I'd do the same in your shoes. Just as well. I was gorram Barbie.
Reminds me of the game where Isaac and I were Edward Cullen and Bella Swann. Obviously we got murdered from the onset, as though people simply knew we deserved to die
.Incredibly amusing.
Insert theme music here.
RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise
- 30/05/2010 10:43:08 PM
4897 Views
Miscellaneous information
- 30/05/2010 10:44:49 PM
1759 Views
Since I have not seen anybody else do this before (and it's a great way to start a conversation)
- 31/05/2010 07:33:03 PM
1714 Views
EBWOP: Don't know why this was not in the root, where I thought I put it
- 31/05/2010 07:34:09 PM
1683 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise
- 31/05/2010 03:08:30 AM
1785 Views
I'm afraid I'm already waaay in over my head
- 31/05/2010 07:20:54 AM
1658 Views
Don't forget the 5th element *NM*
- 31/05/2010 08:25:13 AM
1174 Views
Okay, so, let's get this started.
- 31/05/2010 07:48:13 AM
1787 Views
Well that depends.
- 31/05/2010 06:53:02 PM
1604 Views
Wow, of all the people here to be unfamiliar with a character.
- 31/05/2010 07:43:54 PM
1698 Views
I do...(for both)
- 31/05/2010 07:09:06 PM
1876 Views
I would be willing to bet that's true.
- 31/05/2010 08:50:05 PM
1734 Views
So are you saying the Tourists are also all... tourists?
- 31/05/2010 08:54:31 PM
1665 Views
EBWOP
- 31/05/2010 08:57:51 PM
1693 Views
Yes, and I recently read/watched/listened to whatever it is I'm from, too. Loved it
*NM*
- 31/05/2010 07:29:20 PM
991 Views
*NM*
- 31/05/2010 07:29:20 PM
991 Views
No idea. *NM*
- 31/05/2010 10:28:53 PM
1026 Views
Yes to both. *NM*
- 01/06/2010 12:54:55 AM
1062 Views
Wait, scratch that. I don't have a place of origin. *NM*
- 01/06/2010 03:06:49 AM
938 Views
I didn't think he meant place but rather the work that you're from *NM*
- 01/06/2010 03:20:59 AM
992 Views
If there is an Oompa Loompa song whenever someone dies, I will die happy *NM*
- 31/05/2010 06:09:38 PM
992 Views
+1
- 31/05/2010 08:35:28 PM
1717 Views
+1 to that song. *NM*
- 31/05/2010 08:46:39 PM
1024 Views
Since I tried to start a conversation, but failed (because I posted in the wrong place?)
- 01/06/2010 07:25:29 AM
1571 Views
ummm, dear?
- 01/06/2010 10:49:54 AM
1645 Views
^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^
- 01/06/2010 11:07:44 PM
1559 Views
Some first thoughts
- 01/06/2010 10:27:38 PM
1591 Views
Current Info (Table)
- 01/06/2010 10:40:41 PM
1821 Views
No and yes.
- 02/06/2010 02:23:49 AM
1621 Views
Random stone throwing super dick vote
- 02/06/2010 08:00:57 PM
1651 Views
Just do your best on answers, the questions are deliberately vague
- 02/06/2010 12:43:25 AM
1527 Views
OK, so we all know who we are. Now what?
- 02/06/2010 05:12:38 PM
1649 Views
We seem to have two random votes already
- 02/06/2010 06:06:29 PM
1493 Views
What do y'all think?
- 03/06/2010 12:36:23 AM
1587 Views
I won't be participating in that.
- 03/06/2010 01:06:26 AM
1507 Views
That's pretty legit.
- 03/06/2010 02:05:50 AM
1651 Views
We could talk about Napoleon62 and Isaac voting each other for no reason *NM*
- 03/06/2010 02:43:03 AM
997 Views
You think there are ulterior motives?
