Active Users:1565 Time:17/12/2025 04:12:19 AM
I believe he acknowledges that fact. damookster Send a noteboard - 26/01/2023 07:10:33 PM

View original post
You have no Constitutional right to drive a car. You have no Constitutional right to a lot of things. But we do have a Second Amendment and it permits the right to bear arms. Limiting guns to people under 21 is not unreasonable and would almost certainly pass muster if a Federal law were enacted to that effect. Limiting access if the person is a convicted felon would probably also pass muster if narrowly construed and containing protections that would permit removing the restriction in some circumstances. You're never going to get guns out of the hands of criminals, though. They get illegal guns now already anyway.

You have to keep the restrictions carefully tailored to avoid too much discretion on the part of the government. Not letting "depressed people" get guns, for example, would be a non-starter.


Yeah I agree. It's 21 in Connecticut. And it's absolutely necessary that any new laws be specific and not open to interpretation.

What impressed me about this editorial was the call for incremental progress, not an outright ban, from a progressive economist. Yes, we will never be able to prevent criminals from obtaining guns illegally. But that doesn't mean reasonable laws won't accomplish anything.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Surprise, a progressive editorial on reducing gun violence that's reasonable! (long) - 25/01/2023 08:09:04 PM 621 Views
Too Long Will Read - 25/01/2023 11:40:02 PM 202 Views
It is long but worth reading. - 26/01/2023 12:29:48 AM 203 Views
I mean... - 26/01/2023 03:22:52 PM 223 Views
Yeah the editorial is not without faults. - 26/01/2023 04:10:04 PM 212 Views
Some of this is reasonable, but remember: you have no Constitutional right to a dog - 26/01/2023 06:49:47 PM 269 Views
I believe he acknowledges that fact. - 26/01/2023 07:10:33 PM 231 Views
But 'criminals' are not a homogeneous group. - 26/01/2023 08:11:42 PM 235 Views
Bullshit. This is incredibly intellectually dishonest. - 27/01/2023 08:53:42 PM 288 Views
You amuse me - 28/01/2023 12:38:13 AM 225 Views
You bewilder me - 28/01/2023 12:34:42 PM 244 Views
a valid point - 28/01/2023 05:15:31 PM 205 Views
How about a mandate? - 30/01/2023 05:54:17 PM 201 Views
Nothing - 31/01/2023 12:58:31 AM 292 Views
Hands off the John Bircher Society - 01/02/2023 02:46:10 AM 189 Views

Reply to Message