Active Users:537 Time:01/03/2026 01:28:39 PM
He could have just been being polite Hieshyn Send a noteboard - 07/11/2011 06:34:30 PM
I don't think we're likely to be getting any new information today, so I'm going to pick up where I left off yesterday. I mentioned near the end of Day 1 that Kronin was my top suspect. Now that ? has taken over Kronin's character, I suspect him even more.

The increase in suspicion is primarily because Kronin requested a replacement. I don't believe that he would have done that if he had been a vanilla townie, nor would he have made sure that he checked in and posted just enough to ward off modkills. His actions make sense if he viewed himself as an important, even integral part of his team and didn't want to hurt them through inaction. This is supported by the fact that Kronin was indeed replaced, despite Fanatic-Templar's previously stated preference for modkills over replacements.

This lets us know that Kronin had, and ? now has, a significant role. If that was all I knew, I wouldn't be posting this now, because I wouldn't want to take the risk that Kronin/? was actually a townie with a power role, like the cop or doctor. However, I have further reason to believe that he is, in fact, scum.

My first evidence is simply that I think it. That will obviously not persuade many of you, but I have learned to trust my intuition. I did, after all, call out beetnemesis on Day 1 in the last game, and I could probably find similar examples in every game I've been a townie in.

My second evidence is found in Kronin's response to my vote for him. He replied with "Please don't." A simple, plaintive request that we not lynch him. This is the same kind of reaction he had when we began targeting him in Isaac's Mad Muad game. As you will recall, he was a darkfriend in that game.

Admittedly, the case looks a bit flimsy, but I don't doubt that it's the best we're going to get today.

I'm certainly not trying to rush anyone, or blitz through Day 2. If anyone has anything useful to discuss, by all means, let's do. And then, when we're all done, we can lynch ?, because he is almost certainly scum.


Not saying he can't be scum, but its a little better to hand off your character if you can't continue to play to give someone else another chance at the game, rather than just get modkilled and make the game unnecessarily shorter.

