Active Users:450 Time:16/06/2025 05:00:39 PM
Not just in 2022, though fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM

View original post
In 2022, all news articles are opinion pieces, regardless of the source.

Walter Cronkite was an opinion journalist. He chose what to report on, and what not to report on. And any number of issues and injustices were ignored by him, not even out of malice or indifference, necessarily. Just lack of awareness, which every human suffers from, is enough to make the idea of "objective" news nonsensical.

News is, and always will be, a two way street. Yes, the journalist must use the utmost caution to be factual and at least acknowledge other perspectives, if only to poke holes in them. But the news consumer must also do their due diligence. Believe no one person fully, diversify your sources, and spend the time to get as full a picture as possible

Refusing to spend that time and simply blaming the media is a chickenish way to absolve oneself of responsibility.

Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 760 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 464 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 256 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 435 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 429 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 484 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 388 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 401 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 397 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 405 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 249 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 406 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 378 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 421 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 239 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 444 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 252 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 412 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 397 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 378 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 416 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 386 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 612 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 418 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 243 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 399 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 402 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 421 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 397 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 405 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 398 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 432 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 375 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 425 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 385 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 409 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 530 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 378 Views

Reply to Message