Active Users:900 Time:05/05/2026 01:55:26 AM
Some first thoughts Isaac Send a noteboard - 01/06/2010 10:27:38 PM
In case anyone was wondering why I haven't posted yet to either game, I was gone for the holiday, I did NB both mods to let them know but it seemed rather pointless to post RBIRL into a post game or reg thread for a relative short and expected absence. Back in a different way too, as much fun as modding can be, the two month hiatus from play is thankfully over.

Okie-dokie, glutted full of barbecue foods and a bit exhausted, so may take a day or so rest up and catch up, hope everyone else enjoyed their holiday, or their weekend if not from a celebrant locale.

First thoughts, from my RM and skimming the initial posts, as expected we are in a crossover game. With 16 players that means good odds are we have at least 3-5 and as many as 16 settings involved. We may have many scenarios so let me kick out a few that pop to mind:

  • We've one setting for each mafia or other, and townies all come from those.

  • We've one setting for all those third party members, 'all' possibly being one person, but say it was the Gotham Asylum crowd and we had The Joker, Two Face, and the Penguin making up the 'Jester' faction.

  • Everybody's from completely different settings, e.g. Darth Vader but no Luke or Han, Rand but no Ishamael.

  • We have 2-5, probably 2-3 characters from any given setting, which may or may not include a hero and baddy each.

    Obviously lots of others, we don't know much yet, but if I had to guess, then assuming the 'Jester' remark wasn't a nod and wink at that role or a homicidal clown - e.g. The Joker or the thing from Stephen King's "It", then I'd guess two equally sized factions of 2-3 anti-town.

    Let's talk a bit about the Jester Role. First, for those not familiar this role, think of it as an Anti-Survivor Role. They aim to get lynched, winning if lynched (Not NK'd, specifically lynched) and the game usually continues after they die, you don't really bother thinking of those still in as fighting for second place, because no one gives a flying snot about the amazing strategy employed by the jester in getting themselves lynched, the jester is just an additional winner, who loses if they get NK'd or survive until the end of the game. So it saves time to ignore them as a concern entirely. If there is one, then there is one, personally I doubt there is and I've no problem lynching someone even if I think they're the Jester, it's no loss in my book, except it nominally wastes a lynch.

    Personally, I'm going to bet on two full factions, probably NK-capable with a role or two to power them up. Though one notes ranagrande didn't actually say there was a third faction, he just indicated a name for them, so let's not dig in our heels on that concept, it was a short name following a very long one, and could be a false flag, even the appearance of multiple NKs tonight won't definitely prove we're Tank-f, but for now that's the horse I'd put my bet on, with the plurality of 'Jesters' implying multiple.

    Okay, name wise the full "Ninja Pirate Zombie Robot Monkey Clowns" is a bit much and even NPZRMC is a bit much, so let's go with NPZ, or "Nipz" and Jesters.

    The odds are our Tank factions are the Nipz and Jesters and each side has 2 or 3 members, possibly 2 and 3, but IMO not likely 2-2, 4-4, or 4-2 so more likely 3-3. They may have identical makeup, which is likely to be chocolate with their group NK and likely a RBer.

    The bad news is this likely means we have 2 NKs a night coming our way, the good news is these are likely to take a toll on the rival Tank faction and not just the Town, and similiar with lynches. If it is 3-3 then we're 6/16 scummer, 37.5%, and a lynch or NK has roughly 20% chance each of whacking someone we want dead, higher if either faction has an edge hunting their rivals since they will want to exterminate them first, I know from multiple personal experience that when on the dark side nothing is more disturbing than the thought of a random SK or rival faction trying to off you come twilight and that the chance of using them to kill off townies is not really worth it for the risk involved. So come the first night, if a townie dies, 6/15 or 20% of the players will be scum and 2 NKs will be landing each with a 3 in 12 chance of hitting someone we want dead too, rising as townies die off from lynches and NKs. Ironically the town gets a positive edge as it dies off since prob-town are less likely to be NK'd while Tank factions try to eliminate each other as a greater threat, so good odds are we'll be taking this down to 5 or fewer players for victory, which means more days which means our regular night roles are stronger.

    Well, that's about all we know right now to speculate around, I'm guessing no deliberate red herrings, or very few. Let's try to gather some info, it won't help us much now but may later, but first some reminders:

    1. You lie, you die - Success is its own excuse, we won't auto-lynch someone who has clearly lied to the town's benefit, but I fully plan to vote for anyone who does without a A+ excuse and will likely vote for them even then.

    2. Don't RC, even truthfully, early unless you've been pressed, we don't need four or five people claiming vanilla to protect their necks from NK and lynch at the heightened odds of losing our cops, docs, etc. So with that in mind, please don't volunteer extra info to these questions unless you think it will aid the cause, and that's the 'Town wins' cause, not the 'I, personally, don't get lynched or NK'd' cause.

    Questions - Please Respond Yes, No, Uncertain (UNC), Won't Answer Currently (WUC)

    a) Are you from a setting that primarily revolves around Modern Earth, such that very little setting background is needed for an audience?

    Examples:
    I am from Twilight - Yes
    I am from James Patterson's Alex Cross Detective Series - Yes
    I am from DC Comics Batman/Superman - Yes

    I am from Star Wars - No
    I am from Wheel of Time - No
    I am from Lord of the Rings - No

    I am from Bram Stroker's Dracula - Uncertain (UNC)
    I am from a cyberpunk series - UNC
    I am from Dr. Who, but am a modern earth sidekick - UNC

    b) Are you a relatively major character from a relatively well-known series?

