We need more info, so I'm preparing a proposal here, and also I have another question which I'll pose in a subsequent thread, I'm picking over the wording.
We will not get a lynch today on present information and circumstances, not a meaningful one anyway, it's hard to lynch people without some proof, trust me, I've a lot of experience lynching people. So we want more info, which means we must encourage people to try to come up with decent questions and to answer them.
To this end, people must have an incentive to try to come up with questions. I suggest a pledge not to lynch anyone who comes up with a question the majority of people answer, so long as this question is reasonably meaningful, e.g. no "Are there people in your setting?" etc. I would also go a bit further and say people should pledge that if they have a NK they will not target this person tonight with it, nor vote to target them if it's a group NK. To avoid overwhelming numbers, we'll put a cap on the first 8 questions and one per customer, so first 8 people to aks a question answered by most people.
I view Hobo (settings) and Artsapat (Gender) as being qualified for this as 1 and 2. Obviously I also qualify with 3 questions and a 4th upcoming, but I'll leave myself as removable, i.e. you can makes this pledge and explicitly say you are not including me, but in the interest to fairness if you say that, I will not consider my own pledge to apply to you and will feel no obligation not to vote for you or NK you, should I have access to the latter. Obviously if you want to gain the protection of this pledge for a question you ask, you should be willing to make it yourself, and be willing to answer questions too.
Note that agreeing not to NK someone on night 1 does not indicate you're a NKer, so you need not muck around with any 'but I'm town so I can't pledge that' stuff, it's just 'if I have one, I won't target these people with it.
So again, that's currently Hobo, Artsapat, and myself with the caveat. These people I now pledge not to vote for on day 1 or NK on night 1, along with anyone else who meets the terms listed above who either asks a new question or who I forgot asked one that got answered. I encourage others to do the same, and before anyone asks, most players will honor that pledge about NKs, there's a difference between lying as a DF and breaking a pledge that didn't significantly impact you're ability to win. Asking the DFs not to NK anyone tonight and everyone to pledge to that would be unfair, they can't not make the pledge without looking guilty and it disadvantages them, so you don't ask for stuff like that, this, speaking as a veteran DF, is a pledge I'd have no problem making and honoring if I were a DF. Also, please no Aes Sedai word games. This is less about pro-town tactics as it is about a pro-game move to get talking and inquiry going again. If you're a DF, spend less time trying to worm you're way out of making the pledge and more time playing the game, like trying to figure out how to ask a question people will be willing to answer and thus protecting yourself from lynch/NK on Day/Night 1.
So that's, the pledge, people who ask useful questions basically get a free pass to live till tomorrow.
Okay, my next question:
Do you believe you character and your role - abilities and alignment - are consistent? Yes or No only
As usual, we should kick the question around real quick for flaws or better wording, but that's basically it. Vanillas should be answering yes to this even if you're the Ur-Example of something (Punisher for vigilante, superman for bulletproof)yet a vanilla, just go with 'Yes', which means if you are a medical dcotor, but just a vanilla, that's still consistent, go with 'yes', just about all major characters of a heroic nature could arguably qualify as investigatory roles, so even in an all-role game it's not likely they'd all be investigators. It's the presence of something contradictory, not the absence of something one might expect, that we're looking for. So no UNC, if you're uncertain, that's a 'No'
Examples of No
I am an evil super villain but town
I am batman, but the vig... Batman is a vigilante, but this game's vig kills people, batman is practically 'Lawful Stupid', he'll throw the Joker back in jail even though he's escaped and killed people like 100 times, same as Superman has never just snapped Luthor's neck, neither would be consistent with the vig role.
My character is notoriously one thing, but I am something else. I am the doc role, even though my character is Sherlock Holmes, Ur-example of the detective.
So I am Jason Vorhees, and bulletproof makes sense, the guy is unkillable, but as a townie, that's not consistent and you say 'No', or as a doc 'No', because he doesn't typically perform life-saving surgery with that machete. If you're a scummer but you are a hero character, that's a 'No', etc.
