In the books, Elayne does occasionally come across as spoiled or arrogant - not in her own PoV chapters obviously, but in those of others. Certainly the show is a bit more blatant about it, but that's inevitable. But they do also quickly show her intelligence, her diplomatic skills and her kindness and loyalty to her friends - so yeah, I'm pretty happy with her characterization so far.
She mentions spending six summers in the Tower, and you make a really good point about the probable condition of her visits.
By the standards of this show at least, it's plausible - and it might also account for her familiar way of interacting with Aes Sedai that you comment on later.
I guess not a bad way to start building up for the eventual appearance of Cadsuane, though not sure why they couldn't have taken an actual book Aes Sedai for the name of the close friend.
It doesn't seem like anyone is paying any kind of attention to the timeline, no...
I hope not - though I wouldn't mind a somewhat less extreme, more believable version of ITB Lanfear's character. Same with other Forsaken, really - arrogant and thinking of themselves as gods, sure, but a touch more common sense wouldn't hurt.
This is a good point I hadn't considered, but definitely too subtle for this writer's room. In fairness, probably too subtle for any TV writer's room, unless it concerns things that are much higher priority for the overarching plot.
Wait till you see what she does in the next episode... it might not be 'inept' so much as 'can't be bothered'.
Yeah, I also got that impression.
It's a TV show - it's inevitable to have things said out loud that were only hinted at or shown indirectly in internal dialogue in the book it was based on. Unless you have an external narrator who can fill those gaps, which works in some cases but wouldn't make any sense in this kind of show.
Yeah, but how you have her say it makes a difference. You can make her say it in a positive manner - "I like this, Egwene, I've never had a friend with whom I can talk this way, before" or "I'm so looking forward to making new friends, I have to be careful with everyone I speak to at court..."
It might not come across in my writing, but I do try to give make allowances for the medium. Sometimes when I note a difference, it's not intended critically, just making a note to keep in mind how they're going to play it out, or what it says about their focus or priority.
Their track record of handling such differences has basically exhausted any good faith, though.
I noticed that too - taking the opportunity to distinguish themselves from GoT. As you point out on many occasions, they are far more open about sexuality than the books, but on the other hand less inclined to have actual nudity (which in fairness was often of a non-sexual nature in the books, but on TV, it is almost inevitably sexual).
Yeah, I agree with the choice here, and for just about any of the scenes like that from the books. But the flip side of that is Moiraines's three baths in the first nine episodes. That's not RJ writing that Moiraine is naked, that's a camera panning over Rosamund Pike's bare limbs. Aesthetically, there's nothing wrong with that, but it's definitely mixed messages wrt sexuality.
That's the problem with bad writing and world-building. You just can't tell. It's like on GoT or Sanderson's books, when they tried to write characters bring good at politics and we got negotiations even worse than Domon & Moiraine (Egwene in the Hall & w the Sea Folk, Cersei & the High Sparrow, Mace & the bankers, Tyrion and his treason tribunal, or the slavers), but other times they didn't pay attention or missed the significance and in the background Ned or Cersei are actually doing a good job (Ned's scene on the Iron Throne, Cersei's small council meetings), even though from the dialogue, the show thinks they are blundering fools.
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*