    Examples:
    Superman - Yes
    Batman - Yes
    Gandalf - Yes
    Darth Vader - Yes
    Captain Kirk - Yes

    Aquaman - UNC
    Dr. Strange - UNC
    Captain Janeway - UNC
    The Borg from Star Trek - UNC

    Breeze or Ham from Mistborn - No
    Sate Pestage or Admiral Thrawn from Star Wars Extended Universe - No
    Doomsday from Superman - No
    Sammael from Wheel of Time - No

    In other words, just saying the name without context is likely get recognition from most random people, then yes, saying the name with context "Robert Smith from the Cure" is likely to get a response from many people or a definite and immediate yes from anyone with an above average familiarity with the series, and saying the name with context is likely to get a blank stare form most people and maybe even a delay from fans of said series without context, e.g. me just saying Breeze or Ham outside of mentioning Mistborn is unlikely to even gain note from solid fans of the series, but in context most readers will remember immediately or need only a little prodding like "Sammael, the Forsaken from Wheel of Time" Don't worry about the relative popularity of the series, unless it's huge like Star Wars or Harry Potter.

    Okay, again, truthful answers only please, my own are UNC and UNC for both so don't be too leery of using those, this second question isn't much of a lie detector question, people could be entirely truthful and give three different answer for say, Admiral Ackbar, but if you're Han Solo you should be answering No to a) and Yes to b)
  • The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
    - Albert Einstein