It's my opinion that everyone will probably be able to say 'Yes' to this, I can, my character's alignment and role ability or lack thereof are consistent. I believe we need to eliminate the option that this is not the case now, so while there is some risk involved for townies who are villains or people with illogical role powers, I think we should take it. I am open to revision if someone has a better phrasing. One potential alternate phrasing would be such that vanillas who are characters you'd just expect to have a role ability could say 'No', this could leave room for a lot people who are vanilla to say 'No' but give cover to roles if we have roles who are contradictory, personally I'm not expecting that so I'd rather all vanillas who aren't villain characters say yes, but it's an alternative I'm reasonably open to.
We will not get a lynch today on present information and circumstances, not a meaningful one anyway, it's hard to lynch people without some proof, trust me, I've a lot of experience lynching people. So we want more info, which means we must encourage people to try to come up with decent questions and to answer them.
To this end, people must have an incentive to try to come up with questions. I suggest a pledge not to lynch anyone who comes up with a question the majority of people answer, so long as this question is reasonably meaningful, e.g. no "Are there people in your setting?" etc. I would also go a bit further and say people should pledge that if they have a NK they will not target this person tonight with it, nor vote to target them if it's a group NK. To avoid overwhelming numbers, we'll put a cap on the first 8 questions and one per customer, so first 8 people to aks a question answered by most people.
I view Hobo (settings) and Artsapat (Gender) as being qualified for this as 1 and 2. Obviously I also qualify with 3 questions and a 4th upcoming, but I'll leave myself as removable, i.e. you can makes this pledge and explicitly say you are not including me, but in the interest to fairness if you say that, I will not consider my own pledge to apply to you and will feel no obligation not to vote for you or NK you, should I have access to the latter. Obviously if you want to gain the protection of this pledge for a question you ask, you should be willing to make it yourself, and be willing to answer questions too.
Note that agreeing not to NK someone on night 1 does not indicate you're a NKer, so you need not muck around with any 'but I'm town so I can't pledge that' stuff, it's just 'if I have one, I won't target these people with it.
So again, that's currently Hobo, Artsapat, and myself with the caveat. These people I now pledge not to vote for on day 1 or NK on night 1, along with anyone else who meets the terms listed above who either asks a new question or who I forgot asked one that got answered. I encourage others to do the same, and before anyone asks, most players will honor that pledge about NKs, there's a difference between lying as a DF and breaking a pledge that didn't significantly impact you're ability to win. Asking the DFs not to NK anyone tonight and everyone to pledge to that would be unfair, they can't not make the pledge without looking guilty and it disadvantages them, so you don't ask for stuff like that, this, speaking as a veteran DF, is a pledge I'd have no problem making and honoring if I were a DF. Also, please no Aes Sedai word games. This is less about pro-town tactics as it is about a pro-game move to get talking and inquiry going again. If you're a DF, spend less time trying to worm you're way out of making the pledge and more time playing the game, like trying to figure out how to ask a question people will be willing to answer and thus protecting yourself from lynch/NK on Day/Night 1.
So that's, the pledge, people who ask useful questions basically get a free pass to live till tomorrow.
Okay, my next question:
Do you believe you character and your role - abilities and alignment - are consistent? Yes or No only
As usual, we should kick the question around real quick for flaws or better wording, but that's basically it. Vanillas should be answering yes to this even if you're the Ur-Example of something (Punisher for vigilante, superman for bulletproof)yet a vanilla, just go with 'Yes', which means if you are a medical dcotor, but just a vanilla, that's still consistent, go with 'yes', just about all major characters of a heroic nature could arguably qualify as investigatory roles, so even in an all-role game it's not likely they'd all be investigators. It's the presence of something contradictory, not the absence of something one might expect, that we're looking for. So no UNC, if you're uncertain, that's a 'No'
Examples of No
I am an evil super villain but town
I am batman, but the vig... Batman is a vigilante, but this game's vig kills people, batman is practically 'Lawful Stupid', he'll throw the Joker back in jail even though he's escaped and killed people like 100 times, same as Superman has never just snapped Luthor's neck, neither would be consistent with the vig role.