- 03/06/2010 03:07:28 AM
1583 Views
Fair enough. Good reason not to.
- 03/06/2010 03:45:35 AM
1611 Views
I actually think it's a decent idea, just needs a modification
- 03/06/2010 04:33:47 AM
1614 Views
I remember that.
- 03/06/2010 06:10:33 AM
1537 Views
Okay, so next 'question'
- 03/06/2010 07:57:08 AM
1691 Views
Ranagrande really seemed to make an effort to go out of his way here.
- 03/06/2010 01:31:03 PM
1568 Views
But if you're from something really weird
- 03/06/2010 05:54:37 PM
1649 Views
You don't even need to pick a bunch of weird things
- 03/06/2010 08:23:19 PM
1739 Views
Is one of those two sets of 5 your answer to your 5 worlds question?
- 06/06/2010 10:03:52 PM
1725 Views
IMPORTANT POINT
- 04/06/2010 05:04:18 AM
1607 Views
Who, exactly, is this warning intended for?
- 04/06/2010 05:30:05 AM
1720 Views
Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for?
- 04/06/2010 05:37:25 AM
1645 Views
Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for?
- 04/06/2010 05:49:00 AM
1628 Views
It is an interesting theory, though
- 04/06/2010 07:37:30 AM
1594 Views
Re: It is an interesting theory, though
- 04/06/2010 08:41:16 AM
1675 Views
I was assuming she meant it the same way we warn hypocoppers
- 04/06/2010 03:51:06 PM
1537 Views
jargon question.
- 04/06/2010 06:19:51 PM
1610 Views
Sorry I screwed up your fancy plans.
- 04/06/2010 08:05:18 PM
1648 Views
I must be really tired.
- 05/06/2010 02:52:32 AM
1553 Views
Honestly, anyone trying to lynch based solely on series
- 05/06/2010 04:00:13 AM
1516 Views
Out of curiosity, what did he say?
- 05/06/2010 06:47:43 AM
1706 Views
He said he was programmed.
- 05/06/2010 08:22:45 AM
1611 Views
But... wasn't that the robot game, where we were all programmed?
- 05/06/2010 07:37:03 PM
1711 Views
Actually, my own RM didn't mention robots at all, so odds are neither did DK's
- 05/06/2010 09:00:52 PM
1699 Views
Can we agree on revealing gender? *NM*
- 04/06/2010 06:20:29 PM
994 Views
Will that really help us tell who is mafia and who is not?
- 04/06/2010 06:39:07 PM
1731 Views
Will listing off five random worlds?
- 05/06/2010 04:09:55 AM
1522 Views
Re: Will listing off five random worlds?
- 06/06/2010 10:11:18 PM
1563 Views
btw, what happened to the Chair election?
- 04/06/2010 10:46:41 PM
1571 Views
I'm relatively content to give it to anyone who doesn't have day 1 lynch jitters
- 05/06/2010 12:12:19 AM
2149 Views
OK, since I'm apparently Chair (including a Table) *updated Jun 9th*
- 06/06/2010 07:43:10 PM
1664 Views
Male. . . .again.
*NM*
- 07/06/2010 08:37:52 AM
979 Views
*NM*
- 07/06/2010 08:37:52 AM
979 Views
Napoleon's going to have a hard time
- 07/06/2010 09:10:21 AM
1622 Views
Let's not.
*NM*
- 07/06/2010 08:06:58 PM
967 Views
*NM*
- 07/06/2010 08:06:58 PM
967 Views
I'll call you Smurfette anyway. You know, just because I can.
*NM*
- 07/06/2010 08:29:35 PM
931 Views
*NM*
- 07/06/2010 08:29:35 PM
931 Views
Settings (Table)
- 07/06/2010 12:47:35 AM
1520 Views
Uh
- 07/06/2010 02:13:40 AM
1649 Views
Can someone explain for the slow kids?