Would ? have been given Kronin's decode thingy for his coded roleclaim? We could have him decode it to see if it would match up to his role, maybe it would show if Kronin lied or not, then we could go from there. (I'm assuming of course that if you enter the wrong key it wont make sense upon decoding. If it doesn't work that way let me know.)
The God King mourns...
Reply to message
Game 24, Day 2 - Game has ended - 06/11/2011 06:04:27 PM 1444 Views
I'm actually a bit surprised by the choice of ? - 06/11/2011 07:34:57 PM 1293 Views
Yes, it was an oversight. He was a townie. *NM* - 06/11/2011 08:01:11 PM 549 Views
Voting record: - 07/11/2011 05:25:40 PM 1193 Views
Was he suspicious of anyone yesterday? - 07/11/2011 02:52:26 PM 998 Views
Re: Was he suspicious of anyone yesterday? - 07/11/2011 03:36:31 PM 1167 Views
I think a second look at our poetry is in order too, now we have more of it - 07/11/2011 12:43:21 AM 1135 Views
... and the two things - 07/11/2011 01:29:31 AM 1145 Views
I object to this plan. - 07/11/2011 02:07:35 AM 1041 Views
UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 02:59:27 PM 936 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 06:23:42 PM 1059 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 08:17:53 PM 972 Views
Wait, would everyone be picking their own two letters? Ah, ok, it's not as dangerous as I thought - 07/11/2011 08:20:32 PM 975 Views
Yes *NM* - 07/11/2011 08:41:04 PM 537 Views
and follow that to the logical conclusion... - 07/11/2011 08:40:43 PM 1222 Views
no *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:19:20 PM 561 Views
FT already banned it *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:20:45 PM 540 Views
I know, I'm just voicing my opinion *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:27:34 PM 461 Views
Besides the ban, I can't see why you'd object - 07/11/2011 06:44:14 PM 1014 Views
errrm, i don't think no is a strong enough word for this *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:58:09 PM 659 Views
? will be replacing Kronin... - 07/11/2011 01:56:08 AM 1013 Views
Vote: ? - 07/11/2011 02:33:43 PM 1171 Views
Re: Vote: ? - 07/11/2011 02:42:15 PM 1321 Views
I'll echo that vote. - 07/11/2011 06:15:21 PM 1184 Views
He could have just been being polite - 07/11/2011 06:34:30 PM 1364 Views
Very good point, I think a roleclaim from ?, using Kronin's coded roleclaim from yesterday - 07/11/2011 08:22:45 PM 1124 Views
? can't decode Kronin's RC, and he wouldn't be allowed to give his own - 07/11/2011 08:45:50 PM 1064 Views
yeah I could go ahead and roleclaim if you want... - 07/11/2011 08:56:41 PM 1025 Views
No, I don't want you to claim - 07/11/2011 08:57:47 PM 957 Views
Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:06:06 PM 973 Views
Re: Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:06:23 PM 1030 Views
Re: Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:09:04 PM 1002 Views
I oh got confused. - 08/11/2011 02:41:46 AM 1065 Views
That is not the case against Kronin. - 07/11/2011 09:48:52 PM 878 Views
I don't think substitution is enough - 07/11/2011 10:25:27 PM 1119 Views
Anybody else get a chuckle out of this? *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:36:28 PM 521 Views
Ignore the *NM* *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:43:16 PM 508 Views
doubly so... - 07/11/2011 06:49:05 PM 1152 Views
out of what? *NM* - 07/11/2011 07:51:06 PM 503 Views
Shrug, I think we should still get a roleclaim from ?/Kronin - 08/11/2011 01:51:24 PM 1107 Views
I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think... - 08/11/2011 08:46:07 PM 1047 Views
Re: I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think... - 08/11/2011 09:39:45 PM 1114 Views
Heh. Die? Die! His username makes that weird. *NM* - 08/11/2011 10:55:22 PM 557 Views
eh - 08/11/2011 10:40:47 PM 1079 Views
What am I missing here? - 08/11/2011 02:32:14 PM 1073 Views
Re: What am I missing here? - 08/11/2011 08:38:19 PM 1074 Views
Semi-RBIRL - 09/11/2011 05:26:11 AM 995 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis - 09/11/2011 10:24:06 PM 1190 Views
RC decode - 09/11/2011 10:35:52 PM 1141 Views
Bah, now I have to claim as well - 09/11/2011 10:46:37 PM 1052 Views