My character is notoriously one thing, but I am something else. I am the doc role, even though my character is Sherlock Holmes, Ur-example of the detective.
So I am Jason Vorhees, and bulletproof makes sense, the guy is unkillable, but as a townie, that's not consistent and you say 'No', or as a doc 'No', because he doesn't typically perform life-saving surgery with that machete. If you're a scummer but you are a hero character, that's a 'No', etc.
It's my opinion that everyone will probably be able to say 'Yes' to this, I can, my character's alignment and role ability or lack thereof are consistent. I believe we need to eliminate the option that this is not the case now, so while there is some risk involved for townies who are villains or people with illogical role powers, I think we should take it. I am open to revision if someone has a better phrasing. One potential alternate phrasing would be such that vanillas who are characters you'd just expect to have a role ability could say 'No', this could leave room for a lot people who are vanilla to say 'No' but give cover to roles if we have roles who are contradictory, personally I'm not expecting that so I'd rather all vanillas who aren't villain characters say yes, but it's an alternative I'm reasonably open to.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise
30/05/2010 10:43:08 PM
- 3896 Views
Miscellaneous information
30/05/2010 10:44:49 PM
- 1197 Views
Since I have not seen anybody else do this before (and it's a great way to start a conversation)
31/05/2010 07:33:03 PM
- 1173 Views
EBWOP: Don't know why this was not in the root, where I thought I put it
31/05/2010 07:34:09 PM
- 1154 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise
31/05/2010 03:08:30 AM
- 1252 Views
I'm afraid I'm already waaay in over my head
31/05/2010 07:20:54 AM
- 1179 Views
Don't forget the 5th element *NM*
31/05/2010 08:25:13 AM
- 787 Views
Okay, so, let's get this started.
31/05/2010 07:48:13 AM
- 1266 Views
Well that depends.
31/05/2010 06:53:02 PM
- 1110 Views
Wow, of all the people here to be unfamiliar with a character.
31/05/2010 07:43:54 PM
- 1198 Views
I do...(for both)
31/05/2010 07:09:06 PM
- 1381 Views
I would be willing to bet that's true.
31/05/2010 08:50:05 PM
- 1202 Views
So are you saying the Tourists are also all... tourists?
31/05/2010 08:54:31 PM
- 1142 Views
EBWOP
31/05/2010 08:57:51 PM
- 1168 Views
Yes, and I recently read/watched/listened to whatever it is I'm from, too. Loved it *NM*
31/05/2010 07:29:20 PM
- 706 Views
No idea. *NM*
31/05/2010 10:28:53 PM
- 710 Views
Yes to both. *NM*
01/06/2010 12:54:55 AM
- 763 Views
Wait, scratch that. I don't have a place of origin. *NM*
01/06/2010 03:06:49 AM
- 626 Views
I didn't think he meant place but rather the work that you're from *NM*
01/06/2010 03:20:59 AM
- 693 Views
If there is an Oompa Loompa song whenever someone dies, I will die happy *NM*
31/05/2010 06:09:38 PM
- 680 Views
+1
31/05/2010 08:35:28 PM
- 1222 Views
+1 to that song. *NM*
31/05/2010 08:46:39 PM
- 719 Views
Since I tried to start a conversation, but failed (because I posted in the wrong place?)
01/06/2010 07:25:29 AM
- 1069 Views
ummm, dear?
01/06/2010 10:49:54 AM
- 1092 Views
^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^
01/06/2010 11:07:44 PM
- 1068 Views
Some first thoughts
01/06/2010 10:27:38 PM
- 1067 Views
Current Info (Table)
01/06/2010 10:40:41 PM
- 1324 Views
No and yes.