- 08/06/2010 06:59:47 AM
1540 Views
Short answer: click the little links at the right side of the page
- 08/06/2010 10:56:37 PM
1701 Views
Anyone else get the feeling we have some "nontraditional" settings?
- 08/06/2010 12:04:23 AM
1615 Views
Didn't I suggest that from the beginning? *NM*
- 08/06/2010 03:08:36 AM
948 Views
I must say that it makes me uncomfortable
- 08/06/2010 07:40:00 AM
1585 Views
Just went back: ranagrande told me knowing settings is not vital to playing. A slight relief. *NM*
- 08/06/2010 07:49:10 AM
1011 Views
Two new thoughts
- 08/06/2010 07:48:24 AM
1633 Views
Re: Two new thoughts
- 09/06/2010 12:02:01 AM
1726 Views
Re: Two new thoughts
- 09/06/2010 04:31:06 AM
1634 Views
Re: Two new thoughts
- 09/06/2010 04:57:02 AM
1645 Views
In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not)
- 09/06/2010 07:34:08 AM
1506 Views
Whoops, replied to the wrong spot... ignore this one, look below! *NM*
- 09/06/2010 07:35:40 AM
965 Views
In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not)
- 09/06/2010 07:35:10 AM
1670 Views
Not sure about the Talic vote, but
- 09/06/2010 10:35:25 AM
1620 Views
Agree
- 09/06/2010 12:24:47 PM
1657 Views
Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before.
- 09/06/2010 06:10:34 PM
1679 Views
Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before.
- 09/06/2010 06:26:08 PM
1605 Views
Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before.
- 09/06/2010 08:53:53 PM
1678 Views
Maybe you should explain why you think a 'No Lynch' on Day 1 is always bad
- 10/06/2010 02:05:16 AM
1652 Views
Do we have any reason to believe that the scum are not a single united faction? *NM*
- 10/06/2010 02:23:11 AM
1055 Views
I'd say so, it's indicated in the intro text and it's been normal of late
- 10/06/2010 02:35:26 AM
1603 Views
Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason.
- 10/06/2010 04:21:10 AM
1628 Views
Good points.
- 10/06/2010 04:45:24 AM
1753 Views
Re: Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason.
- 10/06/2010 05:03:15 AM
1651 Views
We might randomly lynch (or try to lynch) someone who is part of a faction
- 10/06/2010 06:37:48 AM
1645 Views
I don't believe in completely random lynches.
- 10/06/2010 04:35:42 PM
1674 Views
I feel like random lynches are a really good place for scum to hide.
- 10/06/2010 06:19:22 PM
1663 Views
'Seems' isn't 'Is', a dead townie is a dead townie
- 10/06/2010 05:57:19 AM
1578 Views
Which is pretty much the point.
- 10/06/2010 05:39:36 PM
1610 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point.
- 10/06/2010 06:31:40 PM
1709 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point.
- 11/06/2010 01:56:41 AM
1675 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point.
- 11/06/2010 12:58:25 AM
1663 Views
Incidentally, how likely do you think it is that I am a Darkfriend?
- 11/06/2010 01:34:55 AM
1720 Views
Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random
- 11/06/2010 02:21:24 AM
1694 Views
Re: Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random
- 11/06/2010 02:40:33 AM
1729 Views
I suppose we're back to DefCon 5
- 11/06/2010 03:36:12 AM
1679 Views
Hmm... I did forget the "main character" thing. Regardless, Talic is Captain Morgan
- 09/06/2010 11:25:03 PM
1704 Views
So sorry guys
- 10/06/2010 06:31:49 AM
1657 Views
No problem
- 10/06/2010 04:17:27 PM
1710 Views
Any chance we can get Gher to replace in?
- 10/06/2010 07:30:04 PM
1829 Views
An addition to my Talic accusation
- 10/06/2010 08:48:14 AM
1662 Views
Duffman wouldn't be awesome?
- 10/06/2010 10:31:30 AM
1634 Views
Oh come on.
