Active Users:382 Time:16/10/2025 07:10:03 PM
fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 19/04/2019 02:13:36 PM

It's funny how you use the New York Times' credibility as valid when it suits you.

By no means is Trump exonerated. The report very clearly states Muller's team could not exonerate Trump for Obstruction of Justice, despite having the ability to do so if the evidence was insufficient.

And while you continue to harp about "collusion" which has no legal definition, what Muller said was they didn't find proof that Trump's campaign conspired with the Russians on specific crimes: the hacking of the DNC, etc. What the report shows plenty of evidence for is Trump wanting Russian help, and the Russians wanting to help, and there's solid evidence the Russians did help.

Maybe you think it's ok for a presidential candidate to want help from another country. But just because that is not a legally defined crime doesn't mean the rest of us are going to be Hoodwinked into thinking it isn't damning evidence of Trump's unfitness to serve as President

Reply to message
Powerful Op/Ed that summarizes the entire Russia Collusion nonsense..... - 19/04/2019 01:21:10 PM 1002 Views
- 19/04/2019 02:13:36 PM 777 Views
Crazy libs are now down to the following.....since absolutely no collusion - 19/04/2019 04:22:16 PM 619 Views
Dude....you're kind of proving the point. - 19/04/2019 07:30:11 PM 638 Views
- 19/04/2019 04:21:11 PM 646 Views
+1 - crazy is as crazy does! - 19/04/2019 04:24:27 PM 617 Views
Who is this article addressed to? Who is 'you'? - 19/04/2019 06:44:03 PM 680 Views
Re: Who is this article addressed to? Who is 'you'? - 20/04/2019 04:45:17 PM 678 Views
Re: Who is this article addressed to? Who is 'you'? - 23/04/2019 10:15:10 PM 1001 Views
Bottom line - 20/04/2019 12:16:39 AM 732 Views
Re: Bottom line - 23/04/2019 10:19:30 PM 931 Views
Nixon was never impeached, Chuckles... - 24/04/2019 12:09:32 AM 656 Views

Reply to Message