I did not vote for fist as soon as I saw an alternative. I voted for fist because of Black's analysis. You'll note that I was not the only one in this analysis, as Yuna and yourself followed suit.
Later on, the Fox issue started to take off, but by then Black was so much pushing for the fist Lynch without any real evidence, I -together with Kronin, Talic and Yuna- switched to Black. I still think that's a pretty anti-town thing to do: push to a Lynch of a person without any evidence. Unless (and I have seen no evidence of this, he has not helped in the hypocopping at all, yet) Black's a cop (deputy, whatever) and KNOWS fist to be guilty. Which, from your analysis is very unlikely.

So, I was forced to choose between a person who's pushing for a Lynch based on no evidence, and another person who seemed to grasp the mechanics of the game a bit better than I did (but I could follow the reasoning and the conclusion) and was just throwing ideas out there. Fox's idea about the Advocate and Chair was basically an answer to somebody suggesting that we should not have an Advocate, because it could only really benefit the DF. Fox said (and he was right) that if a DF would hold the Advocate, he would be VERY well scrutinized and if he was wrong (or was himself found out the be a DF) all his actions would be questioned, scrutinized and this will help the town. If you believe the idea behind hypocopping (which, btw, I will do when I finish this post), you will follow this argument. He never pushed for a DF to be made Advocate (whoever made that thing up?), he only mentioned that the action of a DF Advocate could be used for the Town.
On Thursday the 22nd (early morning RAFO time) I went online for the last time. I had no reason to change my vote and left it at that. Whatever happened afterwards was out of my hands.

And yes: I was wrong about Fox, and apparently also about Black. Sorry. Now everybody, including you, apologize for lynching Blaine, which I did NOT support.
You want to prosecute me for being active? Why not prosecute Amys for being inactive. Or Yuna for NK'ing pro-town players, not once, but TWICE and she still has that ability apparently. Let's trust her to make the right decision on the following Nights.



Yes, but voted for Blaine again later. In fact, he was the Lynch vote as far as I can gather. Refuses to hypocop.



But also the first one to vote for Blaine. But that's Day 1 for you.



Could be an SK in herself, seeing as she has a permanent NK ability and has already NK'ed two pro-town. I would not clear her at this moment of being anti-town. A DF she is probably not, but there might be other things in there.

--------------

Other than these points: good summary. Now if you could only stand corrected and change these few errors.