- 10/06/2010 05:56:54 PM
1686 Views
I maintain it made sense
- 11/06/2010 02:55:39 AM
1590 Views
Combined Info (Table)
- 11/06/2010 04:33:01 AM
1719 Views
The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin
- 11/06/2010 05:16:27 AM
1599 Views
Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth.
- 11/06/2010 06:37:04 AM
1617 Views
Re: Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth.
- 11/06/2010 12:50:16 PM
1663 Views
Re: The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin
- 12/06/2010 03:33:37 PM
1745 Views
RBIRL for another effing week.
- 13/06/2010 01:55:52 AM
1629 Views
I am forced to assume
- 13/06/2010 02:46:47 PM
1625 Views
I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone!
- 13/06/2010 04:06:04 AM
1542 Views
Re: I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone!
- 13/06/2010 02:16:40 PM
1571 Views
Good point.
- 13/06/2010 06:20:55 PM
1603 Views
Before I basically disappear from this thread for about a week...
- 13/06/2010 08:55:03 PM
1696 Views
Re: Before I basically disappear from this thread for about a week...
- 14/06/2010 02:35:18 AM
1833 Views
Okay, pushing forward
- 14/06/2010 04:29:20 PM
1898 Views
Pledge: No; CON: Sure
- 15/06/2010 12:31:57 AM
1685 Views
So...
- 15/06/2010 01:04:11 AM
1643 Views
If you will allow me to be pedantic.
- 15/06/2010 01:24:07 AM
1515 Views
Ok, I just want to say I'm sorry for not posting as much as I normally do
- 15/06/2010 02:52:31 AM
1446 Views
Okay, now you're just pushing for a No-Lynch in different terms.
- 15/06/2010 04:49:26 AM
1631 Views
<coughs> Not trying to imply you didn't actually read the post here, but...
- 15/06/2010 07:35:44 AM
1563 Views
Also...
- 15/06/2010 03:12:18 PM
1691 Views
BA has a point- townies ALREADY have an incentive to ask questions. Why reward DFs?
- 15/06/2010 07:56:04 AM
1624 Views
Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched
- 15/06/2010 12:40:27 PM
1583 Views
Well, the lengthy posts are for clarity, apparently I wasn't lengthy enough.
- 15/06/2010 05:05:22 PM
1599 Views
Every vanilla is supposed to say yes.
- 15/06/2010 06:13:08 PM
1665 Views
Which of course brings about the real problem, which is the opposite of what you say.
- 15/06/2010 06:26:42 PM
1607 Views
Let me hold off on answering this, if you don't mind
- 15/06/2010 07:14:25 PM
1603 Views
Fine, I'm not in a hurry. *NM*
- 15/06/2010 07:17:10 PM
1080 Views
Let me run another possible question by you
- 15/06/2010 08:18:33 PM
1613 Views
By the way, this is sort of a revision of white flame's question
- 15/06/2010 08:21:32 PM
1472 Views
At first glance, I don't see any problem with it.
- 15/06/2010 09:31:44 PM
1664 Views
to get the game moving
- 15/06/2010 08:53:38 PM
1684 Views
go on... *NM*
- 15/06/2010 09:38:13 PM
1021 Views
its day one, do i realy need a reason? *NM*
- 15/06/2010 09:56:59 PM
1011 Views
It is customary
*NM*
- 15/06/2010 10:01:25 PM
1013 Views
*NM*
- 15/06/2010 10:01:25 PM
1013 Views
well...
- 15/06/2010 11:04:29 PM
1585 Views
Next Question
- 15/06/2010 09:56:10 PM
1587 Views
Strong Yes
- 16/06/2010 06:38:53 AM
1643 Views
Didn't you already say you were a manly man?