All right, let's proceed sanely then - 09/11/2011 10:51:12 PM 1030 Views
OK, Unvote - 09/11/2011 11:23:35 PM 934 Views
decoding: - 09/11/2011 11:22:31 PM 1077 Views
Would you mind walking through that last step? - 09/11/2011 11:44:30 PM 1028 Views
Not at all. - 10/11/2011 12:09:09 AM 1033 Views
Okay I confirm your decode then - 10/11/2011 12:16:22 AM 1018 Views
... *NM* - 10/11/2011 01:59:58 PM 598 Views
Woah. Problems. - 09/11/2011 11:32:40 PM 969 Views
there is something really fishy going on... *NM* - 09/11/2011 11:34:09 PM 515 Views
what? - 09/11/2011 11:32:45 PM 852 Views
Re: what? - 09/11/2011 11:34:16 PM 916 Views
Actually, there's a strong chance neither is lying - 09/11/2011 11:53:35 PM 1231 Views
So, what now? - 10/11/2011 12:49:12 AM 1295 Views
Is or Is Not a Cop (Table) - 10/11/2011 12:52:52 AM 1089 Views
I am not a cop. *NM* - 10/11/2011 01:04:38 AM 439 Views
I'm the daycop. Vote: Ranagrande. - 10/11/2011 01:41:59 AM 1013 Views
EBWOP: here's the code. - 10/11/2011 01:43:00 AM 882 Views
Decode confirmed - 10/11/2011 02:08:26 AM 914 Views
Yeah, forgot to say I used Vignere. *NM* - 10/11/2011 02:18:31 AM 524 Views
EBWOP again - 10/11/2011 01:44:04 AM 863 Views
Stand by for the moment - 10/11/2011 01:49:38 AM 1041 Views
Jesus...I REALLY need to read everything before I start posting. - 10/11/2011 01:54:11 AM 1044 Views
Add to that the next follow up, that ? might previously have been a Day Cop too - 10/11/2011 02:04:29 AM 1106 Views
It's possible... - 10/11/2011 02:18:02 AM 1010 Views
Re: It's possible... - 10/11/2011 02:30:00 AM 1335 Views
I am a daycop. I found Isaac innocent. *NM* - 10/11/2011 02:02:05 PM 560 Views
We still need you role decode *NM* - 10/11/2011 06:19:53 PM 473 Views
(I did, in my other message) - 10/11/2011 07:18:43 PM 850 Views
Okay, got ya, decode confirmed *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:02:55 PM 535 Views
i am a cop - 10/11/2011 07:00:14 PM 896 Views
and my decode - 10/11/2011 07:14:38 PM 1036 Views
Yep, decode confirmed *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:06:16 PM 554 Views
Also, which ? did you check? - 10/11/2011 08:08:05 PM 949 Views
original ? - 10/11/2011 08:10:30 PM 1039 Views
Thanks *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:11:13 PM 475 Views
Not a cop *NM* - 10/11/2011 11:48:27 PM 727 Views
To the decode-mobile! *plays 60s Batman music* - 11/11/2011 02:32:06 PM 955 Views
Let's take another look at that poem - 10/11/2011 01:44:36 AM 1140 Views
Hahaha I have to read all of these posts, but FT, you're insane. - 10/11/2011 01:58:01 PM 1124 Views
FT IS insane. Turns out I was missing something after all. *NM* - 10/11/2011 09:59:56 PM 447 Views
OK! Here we go: - 10/11/2011 02:23:10 PM 1097 Views
Re: OK! Here we go: - 10/11/2011 05:52:25 PM 1154 Views
I think it's time to consider mass RC - 10/11/2011 08:15:36 PM 986 Views
Sure... - 10/11/2011 09:19:49 PM 1212 Views
There's a lot of options still, and decode confirmed by the way - 10/11/2011 09:48:05 PM 1195 Views
I have been nominated! - 10/11/2011 10:30:37 PM 1088 Views
Thanks - 10/11/2011 10:36:36 PM 1132 Views
My pleasure *NM* - 10/11/2011 10:44:23 PM 446 Views
*NM* - 10/11/2011 11:21:59 PM 480 Views
Not saying that that is right of course... - 10/11/2011 11:23:23 PM 1031 Views
Hmm... - 10/11/2011 11:20:50 PM 884 Views
I totally agree. - 10/11/2011 09:54:25 PM 944 Views
The wasy I see it, anybody not claiming cop is going to get lynched - 10/11/2011 11:57:24 PM 1074 Views
Lying and claiming cop when you can't decode your RC will get you lynched faster. *NM* - 11/11/2011 12:33:05 AM 477 Views
Which I didn't do *NM* - 11/11/2011 02:05:30 AM 521 Views
I know, I know. - 11/11/2011 03:57:51 AM 936 Views
Fox, did you get a response on your investigation? *NM* - 11/11/2011 12:20:12 AM 553 Views
I hadn't performed one yet. - 11/11/2011 12:34:48 AM 1043 Views
Isaac - 11/11/2011 02:00:18 AM 1133 Views
Or me - 11/11/2011 02:07:10 AM 1042 Views
I'd recommend ? - 11/11/2011 02:15:24 AM 900 Views
Bring it. - 11/11/2011 03:10:14 AM 945 Views
Someone who has already been copped - 11/11/2011 03:57:08 AM 897 Views
I'll investigate ? because yuna's the other daycop - 11/11/2011 04:00:49 AM 927 Views