02/06/2010 02:23:49 AM
- 1158 Views
Random stone throwing super dick vote
02/06/2010 08:00:57 PM
- 1160 Views
Just do your best on answers, the questions are deliberately vague
02/06/2010 12:43:25 AM
- 1035 Views
OK, so we all know who we are. Now what?
02/06/2010 05:12:38 PM
- 1192 Views
We seem to have two random votes already
02/06/2010 06:06:29 PM
- 1042 Views
What do y'all think?
03/06/2010 12:36:23 AM
- 1102 Views
I won't be participating in that.
03/06/2010 01:06:26 AM
- 1023 Views
That's pretty legit.
03/06/2010 02:05:50 AM
- 1174 Views
We could talk about Napoleon62 and Isaac voting each other for no reason *NM*
03/06/2010 02:43:03 AM
- 692 Views
You think there are ulterior motives?
03/06/2010 03:07:28 AM
- 1119 Views
Fair enough. Good reason not to.
03/06/2010 03:45:35 AM
- 1132 Views
I actually think it's a decent idea, just needs a modification
03/06/2010 04:33:47 AM
- 1118 Views
I remember that.
03/06/2010 06:10:33 AM
- 1020 Views
Okay, so next 'question'
03/06/2010 07:57:08 AM
- 1151 Views
Ranagrande really seemed to make an effort to go out of his way here.
03/06/2010 01:31:03 PM
- 1098 Views
But if you're from something really weird
03/06/2010 05:54:37 PM
- 1185 Views
You don't even need to pick a bunch of weird things
03/06/2010 08:23:19 PM
- 1223 Views
Is one of those two sets of 5 your answer to your 5 worlds question?
06/06/2010 10:03:52 PM
- 1209 Views
IMPORTANT POINT
04/06/2010 05:04:18 AM
- 1100 Views
Who, exactly, is this warning intended for?
04/06/2010 05:30:05 AM
- 1181 Views
Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for?
04/06/2010 05:37:25 AM
- 1152 Views
Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for?
04/06/2010 05:49:00 AM
- 1144 Views
It is an interesting theory, though
04/06/2010 07:37:30 AM
- 1084 Views
Re: It is an interesting theory, though
04/06/2010 08:41:16 AM
- 1147 Views
I was assuming she meant it the same way we warn hypocoppers
04/06/2010 03:51:06 PM
- 1071 Views
jargon question.
04/06/2010 06:19:51 PM
- 1117 Views
Sorry I screwed up your fancy plans.
04/06/2010 08:05:18 PM
- 1149 Views
I must be really tired.
05/06/2010 02:52:32 AM
- 1049 Views
Honestly, anyone trying to lynch based solely on series
05/06/2010 04:00:13 AM
- 1025 Views
Out of curiosity, what did he say?
05/06/2010 06:47:43 AM
- 1215 Views
He said he was programmed.
05/06/2010 08:22:45 AM
- 1158 Views
But... wasn't that the robot game, where we were all programmed?
05/06/2010 07:37:03 PM
- 1183 Views
Actually, my own RM didn't mention robots at all, so odds are neither did DK's
05/06/2010 09:00:52 PM
- 1215 Views
Can we agree on revealing gender? *NM*
04/06/2010 06:20:29 PM
- 678 Views
Will that really help us tell who is mafia and who is not?
04/06/2010 06:39:07 PM
- 1137 Views
Will listing off five random worlds?
05/06/2010 04:09:55 AM
- 1028 Views
Re: Will listing off five random worlds?
06/06/2010 10:11:18 PM
- 1067 Views
btw, what happened to the Chair election?
04/06/2010 10:46:41 PM
- 1071 Views
I'm relatively content to give it to anyone who doesn't have day 1 lynch jitters
05/06/2010 12:12:19 AM
- 1654 Views
OK, since I'm apparently Chair (including a Table) *updated Jun 9th*
06/06/2010 07:43:10 PM
- 1172 Views
Male. . . .again. *NM*
07/06/2010 08:37:52 AM
- 683 Views
Napoleon's going to have a hard time
07/06/2010 09:10:21 AM
- 1106 Views
Let's not. *NM*
07/06/2010 08:06:58 PM
- 675 Views
I'll call you Smurfette anyway. You know, just because I can. *NM*
07/06/2010 08:29:35 PM
- 641 Views
Settings (Table)
07/06/2010 12:47:35 AM
- 1097 Views
Uh
07/06/2010 02:13:40 AM
- 1195 Views
Can someone explain for the slow kids?