    King of Cairhien 20-7-2
    Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
    Reply to message
    RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise - 30/05/2010 10:43:08 PM 4943 Views
    Miscellaneous information - 30/05/2010 10:44:49 PM 1796 Views
    Epic Intro *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:26:49 AM 1111 Views
    Thanks *NM* - 31/05/2010 04:00:59 AM 1044 Views
    Re: Miscellaneous information - 31/05/2010 04:38:35 AM 1774 Views
    What. - 31/05/2010 02:30:11 AM 1811 Views
    Re: What. - 31/05/2010 03:01:21 AM 1904 Views
    Or maybe he just wants us to think that ... - 31/05/2010 04:08:54 AM 1785 Views
    RAFO *NM* - 31/05/2010 04:01:26 AM 1052 Views
    Re: RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise - 31/05/2010 03:08:30 AM 1826 Views
    I'm afraid I'm already waaay in over my head - 31/05/2010 07:20:54 AM 1688 Views
    You don't need to get all the references to play though - 31/05/2010 07:31:32 AM 1670 Views
    Don't forget the 5th element *NM* - 31/05/2010 08:25:13 AM 1193 Views
    and the adam's family *NM* - 31/05/2010 03:26:23 PM 1093 Views
    African Rabies is World War Z. Also- DEATH UNICORN!!!! - 31/05/2010 06:06:47 PM 1838 Views
    Okay, so, let's get this started. - 31/05/2010 07:48:13 AM 1825 Views
    yes and yes *NM* - 31/05/2010 12:24:19 PM 1098 Views
    Yes and Yes. Do you? *NM* - 31/05/2010 01:03:04 PM 1093 Views
    Yes I do. *NM* - 31/05/2010 07:42:15 PM 1094 Views
    Indeedy. *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:48:49 PM 1046 Views
    Yessir *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:59:06 PM 1057 Views
    Yup *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:07:41 PM 972 Views
    Well that depends. - 31/05/2010 06:53:02 PM 1645 Views
    Wow, of all the people here to be unfamiliar with a character. - 31/05/2010 07:43:54 PM 1732 Views
    Yeah, that's weird - 31/05/2010 08:02:09 PM 1649 Views
    I went with Wikipedia, actually . - 31/05/2010 08:11:31 PM 1901 Views
    I do...(for both) - 31/05/2010 07:09:06 PM 1906 Views
    I would be willing to bet that's true. - 31/05/2010 08:50:05 PM 1776 Views
    So are you saying the Tourists are also all... tourists? - 31/05/2010 08:54:31 PM 1707 Views
    EBWOP - 31/05/2010 08:57:51 PM 1721 Views
    I think the "Zombie" comes from the African Rabies reference - 31/05/2010 09:42:31 PM 1742 Views
    That's a good point. - 31/05/2010 10:09:29 PM 1719 Views
    Maybe whoever dies becomes a zombie - 02/06/2010 01:57:59 AM 1743 Views
    What's in a name? - 01/06/2010 03:09:24 AM 1699 Views
    Clever - 01/06/2010 03:37:55 AM 1581 Views
    No idea. *NM* - 31/05/2010 10:28:53 PM 1046 Views
    Does that mean you're just not sure of who you are - 01/06/2010 12:51:17 AM 1591 Views
    *looks shamefully down* - 01/06/2010 07:22:16 AM 1804 Views
    Yeargh! *NM* - 31/05/2010 11:59:28 PM 1042 Views
    Yes to both. *NM* - 01/06/2010 12:54:55 AM 1080 Views
    Wait, scratch that. I don't have a place of origin. *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:06:49 AM 956 Views
    I didn't think he meant place but rather the work that you're from *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:20:59 AM 1010 Views
    Oh. Then yeah. *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:48:21 AM 1194 Views
    Yeah...i got both. *NM* - 01/06/2010 02:57:56 AM 1063 Views
    yeps. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:35:56 AM 1000 Views
    Oh, and I nearly forgot ... - 31/05/2010 02:50:14 PM 1754 Views
    WOOOOOOOO *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:07:54 PM 1087 Views
    If there is an Oompa Loompa song whenever someone dies, I will die happy *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:09:38 PM 1011 Views
    +1 - 31/05/2010 08:35:28 PM 1748 Views
    +1 to that song. *NM* - 31/05/2010 08:46:39 PM 1043 Views
    thank you, i'm here all week *NM* - 31/05/2010 09:48:53 PM 1032 Views
    Re: thank you, i'm here all week *NM* - 31/05/2010 09:49:52 PM 1043 Views
    people would die of hilarity. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:03:07 AM 1088 Views
    Since I tried to start a conversation, but failed (because I posted in the wrong place?) - 01/06/2010 07:25:29 AM 1601 Views
    ummm, dear? - 01/06/2010 10:49:54 AM 1681 Views
    Actually, there is. *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:27:46 AM 1066 Views
    fudgemuffins *NM* - 01/06/2010 04:02:28 PM 962 Views
    Are the election rules the same? And the 96 hour deadline? - 02/06/2010 01:08:06 AM 1587 Views
    It's announced in the Miscellaneous information - 01/06/2010 03:17:06 PM 1638 Views
    ^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^ - 01/06/2010 11:07:44 PM 1585 Views
    Re: ^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^ - 02/06/2010 01:12:59 AM 1734 Views
    At least I got the discussion going. *NM* - 02/06/2010 05:58:58 PM 1012 Views
    You know what? - 02/06/2010 06:11:16 PM 1748 Views
    Two can play at that game! - 03/06/2010 01:58:09 AM 1591 Views
    Some first thoughts - 01/06/2010 10:27:38 PM 1633 Views
    Current Info (Table) - 01/06/2010 10:40:41 PM 1858 Views
    Re: Current Info (Table) - 01/06/2010 10:42:17 PM 1689 Views
    UNC UNC *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:35:11 PM 1059 Views
    Yes & UNC - 02/06/2010 02:14:48 AM 1801 Views
    No and yes. - 02/06/2010 02:23:49 AM 1651 Views
    OMGUS Vote: Napoleon62 *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:40:52 AM 1048 Views
