Active Users:902 Time:31/01/2026 05:59:44 PM
I dunno fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM

View original post

By "debate whether," I was implying argument could be made either way.


Not really. You judge a Constitution by how it does in the face of changes to society, technology and economics. And yours has failed. It's not a particularly surprising result, either. It was a good first iteration. Build on it.
As to the rest, it might very well happen. Most younger voters certainly don't revere American history nor its Founding Fathers. Once they are the majority, who knows what will change? Any and all gods willing, it will happen after I'm gone. If I somehow manage to hang around another 20+ years, I can sit and rock on my front porch while waving my cane angrily at these dastardly voters.


To the contrary, the younger voters honor the Founders and the Constitution the most by asking better of it. Cynically giving up and settling for "small government" whatever that means is the thing that's dastardly.
Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 916 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 621 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 338 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 593 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 581 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 670 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 553 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 552 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 574 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 594 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 331 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 575 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 604 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 576 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 313 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 616 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 332 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 570 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 564 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 530 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 570 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 544 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 791 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 570 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 321 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 587 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 544 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 592 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 556 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 560 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 616 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 598 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 537 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 594 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 535 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 566 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 716 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 528 Views

Reply to Message