- 16/06/2010 12:52:57 PM
1646 Views
Who isn't answering questions (Table)
- 17/06/2010 03:13:58 PM
1568 Views
One of my answers
- 18/06/2010 12:50:15 PM
1568 Views
It won't be too much longer
- 18/06/2010 05:25:36 PM
1525 Views
All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse
- 19/06/2010 08:36:14 PM
1583 Views
why just FOS?
- 19/06/2010 09:48:25 PM
1553 Views
I can't vote for two people at once
- 19/06/2010 10:12:10 PM
1528 Views
Honestly, I'm in standby at this point.
- 20/06/2010 09:31:42 AM
1621 Views
Just for you Beet, a non-acronym version
- 20/06/2010 05:13:07 PM
1608 Views
- 20/06/2010 05:13:07 PM
1608 Views
Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse
- 20/06/2010 01:29:43 PM
1679 Views
I'll reply to this in bits, but first:
- 20/06/2010 06:09:26 PM
1650 Views
Re: I'll reply to this in bits, but first:
- 20/06/2010 06:44:33 PM
1577 Views
Let me extend you an offer
- 20/06/2010 08:24:11 PM
1695 Views
A typo-less message implies I'm distracted? How?
- 21/06/2010 04:41:17 AM
1692 Views
No, you said you were distracted, I said the message looks like you want people to think so
- 21/06/2010 04:52:36 AM
1679 Views
I thought I did address the accusation.
- 21/06/2010 05:06:41 AM
1591 Views
See, and I know you're gonna think that was an intentional typo to prove a point. It wasn't, honest
- 21/06/2010 05:09:05 AM
1744 Views
I'm not really interested in typos one way or another
- 21/06/2010 05:16:19 AM
1680 Views
I'm a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world.
- 21/06/2010 05:27:27 AM
1671 Views
And now I'm gonna sleep. I'll get to your questions in the morning.
- 21/06/2010 05:29:08 AM
1607 Views
Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS?
- 21/06/2010 05:35:31 AM
1577 Views
Re: Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS?
- 21/06/2010 02:59:05 PM
1657 Views
I think UNC is consistent for MRE for Barbie
- 21/06/2010 06:51:13 PM
1641 Views
For the record, I did eventually change my consistency to a yes.
- 21/06/2010 07:17:09 PM
1618 Views
Possible, and MCS?
- 21/06/2010 07:21:29 PM
1625 Views
Yeah, that's also sketchy.
- 21/06/2010 07:28:24 PM
1560 Views
Re: Yeah, that's also sketchy.
- 21/06/2010 08:03:27 PM
1614 Views
Kronin's Barbie, but claimed he wasn't a major character? Vote: Kronin
- 21/06/2010 11:39:34 PM
1652 Views
I'd like a roleclaim.
- 22/06/2010 12:48:13 AM
1625 Views
Honestly, looking back, consistency should've been a yes.
- 22/06/2010 01:21:16 AM
1656 Views
Each day you can be a different role? That's kind of awesome *NM*
- 22/06/2010 07:22:35 AM
994 Views
Well, I knew it would come down to this, as soon as you pointed a finger to me.
- 21/06/2010 08:02:42 AM
1574 Views
Wow, so I suppose these questions can be used in a town friendly way
- 20/06/2010 02:06:15 PM
1685 Views
Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll
- 22/06/2010 01:25:27 AM
1642 Views
"You lie you die" is sound policy not only Day 1, but every Day.
- 22/06/2010 01:40:46 AM
1580 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll
- 22/06/2010 01:43:07 AM
1594 Views
I suppose I'll join in
- 22/06/2010 01:45:48 AM
1633 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll
- 22/06/2010 04:15:44 AM
1563 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll
- 22/06/2010 04:31:27 AM
1616 Views
My answers to the 2 questions asked...
- 20/06/2010 05:31:22 PM
1558 Views
Kronin al'Sulc has been lynched
- 22/06/2010 01:44:22 PM
1672 Views

*NM*
what I mostly skimmed over in a bit