    Random stone throwing super dick vote - 02/06/2010 08:00:57 PM 1683 Views
    ranagrande has been lynched - 02/06/2010 09:30:53 PM 1660 Views
    ROFL - 02/06/2010 09:47:48 PM 1774 Views
    Hahaha - 03/06/2010 02:08:29 AM 1704 Views
    UNC and NO - 02/06/2010 06:05:25 PM 1708 Views
    Re: UNC and NO - 02/06/2010 06:17:14 PM 1665 Views
    UNC and NO *NM* - 03/06/2010 01:56:35 AM 1012 Views
    a) Kinda - Yes/UNC. B) UNC. - 01/06/2010 10:54:32 PM 1742 Views
    Re: Some first thoughts - 01/06/2010 11:03:00 PM 1753 Views
    UNC/UNC *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:42:21 PM 1102 Views
    Yes and unable to judge - UNC *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:22:33 AM 1016 Views
    Just do your best on answers, the questions are deliberately vague - 02/06/2010 12:43:25 AM 1555 Views
    So... many... acronyms... - 02/06/2010 01:51:46 AM 1626 Views
    Nipz makes me think of Cheese Nips. - 03/06/2010 01:55:20 AM 1696 Views
    Yes and yes. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:55:07 AM 1041 Views
    Yes/Yes *NM* - 02/06/2010 03:46:49 PM 1038 Views
    UNC and UNC *NM* - 03/06/2010 04:36:55 PM 950 Views
    OK, so we all know who we are. Now what? - 02/06/2010 05:12:38 PM 1685 Views
    We seem to have two random votes already - 02/06/2010 06:06:29 PM 1529 Views
    You mean Napoleon and Isaac? - 03/06/2010 03:07:14 AM 1705 Views
    Still, it's a start - 03/06/2010 06:40:16 PM 1646 Views
    What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 12:36:23 AM 1625 Views
    Re: What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 01:01:52 AM 1698 Views
    I won't be participating in that. - 03/06/2010 01:06:26 AM 1544 Views
    That's pretty legit. - 03/06/2010 02:05:50 AM 1682 Views
    We could talk about Napoleon62 and Isaac voting each other for no reason *NM* - 03/06/2010 02:43:03 AM 1013 Views
    You think there are ulterior motives? - 03/06/2010 03:07:28 AM 1618 Views
    *confused* Aren't there always? *NM* - 03/06/2010 03:09:49 AM 1053 Views
    Not really in this case - 03/06/2010 04:46:02 AM 1593 Views
    It was a joke - 03/06/2010 03:11:00 AM 1641 Views
    Re: It was a joke - 03/06/2010 03:14:48 AM 1566 Views
    Fair enough. Good reason not to. - 03/06/2010 03:45:35 AM 1645 Views
    I actually think it's a decent idea, just needs a modification - 03/06/2010 04:33:47 AM 1640 Views
    I remember that. - 03/06/2010 06:10:33 AM 1566 Views
    Okay, so next 'question' - 03/06/2010 07:57:08 AM 1726 Views
    Ranagrande really seemed to make an effort to go out of his way here. - 03/06/2010 01:31:03 PM 1599 Views
    But if you're from something really weird - 03/06/2010 05:54:37 PM 1690 Views
    You don't even need to pick a bunch of weird things - 03/06/2010 08:23:19 PM 1769 Views
    Is one of those two sets of 5 your answer to your 5 worlds question? - 06/06/2010 10:03:52 PM 1763 Views
    No, they were examples - 07/06/2010 12:14:03 AM 1512 Views
    Yeah, I'm still not doing it. - 03/06/2010 06:59:26 PM 1740 Views
    yeesh! - 03/06/2010 09:36:33 AM 1634 Views
    Re: yeesh! - 03/06/2010 10:41:58 AM 1634 Views
    Alright, I'll do it you fraidy catz - 03/06/2010 09:23:58 PM 1701 Views
    Re: What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 04:28:44 AM 1652 Views
    IMPORTANT POINT - 04/06/2010 05:04:18 AM 1643 Views
    That's a good point - 04/06/2010 05:28:39 AM 1640 Views
    Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:30:05 AM 1753 Views
    Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:37:25 AM 1688 Views
    Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:49:00 AM 1668 Views
    It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 07:37:30 AM 1628 Views
    Re: It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 08:41:16 AM 1704 Views
    Oh, BTW Isaac: you didn't update for my answer in your Table - 04/06/2010 09:01:00 AM 1648 Views
    Wow, that's a weird one - 04/06/2010 09:44:23 AM 1553 Views
    Re: It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 03:41:43 PM 1720 Views
    I was assuming she meant it the same way we warn hypocoppers - 04/06/2010 03:51:06 PM 1567 Views
    jargon question. - 04/06/2010 06:19:51 PM 1639 Views
    Re: jargon question. - 04/06/2010 06:37:34 PM 1600 Views
    okies thanks *NM* - 05/06/2010 03:56:31 AM 994 Views
    Sorry I screwed up your fancy plans. - 04/06/2010 08:05:18 PM 1679 Views
    I must be really tired. - 05/06/2010 02:52:32 AM 1586 Views
    Honestly, anyone trying to lynch based solely on series - 05/06/2010 04:00:13 AM 1550 Views
    or to kill? - 05/06/2010 04:05:53 AM 1636 Views
    Re: or to kill? - 05/06/2010 08:18:25 AM 1627 Views
    EBWOP: programmed, not programmer *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:21:00 AM 1033 Views
    Ohhhh ok, so you assumed he was roled, not that he wa a Doc - 05/06/2010 07:37:36 PM 1713 Views
    Out of curiosity, what did he say? - 05/06/2010 06:47:43 AM 1738 Views
    He said he was programmed. - 05/06/2010 08:22:45 AM 1642 Views
    But... wasn't that the robot game, where we were all programmed? - 05/06/2010 07:37:03 PM 1748 Views
    Actually, my own RM didn't mention robots at all, so odds are neither did DK's - 05/06/2010 09:00:52 PM 1734 Views
    Yup, it was the same. *NM* - 05/06/2010 10:11:22 PM 985 Views
    Can we agree on revealing gender? *NM* - 04/06/2010 06:20:29 PM 1018 Views
    Will that really help us tell who is mafia and who is not? - 04/06/2010 06:39:07 PM 1760 Views
    It'll get us info. - 04/06/2010 08:27:20 PM 1719 Views
