Active Users:437 Time:13/05/2025 07:29:57 PM
If intentional grounding wasn't an additional penalty aerocontrols Send a noteboard - 31/01/2023 02:46:33 PM

then the QB could almost always just down the ball and avoid being sacked for a loss or taken down for a safety.


View original post
View original post
but then I remind myself that nobody can beat the Chiefs and the refs.

My understanding of the rules is partial, but I assume the complaints are about the intentional grounding that cost Burrow his last play and the unnecessary roughness that saved Mahomes.

Am I on target ?

So, about intentional grounding, I would think the wasted down is bad enough, why is this considered nefarious ?


The sketchiest call involves the Chiefs getting a do-over because there was a clock issue and a referee was trying (without success) to stop a play from beginning but they went anyway. I was super glad that KC didn't turn that into points, but it had to be disheartening for the Bengals to see the Chiefs given another chance.

Hollywood has the best moral compass, because it has compassion.
Reply to message
I'm a little bit worried that the Eagles can beat the Chiefs - 30/01/2023 10:28:33 PM 270 Views
Good point *NM* - 31/01/2023 12:06:29 AM 63 Views
why is intentional grounding a flag ? - 31/01/2023 12:49:47 PM 144 Views
If intentional grounding wasn't an additional penalty - 31/01/2023 02:46:33 PM 143 Views
Yes, that makes sense - 01/02/2023 07:08:38 AM 147 Views
*NM* - 13/02/2023 02:17:18 PM 63 Views
Nice call *NM* - 13/02/2023 07:40:58 PM 159 Views
It was a pretty awesome game. - 14/02/2023 01:29:35 AM 141 Views
Re: It was a pretty awesome game. - 14/02/2023 03:18:19 AM 139 Views
You are a little Cassandra / Alexander - 13/02/2023 04:39:13 PM 128 Views
Nope - 14/02/2023 01:26:57 AM 130 Views

Reply to Message