sandy Hook. - 04/10/2017 11:14:26 PM 500 Views
It's the same debate from the same place we were then.... - 04/10/2017 11:24:28 PM 499 Views
That was a rhetorical question. *NM* - 04/10/2017 11:32:48 PM 300 Views
"None of the proposed ideas would have stopped the incident." - 05/10/2017 03:01:55 AM 491 Views
Personal rights are more important than incidental murders. - 06/10/2017 11:46:44 PM 583 Views

Reply to Message