    Will listing off five random worlds? - 05/06/2010 04:09:55 AM 1549 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 05/06/2010 08:25:38 AM 1712 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 06/06/2010 10:11:18 PM 1594 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 07/06/2010 10:31:21 AM 1718 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 07/06/2010 12:23:35 PM 1557 Views
    I think we should do this. - 05/06/2010 01:21:18 AM 1632 Views
    im definalty a man *NM* - 06/06/2010 09:07:47 PM 961 Views
    btw, what happened to the Chair election? - 04/06/2010 10:46:41 PM 1603 Views
    Artsapat has been elected Chair. - 05/06/2010 12:39:05 AM 1628 Views
    OK, since I'm apparently Chair (including a Table) *updated Jun 9th* - 06/06/2010 07:43:10 PM 1700 Views
    BlackAdder - M *NM* - 06/06/2010 10:00:38 PM 1009 Views
    Isaac - M (a note on gender) - 06/06/2010 11:01:55 PM 1596 Views
    I'm a dude. *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:04:11 AM 1042 Views
    Male *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:42:34 AM 994 Views
    I am female - 07/06/2010 03:11:45 AM 1624 Views
    Male. *NM* - 07/06/2010 04:52:39 AM 976 Views
    I must have been REALLY tired not having seen this yesterday - 07/06/2010 08:00:23 AM 1599 Views
    Male. . . .again. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:37:52 AM 996 Views
    Napoleon's going to have a hard time - 07/06/2010 09:10:21 AM 1651 Views
    Let's not. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:06:58 PM 986 Views
    I'll call you Smurfette anyway. You know, just because I can. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:29:35 PM 951 Views
    Don't worry, Bro. We can have girl talk together *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:44:32 PM 1075 Views
    Male *NM* - 07/06/2010 10:26:37 AM 1032 Views
    Female. *NM* - 07/06/2010 01:21:11 PM 938 Views
    I'm all MAN!!!!! - 07/06/2010 02:04:55 PM 1668 Views
    I am a manly man! *NM* - 07/06/2010 11:57:48 PM 946 Views
    Male *NM* - 08/06/2010 03:22:47 AM 1037 Views
    Male *NM* - 09/06/2010 12:19:46 AM 963 Views
    Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 12:47:35 AM 1560 Views
    Uh - 07/06/2010 02:13:40 AM 1682 Views
    Re: Uh - 07/06/2010 03:20:53 AM 1724 Views
    Yeah, I don't get it either. - 07/06/2010 04:56:42 AM 1571 Views
    Can someone explain for the slow kids? - 08/06/2010 06:59:47 AM 1567 Views
    Short answer: click the little links at the right side of the page - 08/06/2010 10:56:37 PM 1734 Views
    Basically - 08/06/2010 11:16:26 PM 1739 Views
    Hmm... - 07/06/2010 10:49:12 AM 1641 Views
    Mine - 07/06/2010 01:54:06 PM 1705 Views
    Soooo yeah..... - 07/06/2010 02:03:19 PM 1682 Views
    Hm. Alright. - 07/06/2010 07:15:16 PM 1670 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 08:56:30 PM 1639 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 11:42:27 PM 1625 Views
    Anyone else get the feeling we have some "nontraditional" settings? - 08/06/2010 12:04:23 AM 1649 Views
    Didn't I suggest that from the beginning? *NM* - 08/06/2010 03:08:36 AM 970 Views
    I must say that it makes me uncomfortable - 08/06/2010 07:40:00 AM 1620 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 08/06/2010 03:42:52 AM 1671 Views
    The responses of me - 09/06/2010 02:03:08 AM 1707 Views
    Mine. - 09/06/2010 08:07:17 PM 1655 Views
    Two new thoughts - 08/06/2010 07:48:24 AM 1668 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:02:01 AM 1767 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 04:31:06 AM 1671 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 05:03:10 AM 1607 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:11:51 PM 1607 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 04:57:02 AM 1672 Views
    In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not) - 09/06/2010 07:34:08 AM 1536 Views
    Whoops, replied to the wrong spot... ignore this one, look below! *NM* - 09/06/2010 07:35:40 AM 984 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:00:28 PM 1750 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 03:26:16 AM 1699 Views
    Oops. - 09/06/2010 12:28:25 AM 1885 Views
    Whoa, how are we dead already? - 09/06/2010 03:28:53 AM 1628 Views
    There are still like 5 people left who haven't claimed settings - 09/06/2010 04:19:38 AM 1616 Views
    In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not) - 09/06/2010 07:35:10 AM 1701 Views
    Not sure about the Talic vote, but - 09/06/2010 10:35:25 AM 1658 Views
    Agree - 09/06/2010 12:24:47 PM 1686 Views
    Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 06:10:34 PM 1714 Views
    Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 06:26:08 PM 1651 Views
    Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 08:53:53 PM 1715 Views
    Eh. Let's just lynch Talic. - 09/06/2010 11:23:16 PM 1655 Views
    Maybe you should explain why you think a 'No Lynch' on Day 1 is always bad - 10/06/2010 02:05:16 AM 1692 Views
    Do we have any reason to believe that the scum are not a single united faction? *NM* - 10/06/2010 02:23:11 AM 1073 Views
    I'd say so, it's indicated in the intro text and it's been normal of late - 10/06/2010 02:35:26 AM 1638 Views
    Incidentally... - 10/06/2010 04:24:23 AM 1583 Views
    Agreed. - 10/06/2010 04:31:26 AM 1589 Views
    But even if that happens - 10/06/2010 07:37:45 AM 1634 Views
    Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason. - 10/06/2010 04:21:10 AM 1661 Views
