Active Users:1460 Time:28/04/2026 01:58:44 AM
Re: Seriously? damookster Send a noteboard - 06/12/2024 11:33:59 PM

View original post
View original postAnd to even suggest a lawyer provide concrete proof for information already specified as privileged is patently ridiculous. And insulting.

Assuming that Tom does indeed possess proof that the current president of the USA was personally bribed by foreign companies, you find it 'ridiculous' and 'insulting' to suggest that he should provide such proof to competent law enforcement because maybe some things are bigger than his attorney-client privilege? Is this because of your 'all politicians are corrupt so we should just let them get away with everything' theories again?



You really need to improve your reading comprehension. Let me break this down for you.

  1. I never said all politicians are so corrupt we should let them get away with everything. My point was and always has been that all politicians are corrupt so it’s naive and foolish to expect otherwise. Or claim any party is morally superior.

  2. My point about Tom is that it is ridiculous and insulting for you to state it’s impossible for you to believe him without his violating attorney client privilege and providing concrete proof. Like I replied to aerocontols, if we were debating aerospace technology and he replied, I know the answer but can’t supply it without violating security, I have no reason to doubt him. We all know that is his field and he has worked on projects that were classified. So, why should I doubt him?

Likewise with Tom. In over 20 years of interactions with him, it has become obvious he is a skilled lawyer who speaks fluent Russian and has traveled there frequently for his work. Comments he has made many times have led me to suspect he and his firm represented some involved and perhaps still do.So again, why would I doubt him? If he says he has specific knowledge that he can’t reveal because it’s privileged, I believe it. And think it’s insulting to him to imply he’s bullshitting.

And lastly, if Tom had a client who told him he bribed Joe Biden in a privileged conversation, my understanding is he is not allowed to call the FBI and report it.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
No Fucks Left to Give Joe tosses Hunter a blanket pardon - 02/12/2024 09:23:33 PM 575 Views
I think if he hadn't said he wouldn't pardon his son, then this would be a non-issue. - 03/12/2024 12:53:15 PM 369 Views
I don't agree with that - it would've been a serious issue still. - 03/12/2024 05:56:18 PM 306 Views
How about this? - 04/12/2024 03:43:52 AM 287 Views
Fully agree. *NM* - 04/12/2024 06:40:15 AM 128 Views
I don't believe he'd been sentenced for those crimes, yet, had he? - 04/12/2024 07:14:04 AM 302 Views
Per 'old news', his sentencing dates were Dec 12 for the gun charge and 16 for tax evasion - 04/12/2024 01:30:11 PM 298 Views
In that case, yes, your solution is a good one. - 04/12/2024 03:58:32 PM 314 Views
Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though. - 04/12/2024 07:18:56 AM 303 Views
Re: Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though. - 04/12/2024 02:07:41 PM 295 Views
Ugh, I hate this 'they're all the same' rhetoric. - 04/12/2024 09:22:38 PM 341 Views
I respectfully disagree. - 04/12/2024 11:09:07 PM 257 Views
Seems like we're kind of talking past each other here. - 05/12/2024 11:39:02 PM 306 Views
Trump had quite a few successes in his first term - 06/12/2024 02:45:32 PM 376 Views
You mean his administration and Congress had those successes. - 06/12/2024 10:12:25 PM 307 Views
No, I mean him. *NM* - 07/12/2024 12:38:27 AM 213 Views
Okay, then I guess we're not debating it, as you like. *NM* - 07/12/2024 08:54:03 AM 185 Views
The achievements of the administration are attributed to the President. - 08/12/2024 10:50:43 AM 353 Views
Some people also think the earth is flat. - 08/12/2024 06:29:37 PM 318 Views
Le sigh - 08/12/2024 09:03:01 PM 352 Views
Make up your mind already. - 08/12/2024 10:30:11 PM 319 Views
I mostly agree, with one giant caveat - 05/12/2024 02:56:02 PM 361 Views
Re: I mostly agree, with one giant caveat - 05/12/2024 03:49:00 PM 269 Views
I take a bit of umbrage at that assignment personally - 06/12/2024 12:37:40 AM 359 Views
We've been over this - some of this is true, some is, at a minimum, not proven that I ever saw. - 05/12/2024 11:18:24 PM 278 Views
I know it was factually true - 06/12/2024 12:46:44 AM 384 Views
Sounds like you need to become a whistleblower and go talk to the FBI yourself, then? - 06/12/2024 11:37:00 AM 276 Views
Typically, whistle blower and attorney client privilege are not viewed as compatible. - 06/12/2024 03:57:12 PM 261 Views
I have a clearance - 06/12/2024 05:01:07 PM 324 Views
Re: I have a clearance - 06/12/2024 08:08:50 PM 300 Views
Secret evidence doesn't have to be believed - 07/12/2024 09:31:10 PM 300 Views
Re: Secret evidence doesn't have to be believed - 08/12/2024 03:46:54 PM 294 Views
Seriously? - 06/12/2024 10:28:07 PM 360 Views
Re: Seriously? - 06/12/2024 11:33:59 PM 378 Views
Did you even read that earlier post? - 07/12/2024 08:53:15 AM 352 Views
I can't believe I'm siding with Tom here - 07/12/2024 01:50:15 AM 290 Views
I guess you kinda have to with your profession. - 07/12/2024 07:46:01 PM 313 Views
Re: I guess you kinda have to with your profession. - 07/12/2024 08:07:28 PM 295 Views
See my other reply above then. *NM* - 07/12/2024 09:43:37 PM 189 Views
You're CLEARLY a Harris plant - 06/12/2024 01:07:07 AM 310 Views
Hah, you got me! - 06/12/2024 11:49:19 AM 281 Views
I'd be hesitant to link Biden with the Democrats anymore - 06/12/2024 01:24:44 AM 320 Views
Re: I'd be hesitant to link Biden with the Democrats anymore - 06/12/2024 01:47:08 AM 371 Views

Reply to Message