08/06/2010 06:59:47 AM
- 1076 Views
Short answer: click the little links at the right side of the page
08/06/2010 10:56:37 PM
- 1240 Views
Anyone else get the feeling we have some "nontraditional" settings?
08/06/2010 12:04:23 AM
- 1151 Views
Didn't I suggest that from the beginning? *NM*
08/06/2010 03:08:36 AM
- 670 Views
I must say that it makes me uncomfortable
08/06/2010 07:40:00 AM
- 1099 Views
Just went back: ranagrande told me knowing settings is not vital to playing. A slight relief. *NM*
08/06/2010 07:49:10 AM
- 724 Views
Two new thoughts
08/06/2010 07:48:24 AM
- 1171 Views
Re: Two new thoughts
09/06/2010 12:02:01 AM
- 1184 Views
Re: Two new thoughts
09/06/2010 04:31:06 AM
- 1127 Views
Re: Two new thoughts
09/06/2010 04:57:02 AM
- 1194 Views
In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not)
09/06/2010 07:34:08 AM
- 1004 Views
Whoops, replied to the wrong spot... ignore this one, look below! *NM*
09/06/2010 07:35:40 AM
- 673 Views
In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not)
09/06/2010 07:35:10 AM
- 1150 Views
Not sure about the Talic vote, but
09/06/2010 10:35:25 AM
- 1139 Views
Agree
09/06/2010 12:24:47 PM
- 1139 Views
Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before.
09/06/2010 06:10:34 PM
- 1178 Views
Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before.
09/06/2010 06:26:08 PM
- 1132 Views
Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before.
09/06/2010 08:53:53 PM
- 1162 Views
Maybe you should explain why you think a 'No Lynch' on Day 1 is always bad
10/06/2010 02:05:16 AM
- 1140 Views
Do we have any reason to believe that the scum are not a single united faction? *NM*
10/06/2010 02:23:11 AM
- 759 Views
I'd say so, it's indicated in the intro text and it's been normal of late
10/06/2010 02:35:26 AM
- 1074 Views
Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason.
10/06/2010 04:21:10 AM
- 1092 Views
Good points.
10/06/2010 04:45:24 AM
- 1277 Views
Re: Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason.
10/06/2010 05:03:15 AM
- 1146 Views
We might randomly lynch (or try to lynch) someone who is part of a faction
10/06/2010 06:37:48 AM
- 1122 Views
I don't believe in completely random lynches.
10/06/2010 04:35:42 PM
- 1188 Views
I feel like random lynches are a really good place for scum to hide.
10/06/2010 06:19:22 PM
- 1162 Views
'Seems' isn't 'Is', a dead townie is a dead townie
10/06/2010 05:57:19 AM
- 1110 Views
Which is pretty much the point.
10/06/2010 05:39:36 PM
- 1135 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point.
10/06/2010 06:31:40 PM
- 1197 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point.
11/06/2010 01:56:41 AM
- 1194 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point.
11/06/2010 12:58:25 AM
- 1184 Views
Incidentally, how likely do you think it is that I am a Darkfriend?
11/06/2010 01:34:55 AM
- 1180 Views
Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random
11/06/2010 02:21:24 AM
- 1174 Views
Re: Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random
11/06/2010 02:40:33 AM
- 1226 Views
I suppose we're back to DefCon 5
11/06/2010 03:36:12 AM
- 1196 Views
Hmm... I did forget the "main character" thing. Regardless, Talic is Captain Morgan
09/06/2010 11:25:03 PM
- 1195 Views
So sorry guys
10/06/2010 06:31:49 AM
- 1180 Views
No problem
10/06/2010 04:17:27 PM
- 1222 Views
Any chance we can get Gher to replace in?