    Thank you. - 10/06/2010 04:30:23 AM 1664 Views
    Good points. - 10/06/2010 04:45:24 AM 1786 Views
    Re: Good points. - 10/06/2010 04:53:22 AM 1647 Views
    Totally. *NM* - 10/06/2010 04:57:57 AM 1020 Views
    Re: Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason. - 10/06/2010 05:03:15 AM 1682 Views
    We might randomly lynch (or try to lynch) someone who is part of a faction - 10/06/2010 06:37:48 AM 1686 Views
    Yeah, but that isn't a voting record. - 11/06/2010 04:41:29 AM 1741 Views
    I don't believe in completely random lynches. - 10/06/2010 04:35:42 PM 1706 Views
    I feel like random lynches are a really good place for scum to hide. - 10/06/2010 06:19:22 PM 1693 Views
    'Seems' isn't 'Is', a dead townie is a dead townie - 10/06/2010 05:57:19 AM 1618 Views
    Which is pretty much the point. - 10/06/2010 05:39:36 PM 1642 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 10/06/2010 06:31:40 PM 1749 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 01:56:41 AM 1717 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 02:18:56 AM 1634 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 02:35:14 AM 1755 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 12:58:25 AM 1700 Views
    Incidentally, how likely do you think it is that I am a Darkfriend? - 11/06/2010 01:34:55 AM 1749 Views
    Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random - 11/06/2010 02:21:24 AM 1732 Views
    Re: Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random - 11/06/2010 02:40:33 AM 1761 Views
    I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 03:36:12 AM 1722 Views
    Re: I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 03:48:31 AM 1672 Views
    Re: I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 04:08:27 AM 1560 Views
    Well actually technically I am kinda new. *NM* - 12/06/2010 01:22:50 PM 1000 Views
    Whoa, did I put Dark Shadows? - 09/06/2010 06:22:16 PM 1685 Views
    Yeaaah, I don't think so. - 09/06/2010 08:13:41 PM 1590 Views
    Update! Darth Katie's analysis: - 09/06/2010 11:20:36 PM 1692 Views
    So sorry guys - 10/06/2010 06:31:49 AM 1691 Views
    It happens, don't worry about it - 10/06/2010 06:35:25 AM 1754 Views
    No problem - 10/06/2010 04:17:27 PM 1739 Views
    Any chance we can get Gher to replace in? - 10/06/2010 07:30:04 PM 1869 Views
    That would be great if he wanted to - 10/06/2010 08:46:55 PM 1701 Views
    Actually... - 10/06/2010 08:52:19 PM 1680 Views
    An addition to my Talic accusation - 10/06/2010 08:48:14 AM 1698 Views
    Duffman wouldn't be awesome? - 10/06/2010 10:31:30 AM 1661 Views
    It was mostly a "slightly better than random" vote - 10/06/2010 04:42:38 PM 1588 Views
    Well, it did raise a good point for approach though - 11/06/2010 01:05:18 AM 1683 Views
    Oh come on. - 10/06/2010 05:56:54 PM 1720 Views
    I maintain it made sense - 11/06/2010 02:55:39 AM 1617 Views
    Heading rival Darkfriend factions would've been awesome. - 11/06/2010 03:02:35 AM 1583 Views
    Definitely - 11/06/2010 03:20:38 AM 1687 Views
    Re: Oh come on. - 12/06/2010 01:56:41 PM 1577 Views
    oh why so serious beet? - 10/06/2010 09:11:03 PM 1635 Views
    ...just watch? - 10/06/2010 11:15:20 PM 1805 Views
    Combined Info (Table) - 11/06/2010 04:33:01 AM 1754 Views
    The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin - 11/06/2010 05:16:27 AM 1635 Views
    Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth. - 11/06/2010 06:37:04 AM 1660 Views
    Re: Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth. - 11/06/2010 12:50:16 PM 1693 Views
    Works for me. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:19:45 PM 980 Views
    Re: The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin - 12/06/2010 03:33:37 PM 1772 Views
    You have an acronym fetish, don't you? *NM* - 11/06/2010 09:02:07 AM 1060 Views
    You know, just because someone is good or bad in their series, - 11/06/2010 05:35:04 AM 1706 Views
    Yep, but the individual character will control that I think - 11/06/2010 05:42:28 AM 1705 Views
    RBIRL for the weekend *NM* - 11/06/2010 12:51:17 PM 958 Views
    Me too basically. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:24:38 PM 983 Views
    [realy busy in real life] - 12/06/2010 12:41:46 PM 1630 Views
    RBIRL for another effing week. - 13/06/2010 01:55:52 AM 1662 Views
    I'm RBIRL this week as well, through Friday. *NM* - 13/06/2010 06:40:04 AM 1021 Views
    I am forced to assume - 13/06/2010 02:46:47 PM 1664 Views
    Oh, and I am semi-RBIRL until Friday too. *NM* - 13/06/2010 03:00:47 PM 1012 Views
    Re: I am forced to assume - 15/06/2010 06:44:06 AM 1715 Views
    Well good luck with that too, I guess. - 15/06/2010 10:29:19 PM 1587 Views
    I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone! - 13/06/2010 04:06:04 AM 1576 Views
    Re: I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone! - 13/06/2010 02:16:40 PM 1603 Views
    Why Isaac? *NM* - 13/06/2010 02:47:49 PM 1020 Views
    I too, unsurprisingly, would like an answer to that *NM* - 13/06/2010 05:48:29 PM 974 Views
    Good point. - 13/06/2010 06:20:55 PM 1635 Views
    Eh, do we ever get that much out of Day One? - 13/06/2010 06:46:31 PM 1817 Views
    Kinda. - 13/06/2010 09:16:56 PM 1692 Views
    Actually it's often the most productive day - 13/06/2010 09:26:25 PM 1663 Views
    Before I basically disappear from this thread for about a week... - 13/06/2010 08:55:03 PM 1732 Views
    Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 04:29:20 PM 1932 Views
