It's funny how you use the New York Times' credibility as valid when it suits you.

By no means is Trump exonerated. The report very clearly states Muller's team could not exonerate Trump for Obstruction of Justice, despite having the ability to do so if the evidence was insufficient.

And while you continue to harp about "collusion" which has no legal definition, what Muller said was they didn't find proof that Trump's campaign conspired with the Russians on specific crimes: the hacking of the DNC, etc. What the report shows plenty of evidence for is Trump wanting Russian help, and the Russians wanting to help, and there's solid evidence the Russians did help.

Maybe you think it's ok for a presidential candidate to want help from another country. But just because that is not a legally defined crime doesn't mean the rest of us are going to be Hoodwinked into thinking it isn't damning evidence of Trump's unfitness to serve as President