Wait a minute....I meant that I would be testing it against rana. Not yuna - 11/11/2011 01:39:16 PM 1192 Views
no i'm not, im a normal cop *NM* - 11/11/2011 09:18:23 PM 562 Views
I had everything messed up anyway *NM* - 12/11/2011 10:45:54 PM 498 Views
Vote: Beetnemisis/RBIRL - 11/11/2011 02:04:35 AM 965 Views
Hey people sorry for the unexpected RBIRL - 11/11/2011 11:47:11 AM 1142 Views
RBIRL here too. - 11/11/2011 01:34:45 PM 898 Views
I'm thinking either Hieshyn or ? - 11/11/2011 04:32:16 PM 1016 Views
It kinda seems like Hieshyn and ? are our logical lynch targets, plus Cop (Table) - 11/11/2011 10:09:52 PM 1231 Views
Fox investigated ? and found him innocent *NM* - 11/11/2011 10:41:39 PM 474 Views
Vote: ? - 11/11/2011 10:46:43 PM 905 Views
Yeah, that seems logical next step, Vote: ? - 13/11/2011 02:59:25 AM 1244 Views
mrr, vote ? then *NM* - 13/11/2011 10:27:49 AM 648 Views
Think my vote was on ? already. - 13/11/2011 04:26:49 PM 1065 Views
Vote: ? *NM* - 14/11/2011 02:27:20 AM 600 Views
That should be lynch with yours, so... - 14/11/2011 03:07:36 AM 964 Views
? Has been lynched - 14/11/2011 03:50:31 AM 1129 Views
Game ends. - 14/11/2011 10:25:04 PM 994 Views
Role list: - 14/11/2011 10:26:32 PM 1034 Views
Jeeez. - 14/11/2011 11:43:47 PM 1002 Views
Kronin originally RC as a Tracker so we might have done better if we had been able to continue *NM* - 15/11/2011 12:06:07 AM 494 Views
Not even cause tracker is still the odd man out. - 15/11/2011 12:20:17 AM 997 Views
That might have worked but everyone would have had targets - 15/11/2011 02:20:43 AM 1107 Views
Maybe, but I still would have known he was guilty. *NM* - 15/11/2011 02:55:43 AM 466 Views
You were paranoid, amusingly enough. - 15/11/2011 02:59:43 AM 1010 Views
Ya there was no hope for us *NM* - 15/11/2011 12:04:06 AM 501 Views
YAY! - 14/11/2011 10:48:54 PM 992 Views
Wow. *NM* - 15/11/2011 01:09:28 AM 547 Views
Also I would like to be added to the list of future Moderator - 15/11/2011 12:07:51 AM 872 Views
You'd have first dibs via our order of precedence system - 15/11/2011 02:05:04 AM 1128 Views
Also whoever Mods should probably post a recruitment thread on some other NBs - 15/11/2011 02:50:02 AM 1045 Views
I expect my next game to draw in some new players. - 15/11/2011 02:58:59 AM 1011 Views
More is better, okay that would be Hieshyn or Beet then, unless ? wants to toss in - 15/11/2011 03:26:25 AM 986 Views
Nope I'm not ready to mod yet... - 15/11/2011 08:29:24 PM 908 Views
hey - 15/11/2011 09:46:28 PM 868 Views
It's Hieshyn's if he wants it, otherwise I can go next. - 15/11/2011 12:40:13 PM 1040 Views
I'm not ready to go next - 15/11/2011 02:43:07 PM 1124 Views
Aight, I think it's me then. - 15/11/2011 03:15:21 PM 897 Views
Re: Aight, I think it's me then. - 15/11/2011 04:09:07 PM 1059 Views
Deathless Mafia? Is that a thing? SQUEE, Mistborn! *NM* - 15/11/2011 10:15:49 PM 448 Views
If it wasn't a thing before, it is now! *NM* - 15/11/2011 10:53:14 PM 456 Views
ooooh - 15/11/2011 11:27:26 PM 910 Views
You've got a week to read the last 2....GO, GO, GO!! *NM* - 15/11/2011 11:43:21 PM 492 Views
hah! i could read both in two days - 16/11/2011 07:56:58 PM 956 Views
Just for you, the game shall be spoiler free! *NM* - 16/11/2011 12:12:24 AM 450 Views
Speaking of which, any timeline yet? - 19/11/2011 07:25:11 PM 946 Views
Sounds fantastic - 16/11/2011 12:10:06 AM 1101 Views
That could also be fantastic. *NM* - 16/11/2011 12:13:29 AM 494 Views
I AM ALL SORTS OF PUMPED. *NM* - 16/11/2011 09:11:38 PM 515 Views
Though may or may not actually be playing... *NM* - 16/11/2011 09:11:58 PM 459 Views
Before the next game starts, we probably need to discuss RC coding - 15/11/2011 02:15:27 AM 1239 Views
Yeah, I really didn't like that idea. - 15/11/2011 02:58:21 AM 1348 Views
An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:08:17 AM 1148 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:36:38 AM 1039 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:43:39 AM 1369 Views
I really didn't like it either. - 16/11/2011 06:20:33 PM 996 Views
I liked my plan: Random voting ftw! *NM* - 16/11/2011 06:29:07 PM 505 Views

Reply to Message