    Re: Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 06:50:19 PM 1643 Views
    Re: Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 10:27:43 PM 1643 Views
    EBWOP - 15/06/2010 12:59:20 AM 1946 Views
    Yes it's just day 1 - 15/06/2010 01:06:56 AM 1658 Views
    Pledge: No; CON: Sure - 15/06/2010 12:31:57 AM 1714 Views
    So... - 15/06/2010 01:04:11 AM 1682 Views
    If you will allow me to be pedantic. - 15/06/2010 01:24:07 AM 1547 Views
    Duly noted - 15/06/2010 01:38:34 AM 1606 Views
    Not like they were especially contributive anyway. - 15/06/2010 02:26:34 AM 1570 Views
    Re: So... - 15/06/2010 02:29:41 AM 1668 Views
    Re: So... - 15/06/2010 07:52:29 AM 1597 Views
    Re: So... - 16/06/2010 06:36:22 PM 1745 Views
    I think scum might be willing to ask some questions. - 15/06/2010 01:43:57 AM 1615 Views
    Yes, they do - 15/06/2010 02:32:57 AM 1615 Views
    The pledge I am not very enthused about. - 15/06/2010 01:42:27 AM 1681 Views
    Ok, I just want to say I'm sorry for not posting as much as I normally do - 15/06/2010 02:52:31 AM 1484 Views
    Okay, now you're just pushing for a No-Lynch in different terms. - 15/06/2010 04:49:26 AM 1667 Views
    Also... - 15/06/2010 03:12:18 PM 1719 Views
    Well, the role itself is something you would not expect. - 15/06/2010 03:36:33 PM 1787 Views
    That's an ambiguous but tantalizing statement... - 15/06/2010 03:59:29 PM 1792 Views
    my role and char are consistant - 15/06/2010 10:04:51 AM 1665 Views
    Re: my role and char are consistant - 15/06/2010 03:23:10 PM 1735 Views
    Do you have a suggestion? *NM* - 15/06/2010 06:10:25 PM 979 Views
    On that note... - 16/06/2010 07:02:12 PM 1742 Views
    Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched - 15/06/2010 12:40:27 PM 1624 Views
    Re: Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched - 15/06/2010 04:21:56 PM 1707 Views
    Every vanilla is supposed to say yes. - 15/06/2010 06:13:08 PM 1695 Views
    Which of course brings about the real problem, which is the opposite of what you say. - 15/06/2010 06:26:42 PM 1651 Views
    Let me hold off on answering this, if you don't mind - 15/06/2010 07:14:25 PM 1641 Views
    Fine, I'm not in a hurry. *NM* - 15/06/2010 07:17:10 PM 1094 Views
    Let me run another possible question by you - 15/06/2010 08:18:33 PM 1651 Views
    By the way, this is sort of a revision of white flame's question - 15/06/2010 08:21:32 PM 1502 Views
    At first glance, I don't see any problem with it. - 15/06/2010 09:31:44 PM 1694 Views
    Let's go with it then - 15/06/2010 09:42:32 PM 1719 Views
    Sure. - 15/06/2010 11:28:10 PM 1607 Views
    Re: Sure. - 15/06/2010 11:45:37 PM 1574 Views
    Ok so I really don't like the idea of the pledge - 15/06/2010 04:27:09 PM 1648 Views
    DFs might try to skate through. - 15/06/2010 10:57:06 PM 1758 Views
    Actually Gender was mine... *NM* - 16/06/2010 06:31:02 PM 943 Views
    Also, yes to con, no to pledge. *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:03:42 PM 1018 Views
    The Big Info Compilation v 1.0 (Table) - 14/06/2010 07:40:38 PM 1831 Views
    to get the game moving - 15/06/2010 08:53:38 PM 1734 Views
    go on... *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:38:13 PM 1042 Views
    its day one, do i realy need a reason? *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:56:59 PM 1030 Views
    It is customary *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:01:25 PM 1035 Views
    well... - 15/06/2010 11:04:29 PM 1616 Views
    Eh, I think I've been pretty consistent - 16/06/2010 06:35:57 AM 1593 Views
    Yeah, I was a bit wary of the way he leapt on Talic too. - 16/06/2010 12:51:30 PM 1707 Views
    I actually would think it proves his innocence over anything - 17/06/2010 12:18:04 AM 1760 Views
    Next Question - 15/06/2010 09:56:10 PM 1619 Views
    Seriously - 15/06/2010 10:58:24 PM 1691 Views
    I am willing to answer if others are willing though *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:58:44 PM 1003 Views
    It's interesting, actually. - 16/06/2010 06:37:41 AM 1730 Views
    Debatable. - 15/06/2010 11:00:39 PM 1689 Views
    Strong Yes - 16/06/2010 06:38:53 AM 1681 Views
    Didn't you already say you were a manly man? - 16/06/2010 12:52:57 PM 1677 Views
    Well, he could also be a 'neither' or 'both'. *NM* - 16/06/2010 05:24:26 PM 1044 Views
    I am large; I contain multitudes - 16/06/2010 07:48:33 PM 1760 Views
    HGD- No *NM* - 16/06/2010 12:11:28 PM 941 Views
    I find the HDG question vague and polarizing... *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:04:59 PM 1028 Views
    HDG- yes - 17/06/2010 11:23:18 PM 1690 Views
    Who isn't answering questions (Table) - 17/06/2010 03:13:58 PM 1598 Views
    oi! - 17/06/2010 07:43:23 PM 1683 Views
    Gotcha, fixed it - 17/06/2010 07:50:53 PM 1558 Views
    Throw in an oi for me, too - 17/06/2010 11:22:48 PM 1674 Views
    One of my answers - 18/06/2010 12:50:15 PM 1602 Views
    It won't be too much longer - 18/06/2010 05:25:36 PM 1564 Views
    Agreed - 18/06/2010 06:39:35 PM 1631 Views
    "It" being my own notes etc, off course *NM* - 18/06/2010 06:42:42 PM 1008 Views
    Re: Agreed - 18/06/2010 08:02:02 PM 1846 Views
    Fox is RBIRL until after this weekend - 18/06/2010 10:06:26 PM 1877 Views
    HDG: Plead the 5th - 19/06/2010 09:49:08 AM 1734 Views
    No longer RBIRL and will be what I mostly skimmed over in a bit - 19/06/2010 10:00:12 AM 1575 Views
