Active Users:397 Time:01/05/2025 04:40:03 AM
So what's your point about activism? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM

View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.

After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?


Where is the hypocrisy? What text of the Constitution does this violate? Basically, the Supreme Court is telling the District Court not to interfere with the decision of the elected officials of the state. The Constitution gives the power to determine things like this to the states, not the federal courts.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 678 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 379 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 177 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 359 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 344 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 404 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 307 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 320 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 317 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 327 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 174 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 329 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 296 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 342 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 163 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 361 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 177 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 333 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 315 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 299 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 333 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 306 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 406 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 340 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 168 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 319 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 319 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 339 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 316 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 324 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 316 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 349 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 293 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 342 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 300 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 327 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 353 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 294 Views

Reply to Message