You were right to ignore him then, his reasoning was poor, he said it made sense to lynch him then said I must be guilty because I agreed, trust me I would have done the same if I'd been town.

Currently he is using the argument that because I suggested there are occasions a day 1 no lynch might profit the town, I must be black, and somehow my not objecting to never no-lynching when I was a DF is proof that now that I am objecting I might be a DF.

If it were anyone other than me he was saying this about people would be scratching their heads in bewilderment.

Never trust a line of reasoning on things like this if their summary doesn't make sense but the long part does:

1. X says no-lynch on day 1 may be an option
2. X says as a DF he was fine with always lynching, and liked it
3. X objects to a 100% no-use policy on day 1 no-lynching

From this it follows that Isaac is a DF... by the way, where is all the vocal support from me for never no-lynching? I wouldn't be surprised if I'd spoken up in favor of the policy at some point - I do lie when I'm a DF sometimes - but I can't recall strongly arguing for this in the past. I do remember specifically avoiding a thread on it in the previous crossover day 1 thread, kinda weird for a lot of posts on a subject like that without me weighing in, and I was town, it's almost like I didn't really agree but I didn't want to risk losing shy-voters, huh, sort of like I said to FT today. Actually I think I've avoided formally backing it even when I was a DF, but that also wouldn't prove anything, since DFs lie.