    Technical difficulties... back to RBIRL until fixed *NM* - 20/06/2010 12:28:41 AM 989 Views
    All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 19/06/2010 08:36:14 PM 1618 Views
    why just FOS? - 19/06/2010 09:48:25 PM 1586 Views
    EBWOP Vote Artsapat - 19/06/2010 09:51:01 PM 1633 Views
    I can't vote for two people at once - 19/06/2010 10:12:10 PM 1566 Views
    Honestly, I'm in standby at this point. - 20/06/2010 09:31:42 AM 1658 Views
    Just for you Beet, a non-acronym version - 20/06/2010 05:13:07 PM 1650 Views
    Hah, nice, thanks - 20/06/2010 05:24:15 PM 1654 Views
    Welcome *NM* - 20/06/2010 05:24:57 PM 985 Views
    Interesting. - 20/06/2010 01:41:40 AM 1788 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 03:43:46 AM 1724 Views
    Okay, admittedly, I haven't been paying that much attention. - 20/06/2010 05:55:51 AM 1639 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 01:29:43 PM 1711 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 05:47:45 PM 1609 Views
    I'll reply to this in bits, but first: - 20/06/2010 06:09:26 PM 1685 Views
    Re: I'll reply to this in bits, but first: - 20/06/2010 06:44:33 PM 1607 Views
    I just wanted a one word thingy, so people could type it easy - 20/06/2010 08:15:57 PM 1793 Views
    No Comment *NM* - 22/06/2010 11:34:42 PM 986 Views
    Let me extend you an offer - 20/06/2010 08:24:11 PM 1729 Views
    A typo-less message implies I'm distracted? How? - 21/06/2010 04:41:17 AM 1728 Views
    No, you said you were distracted, I said the message looks like you want people to think so - 21/06/2010 04:52:36 AM 1713 Views
    I thought I did address the accusation. - 21/06/2010 05:06:41 AM 1622 Views
    See, and I know you're gonna think that was an intentional typo to prove a point. It wasn't, honest - 21/06/2010 05:09:05 AM 1775 Views
    I'm not really interested in typos one way or another - 21/06/2010 05:16:19 AM 1708 Views
    I'm a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world. - 21/06/2010 05:27:27 AM 1702 Views
    And now I'm gonna sleep. I'll get to your questions in the morning. - 21/06/2010 05:29:08 AM 1636 Views
    Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS? - 21/06/2010 05:35:31 AM 1613 Views
    Re: Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS? - 21/06/2010 02:59:05 PM 1684 Views
    MRE seems to be giving a lot of people trouble *NM* - 21/06/2010 05:40:57 PM 1014 Views
    Maybe ask the question again and try to get confirmation? *NM* - 21/06/2010 06:47:51 PM 972 Views
    I think UNC is consistent for MRE for Barbie - 21/06/2010 06:51:13 PM 1675 Views
    For the record, I did eventually change my consistency to a yes. - 21/06/2010 07:17:09 PM 1655 Views
    Possible, and MCS? - 21/06/2010 07:21:29 PM 1664 Views
    Yeah, that's also sketchy. - 21/06/2010 07:28:24 PM 1596 Views
    Re: Yeah, that's also sketchy. - 21/06/2010 08:03:27 PM 1641 Views
    Kronin's Barbie, but claimed he wasn't a major character? Vote: Kronin - 21/06/2010 11:39:34 PM 1686 Views
    I'd like a roleclaim. - 22/06/2010 12:48:13 AM 1661 Views
    Honestly, looking back, consistency should've been a yes. - 22/06/2010 01:21:16 AM 1693 Views
    Oh, and don't forget about Arty. - 22/06/2010 01:21:49 AM 1701 Views
    Each day you can be a different role? That's kind of awesome *NM* - 22/06/2010 07:22:35 AM 1010 Views
    Well, I knew it would come down to this, as soon as you pointed a finger to me. - 21/06/2010 08:02:42 AM 1613 Views
    Might as well explain my answers then. - 21/06/2010 08:52:46 AM 1749 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 06:37:50 PM 1664 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 21/06/2010 07:57:59 AM 1757 Views
    Wow, so I suppose these questions can be used in a town friendly way - 20/06/2010 02:06:15 PM 1715 Views
    Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 01:25:27 AM 1680 Views
    Now, I'm all in favor of lynching Isaac. - 22/06/2010 01:37:37 AM 1738 Views
    "You lie you die" is sound policy not only Day 1, but every Day. - 22/06/2010 01:40:46 AM 1614 Views
    Vote: Artsapat - 22/06/2010 05:01:31 AM 1548 Views
    Hey, that's a good idea. Vote: Artsapat *NM* - 22/06/2010 05:18:21 AM 977 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 01:43:07 AM 1627 Views
    I suppose I'll join in - 22/06/2010 01:45:48 AM 1670 Views
    I'm not gonna deny that I deserve this. - 22/06/2010 03:24:38 AM 1632 Views
    - 22/06/2010 03:52:33 AM 1659 Views
    Oh man, that was hilarious. - 22/06/2010 03:54:58 AM 1596 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 04:15:44 AM 1598 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 04:31:27 AM 1648 Views
    Yea! Kill Kronin! - 22/06/2010 04:56:58 AM 1639 Views
    No offense meant, bro. *NM* - 22/06/2010 05:45:22 PM 972 Views
    My answers to the 2 questions asked... - 20/06/2010 05:31:22 PM 1597 Views
    Just out of curiosity... - 20/06/2010 05:57:00 PM 1590 Views
    Re: Just out of curiosity... - 20/06/2010 06:42:38 PM 1627 Views
    Vote Table - 21/06/2010 08:51:45 PM 1570 Views
    Well, I suppose the sensible thing to do here is lynch Kronin. - 22/06/2010 04:08:46 AM 1575 Views
    I told you, main character was my bad. - 22/06/2010 04:20:08 AM 1564 Views
    OK, I'll hammer this - 22/06/2010 07:29:38 AM 1558 Views
    Kronin al'Sulc has been lynched - 22/06/2010 01:44:22 PM 1708 Views
    a slight delay - 25/06/2010 05:55:03 AM 1653 Views
    Re: a slight delay - 25/06/2010 07:28:21 AM 1628 Views
    No worries, take your time - 25/06/2010 02:02:58 PM 1610 Views

    Reply to Message