10/06/2010 07:30:04 PM
- 1342 Views
An addition to my Talic accusation
10/06/2010 08:48:14 AM
- 1175 Views
Duffman wouldn't be awesome?
10/06/2010 10:31:30 AM
- 1144 Views
Oh come on.
10/06/2010 05:56:54 PM
- 1183 Views
I maintain it made sense
11/06/2010 02:55:39 AM
- 1123 Views
Combined Info (Table)
11/06/2010 04:33:01 AM
- 1215 Views
The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin
11/06/2010 05:16:27 AM
- 1134 Views
Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth.
11/06/2010 06:37:04 AM
- 1135 Views
Re: Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth.
11/06/2010 12:50:16 PM
- 1187 Views
Re: The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin
12/06/2010 03:33:37 PM
- 1210 Views
RBIRL for another effing week.
13/06/2010 01:55:52 AM
- 1165 Views
I am forced to assume
13/06/2010 02:46:47 PM
- 1127 Views
I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone!
13/06/2010 04:06:04 AM
- 1072 Views
Re: I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone!
13/06/2010 02:16:40 PM
- 1123 Views
Good point.
13/06/2010 06:20:55 PM
- 1112 Views
Before I basically disappear from this thread for about a week...
13/06/2010 08:55:03 PM
- 1175 Views
Re: Before I basically disappear from this thread for about a week...
14/06/2010 02:35:18 AM
- 1331 Views
Okay, pushing forward
14/06/2010 04:29:20 PM
- 1380 Views
Pledge: No; CON: Sure
15/06/2010 12:31:57 AM
- 1168 Views
So...
15/06/2010 01:04:11 AM
- 1119 Views
If you will allow me to be pedantic.
15/06/2010 01:24:07 AM
- 1030 Views
Ok, I just want to say I'm sorry for not posting as much as I normally do
15/06/2010 02:52:31 AM
- 998 Views
Okay, now you're just pushing for a No-Lynch in different terms.
15/06/2010 04:49:26 AM
- 1125 Views
<coughs> Not trying to imply you didn't actually read the post here, but...
15/06/2010 07:35:44 AM
- 1014 Views
Also...
15/06/2010 03:12:18 PM
- 1184 Views
BA has a point- townies ALREADY have an incentive to ask questions. Why reward DFs?
15/06/2010 07:56:04 AM
- 1112 Views
Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched
15/06/2010 12:40:27 PM
- 1081 Views
Well, the lengthy posts are for clarity, apparently I wasn't lengthy enough.
15/06/2010 05:05:22 PM
- 1097 Views
Every vanilla is supposed to say yes.
15/06/2010 06:13:08 PM
- 1155 Views
Which of course brings about the real problem, which is the opposite of what you say.
15/06/2010 06:26:42 PM
- 1103 Views
Let me hold off on answering this, if you don't mind
15/06/2010 07:14:25 PM
- 1123 Views
Fine, I'm not in a hurry. *NM*
15/06/2010 07:17:10 PM
- 761 Views
Let me run another possible question by you
15/06/2010 08:18:33 PM
- 1159 Views
By the way, this is sort of a revision of white flame's question
15/06/2010 08:21:32 PM
- 1009 Views
At first glance, I don't see any problem with it.
15/06/2010 09:31:44 PM
- 1150 Views
to get the game moving
15/06/2010 08:53:38 PM
- 1195 Views
go on... *NM*
15/06/2010 09:38:13 PM
- 714 Views
its day one, do i realy need a reason? *NM*
15/06/2010 09:56:59 PM
- 704 Views
It is customary *NM*
15/06/2010 10:01:25 PM
- 706 Views
well...
15/06/2010 11:04:29 PM
- 1096 Views
Next Question
15/06/2010 09:56:10 PM
- 1094 Views
Strong Yes
16/06/2010 06:38:53 AM
- 1165 Views
Didn't you already say you were a manly man?
16/06/2010 12:52:57 PM
- 1162 Views
Who isn't answering questions (Table)
17/06/2010 03:13:58 PM
- 1073 Views
One of my answers
18/06/2010 12:50:15 PM
- 1093 Views
It won't be too much longer
18/06/2010 05:25:36 PM
- 1044 Views
All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse
19/06/2010 08:36:14 PM
- 1088 Views
why just FOS?
19/06/2010 09:48:25 PM
- 1095 Views
I can't vote for two people at once
19/06/2010 10:12:10 PM
- 1048 Views
Honestly, I'm in standby at this point.
20/06/2010 09:31:42 AM
- 1130 Views
Just for you Beet, a non-acronym version
20/06/2010 05:13:07 PM
- 1108 Views
Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse
20/06/2010 01:29:43 PM
- 1189 Views
I'll reply to this in bits, but first:
20/06/2010 06:09:26 PM
- 1150 Views
Re: I'll reply to this in bits, but first:
20/06/2010 06:44:33 PM
- 1082 Views
Let me extend you an offer
20/06/2010 08:24:11 PM
- 1193 Views
A typo-less message implies I'm distracted? How?
21/06/2010 04:41:17 AM
- 1205 Views
No, you said you were distracted, I said the message looks like you want people to think so
21/06/2010 04:52:36 AM
- 1182 Views
I thought I did address the accusation.
21/06/2010 05:06:41 AM
- 1102 Views
See, and I know you're gonna think that was an intentional typo to prove a point. It wasn't, honest
21/06/2010 05:09:05 AM
- 1222 Views
I'm not really interested in typos one way or another
21/06/2010 05:16:19 AM
- 1148 Views
I'm a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world.
21/06/2010 05:27:27 AM
- 1124 Views
And now I'm gonna sleep. I'll get to your questions in the morning.
21/06/2010 05:29:08 AM
- 1081 Views
Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS?
21/06/2010 05:35:31 AM
- 1052 Views
Re: Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS?
21/06/2010 02:59:05 PM
- 1141 Views
I think UNC is consistent for MRE for Barbie
21/06/2010 06:51:13 PM
- 1114 Views
For the record, I did eventually change my consistency to a yes.
21/06/2010 07:17:09 PM
- 1096 Views
Possible, and MCS?
21/06/2010 07:21:29 PM
- 1101 Views
Yeah, that's also sketchy.
21/06/2010 07:28:24 PM
- 1088 Views
Re: Yeah, that's also sketchy.
21/06/2010 08:03:27 PM
- 1107 Views
Kronin's Barbie, but claimed he wasn't a major character? Vote: Kronin
21/06/2010 11:39:34 PM
- 1139 Views
I'd like a roleclaim.
22/06/2010 12:48:13 AM
- 1098 Views
Honestly, looking back, consistency should've been a yes.
22/06/2010 01:21:16 AM
- 1164 Views
Each day you can be a different role? That's kind of awesome *NM*
22/06/2010 07:22:35 AM
- 704 Views
Well, I knew it would come down to this, as soon as you pointed a finger to me.
21/06/2010 08:02:42 AM
- 1096 Views
Wow, so I suppose these questions can be used in a town friendly way
20/06/2010 02:06:15 PM
- 1174 Views
Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll
22/06/2010 01:25:27 AM
- 1119 Views
"You lie you die" is sound policy not only Day 1, but every Day.
22/06/2010 01:40:46 AM
- 1111 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll
22/06/2010 01:43:07 AM
- 1074 Views
I suppose I'll join in
22/06/2010 01:45:48 AM
- 1126 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll
22/06/2010 04:15:44 AM
- 1059 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll
22/06/2010 04:31:27 AM
- 1109 Views
My answers to the 2 questions asked...
20/06/2010 05:31:22 PM
- 1037 Views
Kronin al'Sulc has been lynched
22/06/2010 01:44:22 PM
- 1130 Views